Submit your Article

Ex-US President Donald Trump watched last year's Capitol riot on TV at the White House, ignoring his children and aides who "begged him" to rebuke the mob, a congressional inquiry has heard, BBC reported.

"He chose not to act," said Adam Kinzinger, one of two Republicans on the Democratic-led committee.

The primetime hearing was told Mr Trump did not place a single call to law enforcement or national security staff.

He was motivated by "his selfish desire to stay in power", the inquiry alleged.

On Thursday night, the House of Representatives select committee used its eighth hearing of the summer to draw a timeline of Mr Trump's activities over 187 minutes on 6 January 2021 as a mob of his supporters raided Congress.

The panel is seeking to build a case that Mr Trump, a Republican, acted illegally in a bid to overturn his defeat by Joe Biden, a Democrat, in the November 2020 presidential election.

Mr Trump, who has been hinting he may run again for president in 2024, has dismissed the inquiry as a "kangaroo court" designed to distract Americans from the "disaster" of Democratic governance.

Amid the highest inflation in four decades, Mr Biden's approval rating has fallen to the lowest level of any White House incumbent in the modern era at this stage in a presidency. 

The hearing was told that former President Trump had watched coverage of the riot on Fox News in the private dining room at the White House for more than two-and-a-half hours, according to BBC.

Elaine Luria, a Virginia Democrat on the committee, said: "President Trump sat at his dining table and watched the attack on television while his senior-most staff, closest advisers and family members begged him to do what is expected of any American president."

The lawmaker also said the chief White House photographer had wanted to take pictures during the historic event, but was told not to.

A former White House national security staffer, whose voice was obscured to conceal his identity, said officials in the executive mansion were "in a state of shock" over what was unfolding at the Capitol.

The committee also played parts of a videotaped testimony by former Trump White House counsel Pat Cipollone, who said he had pushed for a strong statement from the president condemning the onslaught.

"I said that people need to be told, there needs to be a public announcement, fast, that people need to leave the Capitol," said Mr Cipollone.

The president's children, Ivanka Trump and Don Jr, had also wanted him to call off the rioters, the committee heard.

But former press aide Sarah Matthews testified that an unnamed White House colleague had argued that if Mr Trump were to disavow the violence it would be "handing a win to the media".

At 14:24 that day, Mr Trump sent a tweet attacking his Vice-President, Mike Pence, saying he "didn't have the courage to" spurn his constitutional duty of certifying Mr Biden's election win at Congress, BBC reported.

Ms Matthews said the post amounted to "pouring gasoline on the fire". She and Matthew Pottinger, who was deputy national security adviser to the president, testified that that tweet had prompted them both to resign.

Three hours and seven minutes after the assault began, Mr Trump released a video at 16:17, recorded from the White House Rose Garden, in which he praised the rioters as "very special", but asked them to disperse.

Bennie Thompson, chairman of the committee and a Mississippi Democrat, said in his opening remarks: "For 187 minutes on Jan 6, this man of unbridled destructive energy could not be moved. 

"Not by his aides, not by his allies, not by the violent chants of rioters, or the desperate pleas of those facing down the mob. He could not be moved."

The committee also aired a previously unseen video outtake of Mr Trump on 7 January repudiating the violence at the Capitol of the day before.

"I don't want to say the election is over," Mr Trump said during the recording as he apparently read from a script.

The panel has suggested there might be enough evidence to charge Mr Trump with such counts as obstructing an official proceeding of Congress, conspiracy to defraud the American people, or witness tampering, according to BBC.

Security forces in Sri Lanka have raided the main anti-government protest camp in the capital Colombo and have begun pulling down tents, BBC reported.

Hundreds of troops and police commandos moved on the protesters outside the presidential offices, hours before they were due to leave the area.

A BBC video journalist was beaten by the army and one soldier snatched his phone and deleted videos.

It comes after Ranil Wickremesinghe was sworn in as president.

Sri Lanka's ex-president Gotabaya Rajapaksa fled the country last week.

Mr Wickremesinghe - the former prime minister - is seen as deeply unpopular with the public, and has vowed tough action against demonstrators. But some protesters have said they will give him a chance.

Sri Lanka has seen months of mass unrest over an economic crisis.

Many blame the Rajapaksa administration for mishandling the nation's finances, and see Mr Wickremesinghe as part of the problem. But there were few demonstrations on the streets the day after he won the parliament vote, according to BBC.

Soon after Mr Wickremesinghe was sworn in, he made clear that any attempt to topple the government or occupy government buildings was not democracy and warned that those who indulge in such activities will be dealt with firmly according to the law.

There had been concerns among demonstrators that the government might gradually crack down on the protest movement sooner or later.

Nepal’s major political parties will certainly not contest the upcoming parliamentary elections on their own. What is uncertain, though, is the type of electoral alliances they will forge. 

For now, Pushpa Kamal Dahal’s CPN (Maoist Center) sits on the fence, between the Nepali Congress (NC), its current coalition partner with a liberal ideological bent, and the CPN-UML, a fellow communist party. Dahal wants to wring out maximum benefits for himself as well as his party.

Congress will still be his first priority, but he will then drive a hard bargain. The Maoist party wants the coalition’s tickets in at least 60 of the 165 first-past-the-post (FPTP) seats. A Maoist leader says the party has already conveyed this to the Congress leadership. If not, the Maoist Center will ally with the UML.

The three parties have so far managed to keep the talks on electoral alliances, reportedly taking place at multiple levels, under wraps out of fear of external saboteurs. 

There are reports that Deuba has offered Dahal the posts of the President and the Speaker in the post-election political dispensation. 

Dahal has made his desire to become prime minister known as well. On June 24, he said at an event in Kathmandu that he could take drastic steps to address bad governance if he were to be the prime minister.

The need for an electoral alliance has become indispensable even for senior Congress leaders to win elections. Ram Chandra Poudel, who faced defeat in his last electoral outing in 2017, is a case in point. 

Senior Congress leader Krishna Prasad Sitaula says, “When even electoral dates are not finalized, it is too early to talk about the nitty-gritty of poll alliances.”   

The ruling party is precariously placed, as the seats must also be shared with the CPN (Unified Socialist) and the Madhes-based parties if it wants to keep the KP Sharma Oli-led UML away from power.

“The potent anti-alliance voice within the party and the difficult demands of other parties in the coalition have complicated things,” says NC Central Working Committee leader Nain Singh Mahar.   

Nonetheless, on July 19, Nepali Congress Central Working Committee (CWC) decided to forge an electoral alliance with coalition partners. 

But there is still pressure within the Congress that the party should contest at least 100 seats under the FPTP—a tough ask in a five-party coalition. Some NC leaders fear rival candidates could split votes if the party settles for fewer seats. At the same time, there is a concern that the Maoists could forge an electoral alliance with the UML.

The local poll results have made the Maoist Center more ambitious. Its leaders now claim the party will be a decisive force for at least another five years. The Maoists goal is to become the second largest party after the Congress while also preventing the latter from securing a majority. 

Some Maoist leaders say it is only but natural for Dahal to stake a claim on premiership after he extended full support to Deuba’s bid for prime minister following the collapse of the Oli government. It is time, they say, for Deuba to return the favor. 

“The fate of the electoral alliance revolves around this central issue,” Maoist leader Khagaraj Raj Bhatta says. “The Nepali Congress must show flexibility on power- and seat-sharing to keep the coalition intact.”

Meanwhile, notwithstanding the bitter feud between Dahal and Oli that led to the breakup of the erstwhile Nepal Communist Party (NCP), the Maoist party is also holding talks with the UML on a possible electoral alliance.

Earlier this week, senior Maoist leader Narayan Kaji Shrestha said he is in favor of an alliance with the UML, even if it is impossible to reunite the two parties in the near future.

UML Chairman Oli, however, is in no hurry. He wants to become prime minister for one more term and the chances that he will support Dahal’s premiership bid are slim.

Oli nevertheless has conveyed to Dahal that he is positive about a possible poll alliance, while also making it clear that he will not sign any power-sharing deal before the elections.

Oli is under the pressure from the UML’s second-rung leaders to forge an electoral alliance—if not unify—with the Maoists. There is also pressure from China on Oli and Dahal to come together. 

China had played a crucial role for the 2018 UML-Maoist unity, if only to counter the US influence in Nepal. Although the merger broke down over Oli-Dahal rivalry, Beijing still wants a communist-led government in Kathmandu.

This time, however, China has taken a softer and subtler approach while trying to persuade the two largest left parties in Nepal to work together.

Some Maoist leaders say as neither the Congress nor the UML is in a position to form a government on its own, the post of prime minister is again up for negotiation.

Political analyst Bishnu Dahal also says Maoist Chairman Dahal wants to become prime minister at any cost as he has been out of power for more than five years.  

“Whether the Maoist party partners with the Congress or the UML in the elections, Dahal wants the prime minister’s post for himself,” he says. 

Meanwhile, the Maoists, the CPN (Unified Socialist) and senior communist leader Bam Dev Gautam are trying to forge a leftist ideological alliance in order to increase their collective bargaining power with Congress or CPN-UML. They are also contemplating the formation of a new socialist party. 

New Delhi asks Dahal to keep the coalition intact

Amid talks of electoral alliances, CPN (Maoist Center) Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal recently visited India, where he met with the Indian Minister for External Affairs S Jaishankar, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, and Foreign Secretary Vinaya Mohan Kwatra, among others. 

In an interview, Dahal said that he had assured Indian officials there would be no repeat of the 2017 surprise left alliance this time. 

The Maoist-UML poll alliance and their subsequent merger had caught India unawares.

A New Delhi-diplomatic source says Delhi does not want a repeat of 2017 and has urged Dahal to continue the current alliance with the Nepali Congress. Dahal too has assured senior Indian officials that his priority is continuation of the current five-party coalition.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi did not grant an audience to the Maoist chief, the source says, as the Indian officials Dahal interacted with were not convinced of the sincerity of his pledges. 

Meanwhile, Congress leaders are also in constant touch with New Delhi on likely poll alliances. 

First lady Arzu Rana Deuba, who is in New Delhi for medical treatment, has been in regular consultations with Indian officials. 

Speaker Agni Prasad Sapkota directed the government to inform about the State Partnership Program (SPP).

Saying that his attention had been drawn, Sapkota, during a meeting of the House of Representatives on Thursday, directed the government to inform about the status of the SPP.

“My attention has been drawn towards the SPP agreement raised by honorable lawmakers. In this regard, I direct the Government of Nepal to inform about the decision of the Government of Nepal and its implementation,” he said.

The government is yet to write to the US saying that Nepal would not participate in the US’s State Partnership Program.