Submit your Article

“Nepal has many histories. It has histories of the Malla era and the Shah era, but a comprehensive history of the country is lacking. So, there is no history uniting the Mechi in the east Mechi with Mahakali in the west….” This is the gist of what the renowned historian Surya Vikram Gyawali said to Kedar Man Vyathit right after the latter’s appointment as the Chancellor of Nepal Rajkiya Pragya Pratishthan about 54 years ago in his capacity as a member of the Pratishthan, stressing the need to connect the Nepalis with the history of Nepal.

Even after the erstwhile Royal Nepal Academy got a new name, Nepal Prajna Pratishthan, after a wave of political changes that occurred about 17 years ago, Gyawali’s words remain relevant. 

Fifty-four years later, Gyan Vallabh Jwala, who was with the academy back then, cited this communication at a program that Pashupati Area Development Trust had organized recently to collect opinions from scholars for the establishment of a Shri Pashupati Hindu University. 

Gyawali’s communication with Vyathit features in ‘Vichar-patra’ of a committee formed to step up preparations for the establishment of the university and also in this journalist’s recently completed MPhil dissertation. 

My research is based on a unique perspective of Professor Harold A Innis, a Canadian scholar associated with communication theory, in particular ‘The Bias of Communication’ and ‘Time-Biased Communication’. This theory is based on the premise that the identity of a nation is built upon its own cultural heritages and civilizations. 

So, the plans for the development of a Shri Pashupati Hindu University have this journalist naturally elated. Indeed,  the Pashupatinath Temple, a UNESCO world heritage site, is one of the several religious-cultural-spiritual heritages that makes Nepal known to the world. If the university manages to emerge as the very best among similar other institutions in due course of time, with support from the government and other stakeholders, it will further boost Nepal’s image globally. 

At this point, it will be contextual to quote the author Stephen R Covey. He says, “What you do with what you know is far more important than what you know. If you do not use what you know, you can forget it or lose it. To share what you know is like planting a seed. If you plant a seed in the soil, it will germinate in the soil, grow in the field, and go to another place, and it will not die. If you throw it in the mud, it will rot, and if you throw it elsewhere, it will dry up. The seed will not germinate.” 

This statement points out the need to apply the acquired knowledge in the right time and place for desired outcomes. In the ocean-like span of Pashupatinath, my research may be a drop of water, but then drops of water collected from various pilgrimages have significant worth, don’t they? 

Also, let me recall a high-level promise to accelerate the process of establishing a Children's Literature Institute in Nepal. This wonderful plan is getting nowhere, with the ministry concerned not bothering to take initiative toward this end. 

But the proposed university should not suffer the same fate. 

Active involvement of the President in this project has given a glimmer of hope and so has the Culture Minister’s remarks implying that the government has attached due importance to the project. 

If the university materializes and, in course of time, manages to establish itself as a reputed institution, it may not even need government funding, for it can generate enough revenues by drawing students from far and wide, making it a self-sustaining institution.  

The onus is on the government and other stakeholders to turn this wonderful plan into reality. 

Power is not a simple concept as we may have thought, there are many types of power and there are many competing theories of power. A famous American political scientist, Joseph Nye, differentiates between two types of power, hard and soft power. Eventually, Nye introduces smart power as the ‘balance of hard and soft power. According to him, ‘soft power’ is the ability to get ‘others to want the outcomes that you want’, and more particularly ‘the ability to achieve goals through attraction rather than coercion’. There are three measures of soft power: Familiarity, reputation and influence. Culture, diplomacy, education, business/innovation and government are the elements that help assess the soft power of countries. This article looks at the soft power of India and Nepal and its role in shaping bilateral relations.

India’s soft power in Nepal

India is the fourth most powerful country in Asia pursuing a regional leadership role in South Asia. The influential role it has nurtured over the decade can be a game-changer for the region. In keeping with a changing world, India has used different bilateral and multilateral strategies to navigate the region toward a well-balanced future of prosperity and peace. In the 1990s, India started embracing a friendly policy toward its neighbors and projecting ‘soft power’ in the neighborhood. India’s soft power has traditionally been characterized by diversity. Historical accounts tell us that a prosperous India has drawn migrants, brokers and raiders like ‘Alexander the Great’. Its soft power has spread over millennia through a culture of secularism, liberalism and inclusiveness.

After Narendra Modi’s emergence as the Prime Minister of India in 2014, India has invested substantial resources in building up its soft power. We can say India has been more innovative in using its soft power since then. Bollywood, education, space diplomacy and diaspora are major sources of India’s soft power in Nepal along with our common heritages like Yog and Ayurved.  Globally also, India has been pushing Yog and Ayurved as a major source of its soft power quite successfully. Nepal can reap benefits from this initiative while enhancing bilateral relations. Giving continuity to a science in practice for ages, Modi is showing the world how to practice Yog. Nepal has also organized a series of Yog initiatives in the country of late.

India and Nepal share an open border, people from both sides can move easily, get married and settle down. The two countries have a large number of people, who are adherents of Hinduism and Buddhism. Thus, diaspora and religion are another most influential aspect of soft power. Moreover, religious tourism is the unsurpassed tool of soft power between Nepal and India.

Thousands of Nepali students go to India every year for higher education, especially in the field of medicine and engineering. Every year, India provides around 3,000 scholarships to Nepali students for various academic degrees like PhD, Master’s and Bachelor’s. India’s contribution to the growth of human resources in Nepal has been a key aspect of bilateral collaboration. Indian educational institutions springing up across Nepal are expected to contribute to bilateral ties by bolstering educational infrastructure of Nepal. 

A significant number of Nepalis visit India every year to avail themselves of better medical facilities. India has provided medical support to Nepal during natural disasters and health emergencies. Thus, health and education can be seen as another major source of India’s soft power in Nepal.

There is a huge interest in Indian music, cinema and television serials in Nepal. Many artists and professionals visit our two countries, enhancing the bond of friendship. 

Apart from this, Gurkha regiments have played a role in bolstering India’s defenses and the movie titled ‘Sam Bahadur’, based on the life of Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw, is expected to shine a light on the contributions of Gurkha soldiers from Nepal to India’s defense and security.

Nepal’s soft power in India

Nepal has already established itself as a benevolent country on the world stage, which further strengthens its resolve to identify and pursue soft power. Some of the most notable and recurring themes of soft power that Nepal possesses are tourism, Ayurved, the Gurkha Regiments, Himalayas and Buddhism. This abode of peace—the birthplace of Gautam Buddha and Tapobhumi of Rishis and Munis—has been able to generate a lot of goodwill from around the world. 

A source of soft power for Nepal, the Gurkha soldiers become a formidable power for India when they become part of its defense capabilities. However, the newly-introduced Agnipath scheme has rendered Gurkha recruitments from Nepal uncertain.

Conclusion

Soft power projection can be a means to enhance Nepal-India relations. 

For India, increasing scholarship quotas for Nepali students and funding for Nepali educational institutions can be an effective way to project soft power in Nepal.   

Shooting of Bollywood movies in beautiful locations of Nepal can bring us revenues (also in the form of increased tourist arrivals from India), while also benefiting the Bollywood film industry by bringing down production costs.   

Religious-spiritual destinations like Pasupatinath, Muktinath, Janaki Mandir and Lumbini (Nepal) as well as Hardwar, Varanasi and Tirupati (India) draw lakhs of pilgrims from the two countries every year, holding a great economic potential. 

Home to a variety of herbs used in Ayurved for centuries, Nepal can also be an ideal location for hosting Yog conventions and retreats. The recent landing of Chandrayaan-3 into the Moon, which made India the fourth country to successfully land on the Moon, and the first to do so near the lunar south pole, has increased India’s soft power tremendously. India’s plans like the development of a satellite for SAARC member-states are likely to enhance its soft power in the neighborhood and beyond.

Resident doctors working in Central Institutes in India have requested the government of Nepal to take steps to make sure that they get stipend from the medical colleges they are studying in.

Nepali resident doctors working in All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi lament that they have to perform usual clinical/hospital duties as part of their courses without remuneration, while their Indian counterparts get more than InRs 100,000 for the same job.

At least 60 Nepali students enrolled in MD, MS, MDS, DM and MCH courses are working as resident doctors in one of India’s top medical colleges. They log 12 hours on a normal shift and have to put in 48 hours extra during emergencies, without getting paid.

As their long-pressed demand for stipend has gone unheard, resident doctors at AIIMS have requested the government of Nepal to take up the matter with India, once again.

Notably, earlier government effort in a similar case has paid off. 

Nepali students in Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh and Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry have been getting the stipend. 

These institutions started paying the Nepali students too after the then Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli raised the issue during his visit to India in 2020. 

However, AIIMs students in New Delhi and Rishikesh continue to struggle for the same, even after repeatedly requesting Indian and Nepali government authorities to address their concern.

“This comes as a huge economic burden for us, for our families and for our nation. Seats are allocated for Nepali medical students, but stipends are not provided. This needs to stop,” said Dr Laxman Bhagat, one of the representatives of the Nepalese Resident Doctors in AIIMS Delhi.

Despite repeated efforts from the doctors, including meetings with relevant officials and written communication with Indian government authorities, this issue remains unaddressed, said Dr Bhagat.

Notably, this is an instance of non-reciprocal treatment on the part of Indian authorities.  

Nepal has been providing stipend to post-graduate Indian students studying in Nepali medical colleges. The Indian students studying in the Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University and BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan under self-financing schemes get a monthly stipend of Rs 33,000 and Rs 32,000 each.

It may be noted that the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, India, had written to AIIMS to inform the latter about amendments required in the act/rules/regulations to facilitate payment of stipend to students from Nepal enrolled in PG courses in AIIMS, New Delhi, to no avail. 

AIIMS offers postgraduate degrees in about 55 different specialties/super specialties.

As 2023 draws to a close, ApEx looks back at how Nepal conducted its foreign policy and what it looks like in 2024. Unlike in the years prior, Nepal had a rather smooth relationship with major powers—US, China and India—in 2023. This was largely because Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal made it a point to not raise the long-standing issues with these countries. Though the CPN (Maoist Center) and its primary ruling ally Nepali Congress have different outlooks on foreign policy, there were no serious disagreements when it came to the conduct of foreign policy.

Dahal, who came to power at the end of 2022, paid official visits to India and China, and attended the 78th United Nations General Assembly in the US, where he engaged with several world leaders. Amid these engagements, Nepal faced new challenges, such as the tragic Hamas attack that claimed the lives of 10 Nepali students, with one still held hostage. Additionally, Russia recruited Nepali nationals into its army, placing them at the forefront of the conflict with Ukraine.

But overall, Nepal’s bilateral engagements in the year 2023, particularly concerning the US, India and China, were smooth. Reciprocally, all three countries engaged with Nepal through exchanges of the visits at different levels. 

Throughout the year, the US sent its high-level officials to engage with the Nepal government as well as a wide section of Nepali society. Similarly, Chinese officials mainly from the Communist Party of China visited Kathmandu. China also invited scores of Nepali leaders and people from diverse fields to participate in various events. With India, the Dahal administration adopted a cautious approach. During his India trip in May, he steered clear from raising crucial issues such as border dispute, Eminent Persons’ Group report, and the 1950 treaty with his counterpart Narendra Modi. Instead, the prime minister focused on development cooperation, primarily on the energy sector.

India has agreed to buy electricity from Nepal as well as allow energy export to Bangladesh. The three countries are working on regional energy cooperation. 

“The relationship between the two countries has gathered momentum, mainly in the areas of energy trade, connectivity and security,” said an Indian official. 

One of the landmark achievements of the Nepal-US cooperation was the formal implementation of projects related to the construction of transmission lines and road upgradation under the US’ Millennium Corporation Challenge (MCC) program. The US extensively engaged with the Nepal government to make this happen, because even after the parliamentary endorsement of the MCC Nepal Compact, there were suspicions about smooth project implementation, mainly due to China’s objection.

There are still doubts regarding timely completion of the MCC projects due to technical and bureaucratic hurdles, and the US has said that there should be discussions in Washington about possible extension of the project deadlines. 

The US also pledged to further assist Nepal through development cooperation and investments in a meeting held between Foreign Minister Narayan Prakash Saud and the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken. As the US is advancing its influence in the Indo-Pacific region, it is in its interest to engage more with Nepal, which is strategically located between China and India. Advancing democracy everywhere is one of the key aspects of the Biden administration’s foreign policy, so the US is engaging with Nepal on this front as well.

According to US officials, though Nepal’s democracy is a beacon for the entire South Asia, failure to make progress on the economic front may put it in jeopardy. Washington wants to advance economic cooperation to support the democratic process. 

During Minister Saud’s visit to the US, American officials showed renewed interest in Nepal’s tourism, agriculture, and health sectors.

In China, there are more optics than real substances. During the prime ministership of Sher Bahadur Deuba of the Nepali Congress, the level of trust in the bilateral relationship between Nepal and China had reached a low point. Dahal’s ascendance to power helped mitigate the environment of mistrust, as Beijing naturally feels more comfortable with a communist prime minister in Nepal.

During his trip to China, Prime Minister Dahal did not raise some issues that Beijing perceives as sensitive, including alleged border encroachment. He went a step ahead by agreeing that Nepal opposes Taiwan’s independence and the one-China principle to convince Beijing that he is serious about China’s security interests.  

China had some high expectations with the Dahal government, such as clear progress in the Belt and Road Initiatives (BRI) and endorsement of its Global Security Initiatives (GSI), but Dahal—despite appreciating GSI in private talks with Beijing officials—did not sign any agreement on those issues. Dahal may have pledged to make some progress on BRI in the future but it depends on how his relationship evolves with New Delhi and Beijing. 

“The prime minister did not make progress on BRI because he believed it would upset New Delhi and Washington,” said a government official.

Besides bilateral engagement, PM Dahal also engaged in some multilateral forums such as COP28 in Dubai and the United Nations General Assembly in the US. The primary focus of Dahal was the impacts of climate change in the Himalayas and resolving the transitional justice process.

Looking ahead to 2024, all three countries will continue their engagement with Nepal, though India and the US will be preoccupied with national elections. Uncertainties loom in the US, with speculations about Donald Trump's potential return. Nepal’s relations with these countries will hinge on major-power dynamics, with ongoing debates about whether Nepal should abandon its non-alignment policy amid growing global geopolitical tensions. This debate is likely to intensify as big countries vie for Nepal’s alignment in their orbits.

The National Youth Policy formulated eight years ago has defined those aged 16 to 40 years as youths. National Census-2021 states that youths constitute 42.56 percent of the national population, which stood at 40.35 percent during the census conducted in the year 2011. 

According to data from the Foreign Employment Department, the number of Nepalis going abroad for work has increased by more than 21 percent in the fiscal year 2022-23 compared to the fiscal 2021-22. In 2022-23, a staggering 771,327 people went to countries other than India for jobs, more than 630,000 people took work permits in 2021-22 whereas in 2020-21 only 166,698 people went for foreign employment. In 2019-20, 368,433 people took work permit, followed by 508,828 in 2018-19, 612,685 people in 2017-18, 354,533 people in 2016-17 and 640,981 people in 2015-16, whereas 693,032 people (new labor permits and renewals included) Nepali went abroad for jobs in 2014-15. These data show that youth exodus for jobs peaked in 2015-16 before reaching a new high in 2022-23.

Why do a large number of Nepalis seem to think that their country of birth does not have much to offer in terms of employment opportunities? Is it solely because of indifference on the part of the state? 

The Constitution of Nepal 2015 has regarded the right to employment as a fundamental right, but this right, like several other rights, remain largely on paper.

It is not that the government has not tried to reduce unemployment. With the aim of providing jobs, the government launched the Prime Minister’s Employment Program five years ago. 

Thousands of youths benefited from this program that basically provides 100 days’ employment to unemployed people in a year, which still meant too little for millions of unemployed people, 

Besides, how many people can make a living for themselves and their families by getting gainful employment for 100 days in a year? 

While the Nepali job market scenario remains grim, there’s no drought of promises to create jobs in the country. For instance, the Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industry has announced plans to create 2.2m jobs by 2030. The plans are great, whether they will materialize or not is a different thing altogether. 

The 15th periodic plan of the National Planning Commission has envisaged a high-level National Employment Authority for creating jobs, coordinating with various agencies and regulating the employment sector by bringing Youth Self-employment Fund, Poverty Alleviation Fund and NPC on board. 

Like previous editions, this periodic plan has also made some lofty promises. It has pledged to create 2.5m more jobs, increase workforce participation rate from 38.5 percent to 49 percent, increase the share of the formal sector in employment from 36.5 percent to 50 percent and provide professional, technical and skill training to 500,000 people. 

What’s more, it plans to establish employment information centers at all local levels and tie them up with the employment system of the organized sector, reduce industrial labor disputes and develop sound labor relations. 

However, these tall promises should be compared with the situation on the ground. The Nepal Labor Force Survey conducted about six years ago put the unemployment rate in the country at a staggering 11.4 percent, compared to a dismal 2.1 percent and 1.8 percent in surveys conducted a decade ago and 25 years ago, respectively. 

In a predominantly agricultural country, the farm sector appears to be shrinking by the day, if findings of the National Census-2021 are any indication. Per the census, the population involved in agriculture is 50.1 percent, which marks a sharp decline from 65.6 percent during the census conducted in 2011.

These statistics point toward a declining interest of the public toward agriculture, due, perhaps, to factors like dismal returns resulting from the lack of irrigation facilities and market.  

Summing up, time has come for the government to walk the talk and prove to the youth that there is no dearth of employment opportunities in Nepal, whether it’s in the farms or other sectors.   

The ongoing political debate in Nepal, centered around a choice between a republic and a monarchy, has escalated over time. While discussions are confined to the political sphere, such debates have gained momentum as Nepal’s democracy fails to deliver meaningful economic results. Nepal’s economic performance is bleak, and a deep sense of injustice and powerlessness has prevailed among its citizens. When distrust erodes people’s faith in democratic institutions, demagogues are likely to surf on the wave of political and economic populism. Compounding these factors, the government’s procrastination in taking concrete steps to find long-term solutions to fix the underlying causes has only exacerbated the crisis.

The challenges enumerated above are consequences of a more profound force that has led to a presently dysfunctional system - a manifestation of the country’s pseudo-democracy. In Nepal, the conceptualization of democracy seems confined predominantly to its intrinsic value. However, the other instrumental facet of democracy, which serves as an effective means of socio-economic and political transformation, is inadequately realized. Consequently, a nuanced and timely discourse on this matter becomes imperative, as it can only positively impact people’s lives and eventually disperse crowds of illusions.

Short-termism of the financial sector

The pervasive short-termism in Nepal’s financial sector has diverted more finance into unproductive assets such as real estate and the stock market. An increasing emphasis on quarterly returns has crowded out long-term capital investment, and economic research and development. This narrow-minded approach not only impedes innovation, productivity, competitiveness, and job creation but also exacerbates the brain drain of youth, pushing them to seek opportunities abroad.

Who, then, is responsible for the wrongdoing? The nasty form of corporate governance has continuously tempered the economy, forgoing shadow alliances with corrupt politicians and bureaucrats who, in turn, share in illicit revenue. Such extractive institutional nexus has ruptured the interlinkage between the productive sector, job creation, and overall economic progress. The resultant frustration and anxiety among the general public are tangible, contributing to the prevailing discontent and fueling political and economic unrest in the nation. To foster genuine and sustainable growth, a shift toward responsible corporate governance and a recalibration of private sector priorities is imperative.

Slow or absent government

So far, the government’s action has been ‘too little, too late’, reflecting a reactive approach to addressing economic problems, often with detrimental consequences. Nepal’s economic problems are structural and, thus, need structural overhaul rather than short-term ‘jugaad’. For instance, the government needs to be reflective of the private sector's disinterest in long-term capital investment and its preference for trading rather than bolstering its manufacturing and service base. Why do investors continuously yell that the current economic structure demoralizes long-term capital investment and lament the government’s commitment to fixing it? The role of government transcends beyond merely revenue collection, market regulation, and correcting market failures. It must demonstrate a significant investment pledge in research and development and foster an environment where the private sector can operate with confidence and a sense of long-term commitment. This calls for a paradigm shift in how economic organizations are governed, how their relationships are structured, and how economic actors interconnect.

Low level of premature deindustrialization

With globalization, developing countries, including Nepal, witnessed a rapid shift from agriculture to the service sector, bypassing industry-led economic growth much earlier than the historical average. In his 2016 study, economist Dani Rodrik argued that premature deindustrialization could negatively impact economic growth through job loss and lower comparative advantage due to poor technology. An analysis of Nepal’s economic data (1975-2016) indicates that the manufacturing sector has shrunk, and there is a need to increase the share of manufacturing in national output and create jobs. Unemployment and economic frustration could trigger political instability and illiberal politics. Most importantly, only manufacturing can fill the vacuum of Nepal’s market gap of labor demand vs skill mismatch. It is especially true for the semi-skilled and unskilled labor force who outgrew agriculture but are ill-equipped for high-tech jobs. Reindustrialization is not an unavoidable fate and is essential for a change in the present economic structure to increase employment and bolster the production base. The question is how to design tools that help achieve this directionality with a purpose.

Democracy must deliver

The public’s desire for change resonates with their expectations for increased job opportunities, enhanced livelihood, and better public services. This collective aspiration has historically fueled the political call for democracy in Nepal. Over time, if democracy fails to deliver tangible economic progress, questions naturally arise on its appropriateness, leading people to explore alternative paths. While the intrinsic values inherent in democracy are significant, they alone are insufficient for sustenance. A democratic system must also demonstrate economic efficacy, delivering concrete economic results to win over citizens for more extensive support and credibility.

This means rethinking corporate governance where both government and the private sector adopt a mission-oriented approach for overcoming structural economic challenges. Only the government, with its unparalleled authority, holds the key to steering transformative change on a scale that can redefine the dynamics of economic progress and societal interaction. But, at present, the government itself requires reawakening. The current status quo is failing too many people; therefore, a delivery-centered democratic reorientation is only a long-term solution to public dissent.

The author is a public policy candidate at Willy Brandt School in Germany. He has served as a research officer at the Office of the Investment Board Nepal. He can be reached for comments at [email protected]

India saw a single day rise of 656 new cases of coronavirus on Dec 24, pushing the active cases to 3,742 according to the Union Health Ministry. Amid the surge in cases of Covid-19, health experts have asked people to remain calm and follow Covid-appropriate behavior.

In Nepal, health experts have suggested people not to worry about the latest surge of coronavirus infection in India. They say that the mutations of the virus are always evolving, and this is one of the mutations of the omicron variant. 

“Though this strain is circulating faster, it is not very serious. It is not that scary. If you are vaccinated once or twice, or were previously infected there won’t be much severity if you get infected,” said Sameer Mani Acharya Dixit, chairperson and head of research at Intrepid Nepal Pvt Ltd.

The symptoms of the infection are similar to the infection caused by similar other variants of the coronavirus, such as headache, sore throat, fever, etc. Health experts, however, have advised people to take booster shots to prevent oneself from the severity of the infection.

What is JN.1?

JN.1 is a closely-related descendant of BA.2.86, a highly mutated strain that first worried scientists over the summer. BA.2.86 was deemed a “variant of interest” by the World Health Organization back in August.

The UN health body has recently designated JN.1 as a variant of interest, differentiating it from its parent lineage BA.2.86. The WHO defines variants of interest as strains that are worrying enough to trigger stepped up investigations of the variant by countries, like laboratory studies and field investigations of its outbreaks.

Despite its swift dissemination, the WHO has underscored that the overall risk associated with JN.1 is currently considered low based on available evidence.

In recent weeks, JN.1 was reported in multiple countries, and its prevalence has been rapidly increasing globally. But the WHO has maintained that there is no evidence to suggest any additional public health risk posed by the variant.

Concerns triggered

After first being spotted in the United States in September, the variant has spread across 41 countries.

Health experts say the JN.1 is spreading fast in all regions, probably because it has an additional mutation in the spike protein compared to the BA.2.86 variant from which it’s descended.

The outbreak of the JN.1 sub-variant of the coronavirus in India has triggered concerns among the Nepalis. Indian states Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Goa, Puducherry, Gujarat, Telangana, Punjab and Delhi have reported a slight increase in the number of cases of late. 

According to the Indian media reports nearly 93 percent of those infected have mild symptoms and are isolating at home. Among those who are undergoing treatment at hospitals across the country, only 0.1 percent are on ventilator support, 1.2 percent are admitted into the intensive care unit and 0.6 are on oxygen support.

No need to panic

Nepal currently hasn’t seen a rise in the number of coronavirus cases. The authorities however say that they are closely monitoring the development in India.

“Many people in Nepal have had the infection and people have received at least two doses of the vaccine. Therefore, the probability of severe infection is low,” said Dr Prakash Budhathoki, spokesperson at the Ministry of Health and Population. “Intensive care units, oxygen plants, and other physical infrastructure constructed during the Covid-19 pandemic can be utilized if needed.” 

Following the surge in coronavirus cases, health desks established at checkpoints and international airports have been placed on standby, and a request has been made to place patients with respiratory problems under special supervision.

“As the infection is seen in Kerala, we are relatively at lower risks. If the infection was seen in the southern areas of India that borders Nepal, it would have been quite risky, as there are high chances for the variant to enter the country in a shorter time span,” said Dr Budhathoki. 

He also informed that patients with long-standing respiratory problems have been recommended for gene sequencing. The ministry has also requested health centers to keep a check on the people visiting the hospitals with the symptoms of coronavirus and has asked them to submit a report to the ministry.

“It is anticipated that this variant may cause an increase in Sars-Cov-2 [coronavirus] cases amid a surge of infections of other viral and bacterial infections, especially in countries entering the winter season,” the WHO said in its risk assessment.

The UN health agency also noted that there is still limited evidence on how capable JN.1 is of getting round the immunity offered by vaccines.

Strengthen surveillance

The WHO has urged countries in the South-East Asia region to strengthen surveillance and for people to take protective measures in view of increasing numbers of cases of respiratory diseases, including due to coronavirus and its new sub-variant JN.1, and influenza. 

“The Covid-19 virus continues to evolve, change and circulate in all countries globally. While current evidence suggests the additional public health risk posed by JN.1 is low, we must continue to track the evolution of these viruses to tailor our response. For this, countries must strengthen surveillance and sequencing, and ensure sharing of data,” said Dr Poonam Khetrapal Singh, WHO regional director for South-East Asia. 

Considering the available, yet limited evidence, the additional public health risk posed by JN.1 is currently evaluated as low at the global level. It is anticipated that this variant may cause an increase in Covid-19 cases amid a surge in infections of other viral and bacterial infections, especially in countries entering the winter season.

 Ways to protect

 Health experts have advised people to take protective measures and seek timely clinical care when unwell. They have also urged people with high risk such as elderly citizens, people with comorbid health conditions to take vaccination against coronavirus and influenza.

“All WHO-approved Covid-19 vaccines continue to protect against severe disease and death from all variants, including JN.1,” said Dr Singh. “With Covid-19 continuing to circulate at high levels globally, countries must strengthen surveillance, sequencing and reporting to effectively manage respiratory diseases and to protect people’s health.”

To prevent infections and severe disease, the WHO advises to:

• Wear a mask in crowded, enclosed areas
• Cover up coughs and sneezes
• Clean your hands regularly
• Stay up to date with covid and flu vaccinations, especially if vulnerable
• Stay home if ill
• Get tested if you have symptoms

Nepal is much better than it was three decades ago when democracy was restored. Poverty has substantially gone down, there is road access in remote regions, health system has improved, people live longer and healthier, and the quality of education has become better.

But over the past few years, the sense of pessimism among the people has increased. Many people, mostly the youth, believe that the things in the country will not change or become worse 10-20 years down the line. There aren't many optimists around. Even the wealthy folks, those with stable, well-paying jobs and businesses are glum. 

A few days back, a preeminent social worker and businessman said: “What surprises me is that even those people who have sufficient wealth and good career are pessimistic and leaving the country. It is hard to find any young people who are optimistic about their future these days. Most people do not want to stay in the country. Youths do not think about what will happen once they go abroad, they just want to leave this country.”

Nepali media are filled with the news stories of Nepalis illegally entering America through Panama Jungle, paying up to Rs 6m to manpower agents. There are also disturbing reports about Nepali men entering Russia on visit visas and joining the army to fight in the war against Ukraine. The government is now struggling to bring back the Nepalis serving in the Russian army, those held hostage by Ukraine and those killed in the war. According to the government's official figure, approximately 2,000 youths leave the country which does not include the people with visit visas.

Today if you meet college students, you can sense their disillusionment and frustration regarding the country and their future. Even those who are holding good jobs are disaffected. Scores of people who are in the civil service are leaving their job midway to go abroad. As for the professionals who are in their forties or fifties, they seem regretful for not leaving the country when they were young. Some of them are ready to go abroad, provided they get a good opportunity. Take one example of an established businessman in his fifties, who recently said: "My father is 93 years old, he recently suggested that I advise my children to go abroad so that I can also settle there later.”  It is not just the youths, even senior citizens do not see the future in this country.

So how did we get here? Political analyst Chandra Dev Bhatta says those who are in their early twenties are the ones who feel most insecure and do not see better prospects in this country. 

“The collective insecurity has become a defining attribute of our young generation,” he says. “This sense of negativity among our youngsters has been building up for quite some time.”

He adds: “Many factors, including the politics of the country, should be held responsible for this. We have reached the point where every third person is waiting to board the next flight. Nepal is going through what scholars call a ‘polycrisis’. The permanent nature of such a crisis may push the country into ‘permacrisis’ or permanent state of crisis. This is the type of state and politics we have developed during the last couple of decades.” 

The reasons for unhappiness among Nepali citizens are innumerable. Since the 1990s, Nepal’s economic conditions have not been satisfactory. The country has come to a standstill with regard to job creation. Absence of production-based economy has increased Nepal’s dependency towards outside. 

“With more than 25 percent of national GDP, remittances have become the national lifeline. Remittances certainly have played a crucial role in reducing poverty in Nepal, but the stark reality that it produces is such that Nepal’s survival is connected with the global labor market,” says Bhatta.

Corruption is another big reason as to why Nepal and its citizens are not faring well. In fact, corruption runs so deep, from the center to the grassroots, that it is hard to imagine a government agency providing the simplest of services to a citizen without bribe money. Political parties and their loyalists have taken over high level government jobs, and their corrupt practices mostly go unpunished.

Only those who are close to the halls of power are getting job opportunities, while the rest are forced to leave the country to feed their families. “Nearly half of the population is associated with some political parties so that they can get opportunities to earn money. These people are content with the current situation of Nepal. The rest of the population do not see the future in the country,” says Bhatta.

At the heart of all these problems is a lack of political stability. Frequent government changes, and building and dismantling of coalitions among political parties have left ordinary Nepalis convinced that the country’s politics is never going to be stable enough to ensure development and economic prosperity. Political parties and their leaders are still engaged in petty power struggles and have not taken any measures to improve governance and economy.  

Growing pessimism, particularly among the youth population, is also posing a serious threat to democracy. They are gradually losing their faith in the power of vote and political parties. 

Ramesh Parajuli, a sociologist affiliated with the research institution, Martin Chautari, says the nature of pessimism runs at both individual and societal level. “Both privileged and underprivileged groups are agitated in this country. It is obvious for the underprivileged to be agitated, but the privileged group is also feeling the same way,” he says.

Nepal’s politics, Parajuli says, is in a quagmire that has failed to chart a clear course of action. 

“Politics has not taken a clear direction partially due to the electoral system we have adopted. The same set of parties and politicians are in power for decades and continue to take privileges. They are heavily involved in corruption, and this has hampered the economic growth and opportunities, thereby creating pessimism,” he adds.  

Centre for Social Inclusion and Federalism (CESIF) organized a round table discussion on ‘Small Scale Aid in Borderlands and Cross-border Ties’, reflecting on two of its publications: “Dynamics of Small-Scale Foreign Aid in Nepal’s Borderlands” and “Evolving Nepal-China Cross Border Relations and Its Impact on Borderland Citizens.”

The Executive Chair of CESIF, Vijay Kant Karna reflected in his opening remarks the importance of research on Nepal’s trade and border relations with China and India.

Madhav Sapkota, Member of Infrastructure Development Committee (HoR), Hon’ble Samjhana Thapaliya, Member of International Relations and Tourism Committee (HoR), Former Secretary Krishna Gyawali, Former Secretary Lal Shankar Ghimire and Secretary of Ministry, Commerce and Supplies, Madhu Marasini were the prominent speakers during the discussion, reads a statement issued by CESIF.

Presenting the findings on “Dynamics of Small-Scale Foreign Aid in Nepal’s Borderlands,” Milan Acharya, a researcher at CESIF, said that China’s small-scale aid focuses solely on the northern frontier districts bordering Tibet Autonomous Region. Of late, India’s small-scale aid and projects have increased in the northern region. The research found that China has a tendency to override state mechanisms and procedures and its small-scale aid is unregulated compared to that of India’s.

Sharing the findings of the research “Evolving Nepal-China Cross Border Relations and Its Impact on Borderland Citizens,” Prabisha Basnet, a researcher at CESIF said, “The Dalai Lama issue remains a major obstacle, with China viewing reverence as a security threat. Unilateral border closures, stringent checks, and declining trade also impacted cross-border marriages and cultural exchanges.”

The dialogue brought together diverse views from the parliamentarians and experts, according to the statement.

Sapkota, representing a northern bordering district Sindhupalchowk, shared his experience of China’s aid in Nepal. He specified an example of the high maintenance cost of a school constructed by China.

Samjhana Thapaliya raised concerns about the border issues with India in Saptari which need to be resolved by both neighbors, India and Nepal.

Former Secretary Krishna Gyawali congratulated CESIF for the findings and further commented on small aid in Nepal.

He said that although small aid assistance is very important, its sustainability after the departure of donors’ funding also needs to be taken into account. He saw lobbying from politicians as the most important factor for small scale funds at the local level.

Secretary Gyawali noted that the objective of small-scale aid must be aligned with national interest, with appropriate monitoring, operation maintenance and accountability mechanisms. Former Secretary Lal Shankar Ghimire expressed his concern on Nepal having an agreement with Tibet, a province of China instead of its central government.

Overall, the participants were united in expressing that small scale aid is important from both India and China. However, it needs to be regulated by the Nepali state mechanism. For this to go ahead, there has to be an institutional cohesion between ministries. 

The government has urged people not to panic about the new variant of the coronavirus identified in India. Health authorities in Nepal say they are closely monitoring the development in India.

India has been seeing a rise in the number of Covid-19 sub-variant JN.1. As per media reports, 614 new Covid cases have been detected in India as of Wednesday. Meanwhile, three people infected with the new variant have died in Kerala, per the reports.

Nepal however hasn’t seen a rise in the number of coronavirus cases as per the Ministry of Health and Population.

The World Health Organisation has designated the new variant as a “variant of interest” separate from its ancestor BA.2.86 that is commonly referred to as Pirola.

WHO maintained that there was no evidence to suggest that the new variant poses additional public health risks.

JN.1 is a closely-related descendant of BA.2.86, a highly mutated strain that first worried scientists over the summer. BA.2.86 was deemed a “variant of interest” by the WHO back in August.

The WHO defines variants of interest as strains that are worrying enough to trigger stepped up investigations of the variant by countries, like laboratory studies and field investigations of its outbreaks.

“Many people in Nepal have had the infection and people have received at least two doses of the vaccine. Therefore, the probability of severe disease is low,” said Dr Prakash Budhathoki, spokesperson at the Ministry of Health and Population.

Problems related to the respiratory system are currently increasing in India and China.

“Intensive care units, oxygen plants, and other physical infrastructure constructed during the Covid-19 pandemic can be utilized if needed,” Dr Budhathoki added.  

Health desks established at checkpoints and international airports have been placed on standby, and a request has been made to place patients with respiratory problems under special supervision.

“As the infection is seen in Kerala, we are relatively at lower risks. If the infection was seen in the southern areas of India that borders Nepal it would have been quite risky as there are high chances for the variant to enter the country in a shorter time span,” Dr Budhathoki said.  

The spokesperson also informed that patients with long-standing respiratory problems have been recommended for gene sequencing.

The ministry has requested health centers to keep a check on the people visiting the hospitals with the symptoms of coronavirus and has asked them to submit a report to the ministry.

Digital banking can be defined as the availability of banking services through online platforms, encompassing both transactional and non-transactional services. This eliminates the need for customers to physically visit brick-and-mortar banks. Technological empowerment is a key driver behind the seamless delivery of these services. Customers commonly interact with banks through various digital channels, including websites, mobile apps, social media, mobile banking, email, Viber/Messenger and call centers.

Customers can avail themselves of banking services through these digital channels or by directly visiting branches or using ATMs/POS. The array of options includes online shopping, mobile banking, third-party wallets/websites, Visa cards, payment options, POS machines and ATMs. The surge in access to finance through digital channels, such as internet and mobile banking, has been accompanied by the adoption of payment methods like debit cards, mobile wallets and QR codes.

In Nepal, where over 72 percent of the population owns mobile phones, these devices have become instrumental in promoting financial inclusion. E-wallets have emerged as convenient tools for making cashless payments. The utilization of digital channels and payment methods brings numerous benefits to individuals, facilitating easier savings, money transfers and access to financial services. Businesses stand to have improved efficiency, reduced costs and a broader customer reach. The Covid-19 pandemic played a significant role in accelerating the adoption of digital banking platforms in Nepal. Many banks responded to the challenges resulting from the pandemic by launching online account opening and e-KYC filling services during the Covid-19 lockdown. Nepal’s e-payment landscape has witnessed a remarkable surge over the past four years. 

From 2020 to 2023, Nepal's e-payment landscape experienced an impressive surge in transaction volume, witnessing a remarkable growth of over 300 percent. However, the transaction amount exhibited a more nuanced pattern, initially soaring and later experiencing a slight dip in the last year. Despite this recent decline in value, the sheer volume of transactions underscores the rapid transition toward digital payments in Nepal. As of mid-October 2023, when examining the volume of e-payment transactions, the top three channels utilized are mobile banking, e-Wallets and debit cards. Collectively, these three channels account for 66 percent of the total number of transactions conducted.

Mobile banking, debit cards and e-wallets have reshaped Nepal's financial landscape. The widespread adoption of smartphones and the expansion of mobile networks have propelled the popularity of mobile banking, providing users with features such as fund transfers and bill payments. Debit cards offer a widely accepted cashless transaction method, particularly in urban areas. Simultaneously, e-wallets have gained traction due to their simplicity and versatility.

The significant surge in the frequency of digital commerce reflects the recent expansion of Nepal's digital payment system. While there is still a considerable journey ahead, the ongoing transformation of the Nepali payment system is due to the collective efforts of relevant stakeholders, including Nepal Rastra Bank and other government agencies, the private sector, and the ultimate consumer—the people.

Nepal has embraced the digital age wholeheartedly. While this digital evolution brings convenience and efficiency, it also introduces new threats, making the safeguarding of digital assets an integral aspect of national security. One common attack in the banking sector is phishing, a technique involving the deception of individuals into divulging sensitive information, such as usernames, passwords or credit card details by posing as a trustworthy entity. Phishing attacks can target both bank customers and employees, potentially leading to unauthorized access to accounts or sensitive banking systems. Malicious software, or malware, presents another threat by infecting computer systems to gain unauthorized access, steal information, or disrupt operations. Malwares can target online banking systems, compromising customer credentials and facilitating fraudulent transactions.

Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks overwhelm a system, network, or website with traffic, causing it to slow down or become temporarily unavailable. Disruption of online banking services due to excessive traffic can result in financial losses and undermine customer confidence.

In a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack, malicious actors intercept and potentially alter communication between two parties without their knowledge. This type of attack can lead to the capture of sensitive data during online transactions, including login credentials or financial details.

Criminals may also affix devices to Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) to capture card information and Personal Identification Numbers (PINs) from unsuspecting users, leading to unauthorized withdrawals and compromising customer accounts.

Ransomware poses yet another threat, encrypting a victim's data and demanding a ransom for its release.

Social engineering involves manipulating individuals to disclose confidential information through psychological tactics. These attacks can trick bank employees into providing access to credentials or sensitive information.

To mitigate such risks, banks should implement a comprehensive framework that identifies, assesses, prioritizes and monitors IT risks. This framework should align with regulatory requirements and industry best practices. Regular vulnerability assessments, coupled with a layered security approach involving firewalls, intrusion detection systems, access controls, encryption and data loss prevention solutions are essential components of a robust cybersecurity strategy.

Automation tools can play a crucial role in tasks such as patching, configuration management and incident response. Additionally, leveraging data analytics enables proactive detection and response to threats.

As Nepal continues its digital journey, the imperative for robust cybersecurity has become increasingly evident due to a growing reliance on digital services and communication, exposing the nation to various cybersecurity threats, ranging from ransomware to data breaches. Building a team of skilled cybersecurity professionals, keeping employees informed about recent threats in the international market, conducting periodic third-party IT security audits and ensuring compliance with industry-specific regulations like PCI-DSS and Basel III are crucial steps to mitigate IT risks. These regulations address data privacy, security and operational resilience, providing a comprehensive framework for enhancing cybersecurity in the financial sector.

The author is a member of Information Systems Audit and Control Association , USA

“Just days ago, I was on the melting ice of Antarctica. Not long before, I was among the melting glaciers of Nepal. These two spots are far in distance, but united in crisis. Polar ice and glaciers are vanishing before our eyes, causing havoc the world over: from landslides and floods, to rising seas...” This is what United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said to the world leaders during the opening of the Global climate change conference, COP28.

His acknowledgment of Nepal’s problems resulting from climate change is noteworthy.

During his visit to Nepal, he journeyed to the Sagarmatha Base Camp, Annapurna Base Camp, and the birthplace of Shakyamuni Buddha, Lumbini. This illustrates his profound affection for Nepal and its people.

Guterres also participated in a high-level roundtable discussion titled ‘Call of mountains: Who saves us from the climate crisis’, organized by Nepal and chaired by Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal. During the session, he expressed his concern, stating, “It is profoundly alarming to witness the rapid melting of Nepal’s mountains. Hearing firsthand from local communities about the devastating impact on their lives is deeply distressing.”

Furthermore, he emphasized, “Nepal, alongside other vulnerable mountainous nations, bears the brunt of a crisis not of their making. Over just 30 years, the country has lost nearly a third of its ice, a direct consequence of greenhouse gas pollution warming our planet. This loss results in swollen lakes and rivers that flood, washing away entire communities.”

Guterres’ statements signify his sensitivity to the issues facing Nepal and other mountainous countries. He urged developed nations to extend support to countries like Nepal through climate funds and the pursuit of climate justice. This recognition marks a significant milestone for Nepal on the global stage.

There has long been a debate regarding the relevance of the UN due to its perceived failure to intervene effectively. However, on Dec 8, Secretary-General Guterres invoked Article 99—a rarely utilized clause in the UN Charter—to caution the Security Council about the escalating situation between Israel and Hamas, highlighting its potential threat to international peace and security.

In a letter addressed to the 15-nation council, Guterres cited the “appalling human suffering, physical destruction and collective trauma across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory” as grounds for invoking Article 99. This marked the first time in his nearly seven-year tenure that he utilized this crisis-oriented provision. The last explicit invocation of Article 99 was in 1971, amid the war leading to the creation of Bangladesh and its separation from Pakistan.

Guterres’ action underscores the UN’s capacity to intervene in humanitarian crises, reaffirming the significance of its existence. It showcases a leadership dedicated to upholding human rights and humanity in crisis situations.

The developed nations, being major funders of the UN, often have their specific reservations and expectations from the UN and its leadership. In numerous instances, past UN leaderships have aligned with the directives of developed nations. However, Guterres has demonstrated a commendable balance and timely intervention, navigating between various interests and perspectives.

He has managed a delicate equilibrium, considering the concerns and expectations of developed nations while making independent and appropriate interventions when necessary. Guterres’ ability to uphold the UN’s integrity while taking decisive action when called for signifies a balanced and nuanced approach to leadership within the international organization. Hence, it has helped to make the UN stay relevant even in a fast-changing world.

The author, a member of the Supreme Court Bar, has been practicing corporate law for around three decades

The Bagmati Province alone has a total of 1,253 people suffering from autism. Among them, 495 are in Kathmandu, 113 in Chitwan, 83 in Lalitpur, 78 in Bhaktapur and 77 in Makawanpur.

Likewise, 75 people are suffering from autism in Kavre, 70 in Dhading, 65 each in Nuwakot and Sindhuli, 54 in Sindhupalchowk, 33 in Dolakha and 17 in Rasuwa.

As per the information shared at a workshop on autism organized by the Bagmati Province Health Ministry, currently 4,886 people now are suffering from autism in Nepal.

According to the Health Ministry's expert doctor Shakar Khanal, it is estimated that around 300,000 people, including one in 100 people, have this problem based on the data of the World Health Organization. He said that four men equal to one woman have this problem.

According to him, 328 people in the mountains, 2,229 in the hills and 2,329 in the Terai have this problem according to the geographical condition.

It was informed that the problem of autism is increasing in urban areas rather than in rural areas.

As per the data provided, 1,728 people are living with the problem in villages and 3,158 people in the urban areas.

According to Surendra Bajracharya of the Autism Care Nepal Society, autism is not a disease but a problem. "Though autism is detected at the age of six months in different countries, it is found only after 18 months in Nepal", he said.

Sharing that around 0.8 percent of the population with disabilities are also having autism in Nepal, he said autism is a genetic condition and caused by genetics, environment and infection.

So far there is no treatment of the problem, he said, adding it can be improved with various types of therapy and rehabilitation measures.

On the occasion, Bagmati Province Health Secretary Deepak Tiwari said that the province government has made efforts for the first time to solve the problems seen in the issue of autism.

He said such programmes would facilitate the government's future works and collection of actual data.

Representatives from the health institutions within the province and various organizations working in the field of autism participated in the program.

The Indrawati Hydropower Station, Nepal’s first private sector hydropower project that commenced operations in 1993, has conducted a study to assess its impact on carbon emissions reduction. The study revealed an annual reduction of 41,000 tons of CO2, 62 tons of SO2, and 46 tons of NOx, along with the substitution of 1,616,141 tons of charcoal. Despite these significant achievements, the project has not been able to secure compensation from the climate fund. Given the evolving context, it is evident from the statistics that private hydropower projects, such as the Indrawati Hydropower Station, have made substantial contributions to reducing carbon emissions. Projects of this nature should be eligible for facilities from the climate fund.

In recent times, climate change has impacted Nepal's government-private hydropower projects and power plants. Two critical aspects need consideration in this context: evaluating the reduction in carbon emissions by projects promoted by the private sector and assessing the loss and damage caused by climate change. A comprehensive research effort is essential to collect relevant data. The Independent Power Producers Association of Nepal (IPPAN) and hydropower promoters should take needful initiatives in this regard. This is because income generation from hydropower should not only be their focus; attention must also be given to how a sustainable economy can contribute to the national economy, aligning with the United Nations’ call for adopting Sustainable Development Goals within the next decade.

Since 1992, the private sector has invested or is preparing to invest Rs 1,800bn in the hydropower sector. Despite challenges like the lack of transmission lines, hydropower promoters have invested a substantial amount of money in projects with a combined capacity of 42,000 megawatts. Apart from equity investments by the private sector, banks have contributed approximately 60 percent of this fund. This also includes investments by the state-owned power utility and the general public through public offerings. This confirms that energy production, a cornerstone of the green economy, has significantly contributed to reducing carbon emissions. The direct and indirect investment of citizens has increased, making a noteworthy national contribution to the critical issue of hydropower.

Examining global statistics on carbon emissions from excessive fossil fuel use and industry, the world emitted about 37.124bn tons of carbon in 2021, as per Our World in Data. Nepal’s carbon emissions during the same year were only about 0.014bn tons, accounting for 0.038 percent of the total global carbon emissions. Despite this negligible negative contribution, Nepal bears the brunt of global climate change effects. The primary reason for the increasing carbon emissions in Nepal is the growing use of imported fossil energy. To achieve a sustainable economy and reduce emissions, it is crucial to transition to green and clean energy.

While COP28 participants remain divided on the phasing out of fossil fuels, Nepal, with the potential to produce affordable green hydrogen, can leverage its position. The fossil fuel reserves may deplete, but by storing green hydrogen, Nepal can attract global interest and investment in green technology development. Nepal annually imports petrol, diesel, and LP gas worth Rs 500-600bn. Replacing these imports with hydrogen fuel can contribute to self-sufficiency in iron and urea fertilizer production. Additionally, converting hydrogen into ammonia for export could boost Nepal's income and sovereign credit rating.

Nepal's neighboring countries, such as India and China, are significant importers of fossil fuels. India imports fossil fuel worth $160bn annually, and China relies heavily on gray energy. Nepal, despite its minimal contribution to emissions, faces environmental challenges due to industrial pollution in these countries. Nepal should exert pressure on developed nations to attract domestic and foreign investment for green technology and energy. The upcoming Nepal Investment Summit in April presents an opportunity to position Nepal as an attractive destination for green and clean energy investments. Conducive policies and laws should be established to facilitate businesses in this regard.

IPPAN’s role

While there was no prior preparation for participation in the COP28, we participated in the global climate conference. During COP28, we held discussions with key individuals and organizations, including those from Japan, China, India, the USA, the United Arab Emirates, and the European Union. Topics included information about climate fund operations, technology preparedness, and experiences in reducing carbon and using hydrogen equipment. A particular emphasis was placed on understanding the carbon fund’s payment process and how hydropower plants and energy projects can directly benefit from it.

Discussions also covered the unprecedented climate change-related damages incurred by various hydropower projects and power stations in Nepal’s eastern regions due to floods and landslides last year. Insights were gathered on claiming compensation for loss and damage, managing procedures, and fund operations.

It is crucial to ensure clarity on how Nepal’s private sector can directly benefit from climate funds received from developed countries through the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. IPPAN, in collaboration with national and international agencies, should actively engage in discussions about the climate fund, payment for carbon emissions reduction, and the implementation of government action plans. IPPAN should also advocate for the representation of its officials in the Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation National Implementation Plan chaired by the Prime Minister. Establishing a dedicated climate task force and coordinating with relevant entities will be instrumental in realizing these objectives.

In today’s world, content creation involves more than just having a meaningful thing to say or a relevant issue to speak on. The formal, editing and designing aspect of the content is also important to creators. With more avenues for formal control, social media websites can expect to grow in user-base, and creative engagement with those websites might also take place for longer durations. 

Popular apps like Snapchat and Tiktok (recently banned in Nepal) are examples where editing and designing videos is a user-centric process. Such a process allows users to feel more ‘in charge’ of their content, and thus motivates them to create more. A service which withheld such creative control would not prove as satisfying to users, even if it allowed wide dissemination of their content. 

The uptake of such apps and services in the Nepali public can be attributed not only to the opportunity to raise voice but also to show one’s skills in communication and expression. Views, reactions and comments reward and recognize the ability to present in media in tandem with the words and ideas presented. In short, not just what you say but how you say it is more important than before. 

It is in part due to the disabling of ‘expression’ (how one says something) and not just curtailment of content (or ‘speech’—what one says) that there has been an outcry over the loss of freedoms since the popular TikTok app got banned by the Nepal government. Freedom of expression is concerned with more than just publishing of the content. It is concerned with how proactively one arrived at that content. Users want the government to see that doing an investigation and/or processing available data in depth are instances of the meaningful work behind an act of expression published online.

Synthetic media

A technology which has been prevalent since the advent of computers, but which has grown significantly more sophisticated today, is ‘synthetic media.’ It is about to make content creation even more exciting. Synthetic media is any media (in visual, audio and/or text format) that has been made using computers. Of late, Artificial Intelligence has been used to create synthetic media. For example, in text-based synthetic media services (ChatGPT is an example), a textually articulated idea can be transformed into a news article or essay that  the service produces by itself.

In the near future, creation of sophisticated synthetic media will be inexpensive and efficient. This bodes well for certain sections of Nepali society. Small-businesses can create advertisements for their products using synthetic media, thereby sidestepping a costly production process. In a different case, teachers can use synthetic media to present their ideas more clearly. For one, if preliminary ideas are acquired with relative ease due to the use of synthetic media in presenting, then the more technical and cutting-edge education can also be made part of the curriculum.

Extremely pertinently for Nepal’s case, synthetic media can help with public messaging on critical issues such as health and discrimination. Development organizations can create videos that are able to vividly represent the problems that they want to address. Effective communication of such societal problems would enable communities themselves to deliberate and enact solutions. 

In all, a positive picture

With the use of synthetic media, Nepal’s media landscape is likely to be both representative of a diversity of voices and rich with meaningful expression. But, the potential to create meaningful content needs to be harnessed more strongly in our case. At the very least, there is a need to look carefully to see whether a rural-urban gap is developing in the production of content. 

To gain a more organized outcome from a technological resource, the particular roles that it can play for particular groups needs to be explored clearly first. Thereafter, policies must be made with a clear goal of supporting positive outcomes for each of the groups using the technology.

Nepal, predominantly characterized by its hilly terrain, with hills covering 80.7 percent of the land, boasts numerous valleys and lakes, resembling natural view towers.

During my recent visit to Los Angeles, situated at the foothills of California, specifically Norwalk and Riverside, I marveled at the landscapes. Riverside, nestled at the base of hills, offers well-constructed trails that allow people to ascend and enjoy panoramic views of various cities. From atop one of these hills, I beheld the picturesque landscapes of Riverside, Moreno Valley, San Diego, Ontario, Los Angeles, and beyond. These cities, surrounded by hills on one side and the Pacific Ocean on the other, create a captivating spectacle.

Similarly, in Nepal, regions such as Kathmandu Valley, Pokhara, Surkhet, and Dang are embraced by hills, presenting a tremendous opportunity for the tourism industry. Nepal has the potential to develop trails providing access to these hills. By investing in road construction and cable cars, millions of visitors could be enticed to explore these elevated terrains. The breathtaking views of cities and the Himalayas from these natural view towers can be a significant attraction, much like the view towers of southern California. Constructing hiking trails on these hills can be achieved at a minimal cost, exemplified by the natural view towers in Pokhara, offering stunning vistas of the lake city.

However, the challenge lies in the lack of awareness and vision among Nepali rulers and decision-makers regarding how and where to allocate scarce resources. Random decision-making appears to be the norm, with little role for expert input. Political leaders often operate with self-interest, leading to decisions that benefit a select few. The absence of a coherent national agenda for development is evident, and questioning the actions of political parties seems futile.

Nepal can draw inspiration from iconic landmarks like the Hollywood Gate, which serves as a view tower for Los Angeles. Similarly, a hill in San Diego, housing an army camp, functions as a view tower offering stunning perspectives of the city and the Pacific Ocean.

Nepal is in a learning phase, acknowledging imperfections and seeking improvement. While mistakes are inevitable, the ability to learn from them is paramount. The prevailing egoism among rulers takes precedence over self-sacrifice, a fundamental quality for fostering a healthy and prosperous economy. Unfortunately, self-interest permeates Nepalese society, giving rise to nepotism, favoritism, and corruption. Policy decisions often legitimize these practices, hindering positive progress.

In contrast to constructing view towers, Nepal could invest in an eight-foot-wide road along the hills, facilitating trekking to hilltops. Redirecting resources from constructing towers to building footpaths around the hills of Kathmandu Valley could create a network of accessible viewpoints. Numerous spots could serve as small view towers, allowing people to appreciate the scenic beauty of the Kathmandu Valley hills. This strategic approach could offer a more sustainable and immersive experience for both locals and tourists.