Submit your Article

Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli has extended hearty best wishes to President Xi Jinping and the people of the People's Republic of China on the occasion of the Chinese New Year 2025.

"May the Year of the Snake—symbolizing wisdom, resilience and renewal—deepen Nepal and China’s enduring friendship, inspiring greater cooperation for shared progress, prosperity and harmony," PM Oli posted on the social network site X today.

Both the ruling and opposition parties are actively preparing their strategies for the upcoming winter session of Parliament, set to commence on Jan 31. Traditionally, the winter session is regarded as a ‘bills session’, but as usual, it is likely to be overshadowed by political disputes between the ruling coalition and the opposition.

The ruling parties, led by Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, are working to present a united front on key issues, particularly the government’s decision to introduce five ordinances just before the session. Prime Minister Oli has emphasized the need for all ruling parties and their leaders to defend the government’s decisions and policies. However, his concerns are growing as some senior leaders of the ruling Nepali Congress (NC) have openly criticized the government’s performance and its move to issue ordinances. NC President Sher Bahadur Deuba has urged his lawmakers to refrain from publicly criticizing the ordinances, while the party has invited experts to brief lawmakers on the benefits of these ordinances.

Despite these efforts, dissatisfaction persists within the NC. During the party’s Parliamentary Party meeting, lawmakers expressed concerns over the government’s poor performance. While Prime Minister Oli has publicly thanked the NC for its support, senior NC leaders, including Shekhar Koirala, continue to criticize the ordinances and other government actions. NC Vice-president Purna Bahadur Khadka has stressed the need for ruling parties to present a unified stance, avoiding conflicting opinions. Echoing this sentiment, UML Chief Whip Mahesh Bartaula has called on ruling parties to highlight the advantages of the ordinances to justify the government’s decisions.

Meanwhile, opposition parties are gearing up to take a more aggressive stance in Parliament. They plan to strongly criticize the government’s decision to issue ordinances and raise other contentious issues, such as proposed changes to electoral laws aimed at introducing a threshold to prevent the emergence of new political parties. Additionally, the opposition will focus on the case of Rastriya Swatantra Party Chairperson Rabi Lamichhane, who is under investigation for alleged involvement in the misappropriation of cooperative funds. Opposition parties view this as political revenge and a targeted move against Lamichhane.

The opposition also intends to highlight the lack of progress on the constitution amendment process, which was agreed upon by the NC and UML. The Parliament Secretariat has prepared a two-week calendar for the session, with top leaders from all parties set to address the House on the first day. The ordinances introduced by the government will also be presented on the same day.

The government aims to enact over a dozen laws during this session, but the political environment remains highly polarized, with sharp divisions between the ruling and opposition parties. Despite the opposition’s protests, the NC and UML, with their strong numerical strength, are well-positioned to pass legislation. Currently, 12 bills are pending in the House of Representatives, and six are in the National Assembly. To expedite the law-making process, the NC and UML have established a two-party mechanism, with UML leader Yogesh Bhattarai and NC leader Jiwan Pariyar leading the effort.

The government has tabled a bill on social media regulation in the National Assembly. Minister for Communication and Information Technology, Prithvi Subba Gurung, who is also the government spokesperson, tabled the bill. 

The proposed bill mentions economic fines and imprisonment for social media platforms and their users in nearly a dozen provisions.

The government has proposed imposing a fine of up to Rs 2.5m on individuals operating social media platforms in Nepal without permission or in violation of a ban. Any person or organization found guilty of actions detrimental to national interests could face five years of imprisonment, a fine of up to Rs 500,000, or both.

Section 18(1) of Chapter 5 of the bill states: “No one should engage in or promote any activity that undermines Nepal’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, national security, unity, independence, dignity or national interests, or causes hatred or discord based on class, caste, religion, culture, region or any other basis through social media.” Those found guilty of such acts could face five years in prison, a fine of up to Rs 500,000, or both.

The bill also proposes two years of imprisonment or a fine of up to Rs 300,000 or both for those committing cyberbullying (Section 19), and three years of imprisonment or a fine of up to Rs 500,000 or both for cyberstalking (Section 20). Cyberbullying is defined as acts of harassment, intimidation, threats, humiliation, defamation or rumor-spreading through social media or internet-connected devices. This includes sending, posting or sharing harmful or misleading text, symbols, images, sketches, photos, audio, video, audiovisual content, signals or messages as well as imitating someone’s voice to cause trouble.

Section 21 proposes three years of imprisonment or a fine of up to Rs 1.5m or both for hacking someone’s ID or information. Section 22 suggests similar penalties for phishing or imposter scams.

Section 23 proposes three years of imprisonment or a fine of up to Rs 1.5m or both for extortion or sextortion offenses. Section 24 includes three months of imprisonment or a fine of up to Rs 50,000, or both, for posting or sharing grotesque images, videos, or audios.

Section 25 proposes a penalty of up to two years of imprisonment or a fine of up to Rs 300,000 or both for spreading obscene, false or misleading content. Section 26 suggests similar penalties for uploading or disseminating deepfake videos. Section 27 proposes penalties for writing anonymously on social media, with up to three months of imprisonment or a fine of up to Rs 50,000 or both for those who create or use pseudonymous identities.

Additionally, the bill proposes an extra one year of imprisonment for those who incite or engage in criminal acts on social media, as per the prevailing law. Section 28(2) proposes double the penalty for repeat offenders of any crime under this Act. Public office holders or individuals benefiting from state funds, who commit such offenses, could face up to 50 percent additional punishment. Offenses involving the use of children could incur an additional year of imprisonment.

Laxman D Pant, executive director of Media Action Nepal, shared his concerns on social media regarding the newly-tabled bill saying that the bill aligned with the government’s agenda, if passed without any changes, could lead to a growing influence of those who suppress dissent by labeling it as a crime. This, he warned, would result in the abuse of state powers, discourage those trying to expose injustices, and cultivate a culture of silence. In his post, he also questioned why the rulers failed to remember the fundamental truth of democracy: that power is temporary, and one day, they too may find themselves walking on the streets.

The government has decided to endorse the recently issued ordinances through a fast track.

A meeting of the Council of Ministers today agreed to proceed with the endorsements of documents through a fast track by the Federal Parliament's winter session commencing on January 31, according to government Spokesperson and Minister for Communications and Information Technology, Prithvi Subba Gurung.

Talking to media in brief following the meeting, he said, "The ordinances issued by the President have been registered in the Federal Parliament. It has been decided to formulate regulations to implement the ordinances."

Stating that it is the constitutional right of the government to introduce an ordinance on a need basis, he said the recent ordinances were meant for promoting good governance and addressing economic challenges.

The meeting decided to observe the "Martyrs Day" tomorrow by organizing various programs.