Submit your Article

As we observe International Day of Happiness on March 20, it is imperative to reflect on what truly brings us joy in modern life. Every year, the World Happiness Report (WHR) publishes data on the list of happiest countries, and Finland has consistently ranked the happiest country among 143 countries for the seventh year running. The latest report puts Nepal at the 93rd place. 

Khusbu Agrawal, psychologist at Happy Mind says, “Today, happiness is linked to material possessions, success, external validation, psychological well-being, relationships, and personal development where traditional methods emphasize the significance of leading a life that is in line with one’s values and contributing to something greater than oneself, which offers a sense of purpose that goes beyond transient joys.”

She explains, “The traditional concept of togetherness and the contemporary desire for social interaction are bridged when one participates in activities that promote connections with family and friends—such as sharing meals, playing games, or volunteering for community service—putting more emphasis on meaningful activities, connections, and experiences than on material belongings.”

According to Agrawal, fostering inner peace, developing a sense of connection to something greater than oneself, and spiritual practices like meditation and prayer can help an individual manage stress and anxiety.

Siddhi Laxmi Shrestha, a local from Bhaktapur, defines happiness as the well-being found in togetherness. “I am happy when my family is healthy and doing well,” she says. “There was a time when we used to find joy without money because we exchanged things with each other and had everything within our community. But now, people chase money, social media likes, and viral fame, which isn’t a good sign.” 

For Shrestha, true happiness lies in appreciating what we have rather than dwelling on what we lack. Happiness, she says, is something one should feel at all times by embracing and appreciating what they have at present.

Aditya Dangol, counseling psychologist and mental health advocate, agrees with Shrestha. She says, “Community spaces where bonds can be created that help rekindle emotional conversations and exchange the playful side of human beings can grow a sense of belongingness and ultimately, happiness.” 

Astik Poudel, a college student, finds happiness in helping those in need. He believes that life is a one-time opportunity, and true fulfillment comes from doing good deeds rather than chasing material possessions. “I am a very spiritual person and we have only one life where our soul resides, and we must make the most of it by doing meaningful things rather than being consumed by materialism,” he says.

Acknowledging the endless nature of human desires, Poudel emphasizes the importance of practicality and selflessness. “Materialistic life makes us crave for more, but true happiness comes when we focus on helping one another. That’s what brings real contentment within ourselves.” 

Bishan Magar, who works as an inDriver, believes that financial stability is the key to happiness. For him, a good bank balance brings security and the ability to fulfill personal and family needs. “There are different aspects of happiness, but I will be happy when I have money because everyone has desires they want to fulfill, and only money can make that possible,” he says.

Magar acknowledges that happiness is subjective, but he sees wealth as a crucial factor in achieving a comfortable and fulfilling life. “If you have enough money, you can take care of yourself and your household, which ultimately brings peace of mind,” he adds.

Despite the struggles of modern life, there are individuals/organizations dedicated to spreading happiness. Poudel, who works for Divine Youth Club in Radhe Radhe feels happy when he is helping people who are in need. He says, “I feel lucky working in such a place where we help people in need and in return, receive lots of blessings and I think that is the means of happiness for me personally.”

Jiban Mani Poudel, an anthropologist, says, “People find happiness in different ways depending on their environment, age, and time. For example, we live in the city surrounded by gadgets and machines, which make our lives easier and more fulfilling. However, when we bring our grandparents here, they don’t quite feel the same. They long to return to the village because they find true happiness there, not in the city.”

Poudel says unlike in rural places, city people live close to each other, yet they seem distant and unfamiliar. 

“Talking about today’s generation, every person seems to be occupied with their phones. They no longer feel the need to socialize in real life.”

Poudel emphasizes that people today own a lot of property and have the means to fulfil all their material desires, yet they are still not completely happy. 

“Happiness is defined differently by different people and professions. As an anthropologist, we may define happiness in terms of material and cultural well-being. Psychologists, on the other hand, might define it as a state of good mental health, while doctors may see it as physical well-being. Each perspective offers a unique understanding of what it means to be truly happy,” he adds. 

The United States has reaffirmed its commitment to strengthening its partnership with the Government of Nepal.

 In response to inquiries from ApEx, a State Department spokesperson stated, “While programs that do not align with American interests have been terminated, the United States remains committed to strengthening its partnership with the Government of Nepal.”

Building on 77 years of successful collaboration, the United States is dedicated to supporting Nepal’s sovereignty by bolstering democratic resilience and promoting economic opportunities, the spokesperson added. When asked about the list of canceled projects under the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the spokesperson noted, “The US Government's review of all foreign assistance is ongoing.”

Recently, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had terminated 83 percent of USAID-run programs globally, amounting to the cancellation of 5,200 projects. While reports suggest that dozens of USAID-funded projects in Nepal have also been affected, there has been no official confirmation. Officials indicate that not only are ongoing projects at risk, but several American institutions in Nepal are also on the verge of closure. Regarding specific projects, the spokesperson said, “We do not have additional information to share on specific program awards at this time.”

On March 18, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Arzu Rana Deuba, met with Ricky Gill, Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and National Security Council Senior Director for South and Central Asia, on the sidelines of the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi. Gill assured Minister Deuba that the US would continue to support Nepal. “Gill and I also discussed Nepal-US ties, which are rooted in shared democratic and human rights values,” Rana said. “I am confident that our cooperation will continue to grow over the years.”

In a related development, a federal judge ruled that the dismantling of USAID likely violated the US Constitution. The court order requires the Trump Administration to restore email and computer access to all USAID employees, including those placed on administrative leave.

In his verdict, Judge Theodore Chung wrote, “The court finds that defendants’ actions to shut down USAID on an accelerated basis, including the apparent decision to permanently close USAID headquarters without the approval of a duly appointed USAID office, likely violated the United States Constitution in multiple ways.”

Madhes Province Chief Minister Satish Kumar Singh has alleged a major conspiracy to facilitate cheating in the Secondary Education Examination (SEE). Speaking at a press conference, CM Singh stated that since the provincial government’s decisions were not implemented, they decided to withdraw from the examination process. 

Addressing the media at the Madhes Bhawan, Singh accused the bureaucracy of non-cooperation in controlling exam leaks before the exams even began. He also claimed that exam center heads and teachers were actively involved in helping students cheat. “We attempted to improve the situation, but the presence of federal government employees in the selection of exam center heads and the disregard of provincial directives by district examination committees is unfortunate and counterproductive,” he said.  

Singh further argued that the selection process of center heads, led by the District Administration Officer and the Chief of the Education Development and Coordination Unit, was unacceptable. He stated that the committees followed previous practices, appointing school principals as center heads, prompting the provincial government to exit the exam process.  

“We aimed to boost the morale of competent teachers and ensure fair opportunities while preventing external influence in the examination process,” Singh said. “However, the provincial government's decision was ignored under pressure from vested interests. We believe that center heads should be appointed through a lottery system." “

Education and Culture Minister Rani Sharma Tiwari, who was also present at the press conference, expressed dissatisfaction with the examination system, stating that the provincial government could not remain a silent witness to irregularities. “A meeting was called with all eight district exam coordination committees and district officials to implement the lottery-based selection of center heads, but they refused. Instead, they resorted to financial dealings in the appointment process. That is why we are opposing it,” she said.

The ongoing debate surrounding Nepal’s Civil Service Bill raises concerns about the effectiveness of bureaucratic reforms and their potential to improve public service delivery. While the bill is a step toward modernizing the Civil Service Act, many argue that it fails to address the core issues plaguing the bureaucracy, including inefficiency, lack of motivation, and poor service delivery at the local level. The real question is whether the bill will bring about meaningful change or simply become another bureaucratic hurdle.

A decade has passed since the promulgation of the Constitution, yet the Federal Civil Service Act, has not been passed. The lack of this foundational law has contributed significantly to the problems at the local level. For example, while municipalities are designed to be self-governing entities, they face severe staffing shortages and inefficient resource management. The education branches of municipalities, such as those with 15 schools, are staffed with just four positions, including a deputy secretary, while rural municipalities with over 80 schools face similar issues. These staffing arrangements are meant to be a solution but have instead become a significant source of dysfunction.

Moreover, senior employees are often posted under junior subordinates, violating principles of natural justice and further exacerbating internal tensions. The mechanical process of adjusting staff has created more problems than it has solved, and currently, over 300 municipalities are struggling with administrative failures, which have become a chronic issue in the federal system.

The root causes of bureaucratic inefficiency are complex and multifaceted. Are employees demotivated because they lack a working environment conducive to productivity? Is it because they don’t have clear career development paths or feel marginalized in decision-making processes? These questions must be addressed before any meaningful reform can take place.Without a proper working mechanism and clear standards for promotion, transfer, and career development, employees often lack the motivation to perform at their best. Additionally, the public service system in Nepal remains highly politicized, with leaders often selecting personnel based on political loyalty rather than merit or competence. This system leads to inefficiencies, as unqualified individuals are placed in key positions, affecting the overall functioning of government bodies.

The current Civil Service Bill fails to tackle these deep-rooted issues. While it introduces provisions regarding the appointment of administrative heads in municipalities, the role of the provincial secretary, open competition quotas, and retirement age, these measures do little to address the fundamental problems within the bureaucracy. By focusing on these surface-level changes, the bill misses the opportunity to bring about real structural reform.

Currently, many employees in Nepal’s civil service are trapped in a system that does not reward merit or effort. Career progression is often determined by political considerations rather than performance, leading to widespread dissatisfaction. Moreover, the lack of effective leadership and clear communication further contributes to poor morale within the bureaucracy.

A cultural shift is needed within the civil service, one that prioritizes professionalism, accountability, and public service over political loyalty. This can only be achieved through comprehensive reform that goes beyond changes in the law and addresses the underlying values and systems that govern bureaucratic behavior.

The Civil Service Bill, as it stands, fails to address the core issues within Nepal’s bureaucracy. To improve public service delivery, governance, and development, a more comprehensive and thoughtful approach to reform is needed. The bill must go beyond surface-level changes and focus on creating a civil service that is motivated, accountable, and capable of meeting the needs of the people.

Ultimately, the key to improving bureaucratic performance lies in addressing the root causes of inefficiency, such as political interference, lack of motivation, and ineffective career development systems. If these issues are not tackled head-on, any new law or bill will simply perpetuate the existing problems rather than solve them.