Submit your Article

On March 5, the people of Nepal delivered a historic verdict that fundamentally reshaped the country’s political landscape. The Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP), led by Rabi Lamichhane, secured a commanding supermajority, winning more than 5m proportional votes and 182 out of 275 seats in the House of Representatives. This 66 percent majority is more than a mere electoral landslide—it is a generational mandate for transparency, accountability, and accelerated economic progress. Under the Constitution of Nepal 2015, few mandates have been as decisive. The election results reflected a deep public desire to move beyond rhetoric toward a governance model defined by tangible outcomes. Citizens placed their confidence in a new generation of leaders who committed to building a ‘hardworking nation’. 

For Prime Minister Balendra Shah, this mandate provides both the legitimacy to lead boldly and the responsibility to implement reforms that reach every household. These insights may appear straightforward, yet they carry profound strategic significance for the nation.

A roadmap for reform

Within days of taking office, Prime Minister Shah introduced the ‘One Hundred Agendas for Governance Reform’, an ambitious framework structure around five strategic pillars:

• Governance and institutional integrity: Restructuring provincial council, anti-corruption, and digital governance
• Public service and accountability: Streamlining procurement and grievance handling,
• Economic transformation: Investment in energy, tourism, and trade
• Social development: Improvements in health, education, and agriculture
• Equity and social protection: Ensuring inclusion and a strengthened social safety net

At the absolute center of this agenda is fiscal federalism, the system governing how money is collected, shared, and spent across all tiers of government. Without a structural reform, the RSP’s broader agenda risks remaining aspirational rather than actionable. The ongoing debate over provincial councils has revealed itself to be both inefficient and unnecessarily costly. A more effective alternative would be to empower mayors, rural municipality chairs, and ward chairs to elect one provincial lawmaker from each district in respective province, thereby creating a streamlined body of 77 representatives. This approach would not only reduce electoral expenditures but also ease the administrative burdens, and enhance the efficacy of the provincial governments that plague the current council system. 

By adopting such a model, Nepal could establish an exemplary case of provincial council demonstrating that federal institutional reform can be both pragmatic and fiscally responsible.

The reality of fiscal imbalances

Data from the Financial Comptroller General Office highlights a widening gap between Nepal’s federal aspirations and its fiscal reality. In FY 2024/25, the federal government collected Rs 1.032trn in revenue, while provincial and local governments collected Rs 107.29bn and Rs 133.07bn, respectively. Although total revenue reached Rs 1.273trn, its distribution remains highly centralized. 

On the expenditure side, total spending reached Rs 1.844trn, with federal spending dominated by recurrent expenditure. Meanwhile provincial and local governments, the tiers closest to citizens, remain resource-constrained. This results two structural challenges:

• Vertical imbalance: The federal government dominates revenue collection, while provincial and local governments bear primary responsibility for service delivery. This mismatch forces provinces and local governments to rely heavily on federal fiscal transfers. Such dependency undermines autonomy and contradicts the principle of self-rule. Nepal has centralized fiscal power while decentralizing expenditure obligations, a paradox that weakens federalism.
• Horizontal imbalance: Significant disparities exist across provinces and municipalities. Wealthier federal policies benefit from larger populations, better infrastructure, and richer natural resources, while others lag behind. Over time, weak ‘own-source revenue’ generation has embedded a culture of dependency. Without corrective measures, fiscal federalism risks widening and deepening inequality rather than reducing it.

Unlocking new revenue sources

To break this fiscal dependency, the RSP government must promote scientific and sustainable use of natural resources to generate local wealth. This includes strengthening agricultural value chains, promoting non-timber forest products, tourism, entertainment, processing hub, digital center, and engaging in the global climate economy through initiatives such as biochar production and carbon markets. 

The federal government should also develop model revenue laws to support federal polity in exercising their constitutional taxation powers. These should cover agricultural income tax, property tax, vehicle tax, and land registration fees, etc. Standardization will reduce legal ambiguity and improve compliance. Additionally, local governments should establish dedicated revenue units, supported by modern IT infrastructures, to enhance financial management, tax administration, data generation and evaluation.

Expanding non-tax revenues and environmental levies

A sustainable fiscal architect cannot rely solely on taxation. Nepal must expand non-tax revenue from forests, water resources, minerals, and public enterprises dividends. The National Natural Resources and Fiscal Commission (NNRFC) should lead this effort through scientific and transparent resource-sharing frameworks. The introduction of environmental levies, such as carbon taxes, pollution charges and congestion fees, can align fiscal policy with environmental sustainability while generating additional revenue. 

Similarly, revenue from riverbed materials, such as sand, stones, boulders, pebbles, soils and minerals, etc., should be systematically integrated into local budgets. Categorizing these into short- and medium-term revenue streams will improve fiscal planning and service delivery.

Reforming intergovernmental transfers

Fiscal transfers are the lifeblood of federalism, ensuring that resources align with responsibilities. However, Nepal’s current system still reflects ‘unitary mindset’ within the bureaucracy in the Singhdurbar, where transfers are treated as discretionary support rather than constitutional entitlements. The NNRFC must be strengthened into a technically capacity, research-driven institution rather than a ‘bureaucratic parking spot’. This requires multidisciplinary expertise including economists, engineers, data analysts, geographers, regional planners, and social scientists to develop evidence-based allocation formulas. These formulas should consider population, geography, development indicators, human development and fiscal performance. Additionally, a Grievance Redressal Mechanism should be established to address intergovernmental fiscal disputes efficiently and transparently.

The path to effective governance

Nepal’s transition toward genuine federalism requires a shift from central patronage to federal polity empowerment. The 2026/27 budget must move beyond short-term transfers (grants) and enable federal polity to achieve fiscal sustainability. Fiscal federalism is not merely a technical reform; it is essential for translating public investment into tangible improvements in people’s lives. By prioritizing transparency, accountability and measurable outcomes, the RSP government can fulfill the promise of federalism.  

Nepal stands at a critical crossroads. The public has rejected the status quo and entrusted a new generation of leaders with a decisive mandate. They expect results, not rhetoric.  If fiscal federalism is reformed to be efficient, equitable, and citizen-focused, it can drive inclusive prosperity. If not, structural weaknesses will persist, and public trust will erode. Federalism was achieved through immense sacrifice. Allowing it to deteriorate into a mere bureaucratic formality would undermine that achievement. The RSP government must deliver tangible results ensuring that the progress is measured not in slogans, but in improved livelihoods and prosperity. 

Sudan Gurung, Nepal's youngest Home Minister, was appointed on March 27 and has quickly emerged as one of the most talked-about figures in the country. He is also the founder of the organization Hami Nepal. His appointment to the Home Ministry came as a surprise to many observers.

Since taking office, he has worked efficiently toward his stated goals and made decisions that have captured public attention. On his very first day after taking the oath, he ordered the arrest of former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and former Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak, a move that is rare in political history anywhere in the world.

The arrests were made over their alleged role in the deaths of dozens of people during the GenZ protests that toppled the government in September last year. The move has been widely praised by those who view it as a strong stance on accountability.

Gurung also personally visited Nepal Police Headquarters, where he directed officers to adopt a policy of zero tolerance against corruption and irregularities, stating that no one involved would be spared. Following this, several arrests were made in connection with money laundering cases. He has since been seen visiting police offices, meeting victims, and closely monitoring law enforcement operations. He has also reinforced a no-VIP-treatment policy on the road system.

His work has drawn comparisons to Anil Kapoor’s character in the Bollywood film Nayak. However, his positive attitude and unconventional approach have sparked debate. On social media, he faced criticism over older photos from when he was a DJ. More recently, his frequent unusual posts—sometimes consisting of numbers only, possibly representing arrest figures—have added to the conversation.

According to Hemanta Malla Thakuri, former Deputy Inspector General of Nepal Police, “Maturity is essential for someone holding a position like this. While the actions he has been taking may appear proactive, many of these tasks are actually the responsibility of the police, not the minister. Traffic management, for example, is not a minister's role—it requires trained traffic police personnel. When a minister steps into such operational duties, it does not necessarily send a positive message to the public.”

Abhinash Nagaju,26, from Bhaktapur said, “Based on his recent actions, I would say he's doing a good job. But at the same time, I feel a bit unsure. While his work appears positive, it sometimes feels like it might be staged, done more for show than substance.” He added that Gurung's social media posts are a good idea, as long as the information shared is not sensitive or related to national security. “It helps people like us understand what's actually going on,” he said. “I think he's trying to win public trust for now, and perhaps he’ll gradually evolve and raise his level as he goes.”

Sushila Hada from Suryabinayak said Gurung has been doing well, but the real challenge is whether he can sustain it. “He is still in a learning phase, and it seems like he is learning and working at the same time.” On his social media presence, she noted that while updates are not always consistent, he must now be more cautious than ever as a public figure. “His platforms can become a source of truth not just for the Nepali public, but also for international media and observers.” She added that there is no fixed rulebook for how a Home Minister should conduct himself, so he should follow his own moral compass while staying within proper boundaries and not being overly influenced by others.

A woman who did not wish to be named offered a similar perspective: “He doesn’t need to rush or try to do everything at once. He should take a moment to breathe. It feels like he’s acting out of excitement right now, which is understandable. But if he continues at this pace, there may come a point where, if he slows down or fails to deliver something significant, he could end up facing criticism or controversy.”

Spokesperson at the Armed Police Force of Nepal, Bishnu Prasad Bhatta, expressed optimism: “We have a lot of hope in our new Home Minister. He is very action-oriented, and we truly appreciate his efforts. He has past experience working with national organizations and has been helpful in the past.” Bhatta added that while Gurung demonstrates strong teamwork, working without coordination could hamper his effectiveness. “He has been actively involved in conducting training and programs with the team, and has urged us to be prepared for future challenges and rescue operations. Overall, he is expected to address our problems and find effective solutions.”

Divya Shrestha, 21, described Gurung as a confident and outspoken political figure who makes a visible effort to stay connected with the public. “On social media, his bold and engaging presence helps him connect with supporters, though his tone can occasionally feel overly informal for someone in such a senior role. He shows clear promise, but a more measured, disciplined, and professional approach will be important as he grows into the responsibilities of the position.”

Shiva Tamang, 25, from Swayambhu echoed similar thoughts: “His actions reflect practical, ground-level engagement, though questions sometimes arise around consistency and long-term vision. His communication is bold and direct, but can occasionally come across as emotional or confrontational. For a role as significant as Home Minister, a higher degree of professionalism, discipline, and balanced communication is essential. He has clear potential, but a more refined and consistent approach will be crucial as he settles into this responsibility.”

Ayush Basnet from Nala offered a measured take: “Gurung is a capable politician, though he appears to lack experience at this stage. His actions come across as very straightforward, sometimes in ways we haven’t been accustomed to seeing. It also feels like he may be signaling intentions ahead of bigger moves. For now, his style of working is gradually making me more appreciative of his approach.”

Amid his recent activities, Gurung was also linked to a controversy over land he leased near Phewa Lake in Pokhara for an adventure tourism project worth Rs 15–20m. The work was halted after authorities identified the site within a restricted 65-metre buffer zone, with conflicting claims emerging between Gurung and the landowner.

He held a meeting with Swiss Ambassador Danielle Meuwly, requesting Switzerland’s cooperation in investigating whether illicit funds from Nepal have been deposited in Swiss banks. He also conducted an on-site inspection of flood-prone areas along the Roshi River in Kavrepalanchok, assessing risks to settlements and infrastructure and directing authorities to strengthen preparedness and coordination ahead of the monsoon season.

Gurung's first two weeks in office have been marked by bold decisions, high visibility, and an unconventional style that has quickly set him apart. While many praise his energy, accountability-driven actions, and direct engagement with the public, others raise concerns about consistency, experience, and the need for a more measured approach.

As he navigates the responsibilities of one of the country’s most critical ministries, Gurung stands at a defining moment, where sustaining momentum, refining his leadership style, and balancing action with strategy will determine whether his early promise translates into lasting impact.

KP Sharma Oli and Ramesh Lekhak were released from police custody on Thursday following a Supreme Court order, with authorities continuing their investigation into a homicide-related case.

The court granted the release of the former prime minister and former home minister on the condition that they appear before police whenever summoned. The decision came during a hearing on a habeas corpus petition filed on their behalf. While ordering their release, the court instructed investigators to either complete the probe by Friday, or proceed with their task while keeping the accused outside custody.

Police said the release of Oli and Lekhak does not indicate a lack of evidence but reflects procedural constraints. Investigators were unable to complete key tasks within the court-mandated timeframe and could not submit the case to the government attorney’s office by the deadline.

Following approval from the government attorney’s office, Kathmandu police formally released Oli and Lekhak. Now that they are no longer in custody, authorities are no longer bound by the 25-day deadline typically required to file charges in custodial cases. Since the case involves alleged homicide and the accused are out on bail, there is no strict legal deadline to register the case in court.

Over the 13-day detention period, investigators reviewed findings from the Karki Commission, which had recommended legal action against both leaders. Authorities also collected statements from victims’ families, injured individuals, and the accused themselves, in the presence of government attorneys.

Police compiled supporting materials including site inspection reports, inquest and postmortem reports, and other relevant documents. Police have not yet submitted the investigation report to the government attorney’s office, stating that the investigation work is still incomplete.

Tasks such as recording statements from individuals related to the incident as witnesses, preparing documentation, and collecting incident reports from the doctors involved in the treatment are still pending. According to police, key aspects—such as how the situation escalated to the point where gunfire occurred, who played what role at the scene, and who gave what kind of orders—are still under investigation.

The Karki Commission report holds both Oli and Lekhak responsible and recommends charges under Sections 181 and 182 of Nepal’s National Penal Code. Section 181 pertains to causing death through negligence. Despite their release, officials have emphasized that the investigation remains active and further legal action will depend on the strength of evidence gathered in the coming days.

The race for Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives took a dramatic turn on Thursday. Rastriya Prajatantra Party (RPP) parliamentary party leader Gyanendra Shahi claimed that Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) Chair Rabi Lamichhane had verbally agreed to support the RPP’s bid for Deputy Speaker. However, the ruling party instead backed the Harka Sampang-led Shram Sanskriti Party.

The RSP announced its endorsement of 26 years old Rubi Kumari Thakur of the Shram Sanskriti Party, virtually ensuring her victory. With this backing, the alliance commands 189 seats in the lower house—well above the two-thirds majority threshold—placing Thakur far ahead of the RPP candidate Saraswati Lama. Thakur’s candidacy was proposed by Shram Sanskriti lawmaker Aaren Rai and was seconded by RSP’s Ashok Kumar Chaudhary.

RPP’s Shahi publicly accused Lamichhane of reneging on a prior commitment. “We will see how much he fulfills his promise,” Shahi told reporters.

The emerging alliance is notable given past tensions. Harka Sampang, chair of the Shram Sanskriti Party, has been a vocal critic of the RSP-led government both inside and outside Parliament. Despite this, the two parties have now aligned, giving the ruling bloc a commanding two-third majority.

The Shram Sanskriti’s path to the Deputy Speakership appears to have been shaped by internal rifts within the RPP, despite an earlier verbal understanding between leaders.

A source told ApEx that the RSP had initially preferred Khusbu Oli as a consensus candidate for Deputy Speaker. However, RPP parliamentary party leader Shahi instead pushed forward Saraswati Lama, who is also the spouse of RPP leader Buddhiman Tamang.

Although Oli seconded Lama’s nomination, she was reportedly seeking the post herself. After learning of the internal discord within the RPP, the RSP recalibrated its position and chose to back the Shram Sanskriti Party’s candidate. 

The election follows the unopposed appointment of Dol Prasad Aryal as Speaker on April 5. Constitutional provisions require that the Speaker and Deputy Speaker be from different parties and of different genders.