Submit your Article

What should be the size of the army in a country like Nepal?  Before the Maoist insurgency began in 1996, there were approximately 60,000 personnel in the Nepali Army. The number was significantly increased to fight the Maoist insurgents, and today the NA is 96,477 strong. In 2001, the government also founded the Armed Police Force, which acted as a paramilitary unit, to support counterinsurgency operations. 

Talks about resizing or ‘rightsizing’ the NA first found prominence after the Maoists joined the peace process with the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in 2006. At the time, it was the right thing to do, since the former Maoist fighters were also being integrated into the national army, which would have increased the troop numbers and the budget.  

The CPA says: “... This includes, among other things, rightsizing, democratic restructuring reflecting the national and inclusive character and imparting training to the Nepali Army on the values of democracy and human rights.”  While the inclusive component of the CPA has already been implemented by the NA, the parts about rightsizing and restructuring have not. 

The size of the military has once again entered the national debate, and the NA is not taking it lightly. Responding to some media reports and opinion pieces, Army chief Prabhu Ram Sharma in March blamed “outsiders” for making comments about the required NA troop numbers. He didn’t name any particular individual or institution, but hinted that these “outsiders” were acting on the behest of foreign countries.

A few days back, the issue about the size of the Army was brought up in the National Assembly by CPN-UML lawmaker Bimala Rai Paudyal. Addressing the assembly, she said that there must be a review on whether the Ministry of Defense needs the current size of the national army.
“There aren’t any internal conflicts and there aren’t any chances of war from our neighbors,” argued Paudyal, also a former foreign minister.
Her remarks didn’t go down well with the military circle, as well as some politicians. Paudyal faced strong criticism, including from former Army generals, for stoking an unnecessary debate. 

Those against the idea of revising the size of the NA are of the view that this is not the right time to be debating about the issue. 

But Paudyal remains firm on her position. “Shouldn’t we evaluate the current scenario?” she says. “It is not necessarily a call for downsizing the army, but rather a suggestion to review whether to downsize or upsize the army.”   

She asks why there should be a controversy whenever we raise military matters. “These issues warrant serious deliberations and extensive research, especially considering our transition to federalism and the emergence of heightened border security threats,” says Paudyal. “Perhaps, we may even require a stronger army.”

The debate on the size of the NA is not a new one; it is a part of the CPA signed between the government and the Maoist party. The Interim Constitution 2007 had also mentioned about the size and democratization of the national army. The part 20 of Interim Constitution states talks about determining the appropriate number of the Army, its democratic structuring and inclusivity.  

In 2009, the Ministry of Defense had formed a committee to suggest ways for the democratization of the NA, but the report was never made public.

In compliance to the Nepali law which states that 45 percent of all vacant government positions be reserved for excluded groups, the Army in 2006, amended its Army Act. As per the amendment, out of the 45 percent reserved position within the NA, 20 percent of the seats are reserved for women, 32 percent for Janajati, 28 percent for Madhesi, 15 percent for Dalit and 5 percent for remote regions. But as far as the issue of rightsizing is concerned, there have been discussions in the academic sector but not at the state-level.

The Maoist party, which vehemently raised the issue of resizing the NA during the time of peace process, seems to have abandoned the topic now. As per the Maoist party’s demand, the Nepali Congress and UML too had agreed to mention this issue in the CPA, much to the displeasure of the Army. 

Deepak Prakash Bhatta, a security expert, says there can be discussions on resizing the NA only if the political parties, not individual leaders, officially make the position on it.  “Some people have spoken about it, but what is the position of political parties?” says Bhatta.

Both incumbent and retired NA officials suspect that some “foreign powers” are fuelling the debate.
One retired NA official says the NA does not have any objection to such a debate, but the recent noise about reviewing the size of the national army lacks maturity. “This is a very sensitive and comprehensive issue which requires in-depth study and deliberations,” he says.  

Purna Chandra Silwal, retired major general of the NA, says in a precarious geopolitical scenario marked, among others, by the Ukraine war and increasing Sino-Indian hostilities, countries have become more serious than ever before about their existence as their ballooning defense spending shows. “But, paradoxically, some of our leaders and opinion-makers are calling for downsizing of the national army,” he adds.

Major political parties have so far chosen to steer clear from the debate. UML senior leader Shanker Pokhrel says this is “an ill-timed debate” because we are passing through a political instability, and anarchism is creeping into society. “The size of Nepali Army is not only related to security aspects but also the international peace mission,” says Pokhrel.  

The current debate on the sizing of NA itself is problematic because it is too focused on downsizing it, instead of holding discussions on determining the right size. There could be discussions about the size of the army, experts say, but it can be decided only after assessing the long-term internal and external threats. Of late, beyond providing security, NA is also engaged in big development projects as well. 

Krishna Prasad Bhandari, NA spokesperson, says the Army is aware and informed about the ongoing discussions about the national army.  “The Nepal Army has been effectively and successfully performing the tasks provided by the government and mentioned in the constitution,” he says. 

Defense Minister Purna Bahadur Khadka has also defended the current number of NA in Parliament.  Speaking in the meeting of National Assembly Khadka on Thursday, he said the number of the army is determined on the basis of the country's geographical location, national necessity and current international scenario. He also said it is the government who decides the number of military personnel based on the recommendation of the National Security Council. 

Waste management problem of Kathmandu has resurfaced once again due to the protests by residents of Kakani Rural Municipality in Nuwakot and Dhunibesi Municipality in Dhading. They have blocked the transportation of waste trucks to Banchare Danda, the designated landfill site, citing non-implementation of previous agreements with the Kathmandu Metropolitan City (KMC). 

The agitating locals claim that despite signing an agreement a year ago, the KMC has failed to fulfill its obligations.

Suman Tamang, chairperson of Kakani Rural Municipality, says that it is not feasible for people to live among fetid waste, while KMC does nothing. “Kathmandu should manage its waste in alternative sites or relocate the affected residents. If this issue remains unaddressed, waste disposal will continue to be disrupted,” he says.

Around 50 waste trucks are stuck between Sisdole and Banchare Danda. The residents have accused the KMC of deceiving them by not adhering to the agreements, which included the segregation of biodegradable and non-biodegradable waste and the management of only degradable waste at the landfill site. 

Recently, Kakani Rural Municipality decided to charge an entry fee for vehicles carrying garbage. However, local residents opposed this decision, saying that public health is more important than revenue. 

An appeal was filed in the Supreme Court against levying of the entry fee for garbage trucks, resulting in an interim stay order preventing the collection of fees. 

The KMC team attempted to negotiate with municipal officials, but to no avail. 

“The locals and municipal officials asked us to negotiate with the federal government instead. They are obstructing the route but they want us to negotiate with the federal government,” says Nabin Manandhar, the KMC spokesperson.

The main demand of the protesting locals is acquisition of 3,000 ropanis of land surrounding the waste disposal site, which is beyond the KMC’s capabilities alone. Manandhar says that the KMC is in contact with the federal government regarding this matter.

Until last year, garbage from the 18 local areas in Kathmandu Valley was managed at Sisdole, but it was subsequently relocated to the nearby Banchare Danda landfill site, which lies on the border of Nuwakot and Dhading districts

There are many students in my contact with degrees from prestigious institutions like MIT and Cornell University. They want equivalent certificates from the Tribhuvan University (TU), but the latter doesn’t recognize them. TU’s short shrift is a huge demotivator for those professionals, who return home to contribute in their respective fields, leaving luxurious lives abroad. I know many of these people. Isn’t it ironic that the same certificate gives you a job in the World Bank, but not in the TU?

This problem has been there for two decades as nobody has tried to resolve it. The University Grant Commission should be authorized to grant equivalency. Currently, TU’s faculty board has the authority to give an initial go-ahead for equivalency. Due to vested interests, board members don’t give a go-ahead easily.

The Education Ministry, UGC and the TU should form a committee and resolve this problem once and for all.

The author is former Vice-chancellor of Tribhuvan University 

Park Tae-Young is newly appointed Ambassador of South Korea to Nepal. He is currently busy meeting political leaders, government officials and representatives from other sectors of Nepali society. Park recently visited the office of Annapurna Media Network and interacted with the AMN team on wide-range of bilateral issues. Excerpts:

What is your view on Nepal-South Korea relationship?

Very soon, we are completing 50 years of the establishment of bilateral relations. Due to our strong relations, we have collaborated closely in various areas. As we commemorate this momentous occasion, I am contemplating how we can honor and celebrate the friendship between Nepal and South Korea.

How do you find the relationship between Nepal and Korea at a people-to-people level?

Having taken up my position in Nepal just 50 days ago, I have been actively engaging with government agencies to strengthen bilateral ties. I am focused on fostering relations at the people’s level which involves meeting and connecting with diverse individuals. During my interactions, I had the opportunity to meet numerous individuals with connections to Korea, including businessmen who have relatives there. The Employment Permit System (EPS) has undeniably played a significant role in fostering the relationship between Nepal and South Korea at the people’s level. At present, there are approximately 40,000 Nepalis employed in South Korea, and the interest in working there continues to grow. Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, we were seeing over 40,000 South Korean tourists visiting Nepal annually. The South Korean people are attracted to Nepal’s natural scenery and find visiting Lumbini, the birthplace of Gautama Buddha, particularly appealing. It is noteworthy that there is a balanced flow of people between the two countries. The relationship is characterized by mutual harmony and respect, rather than being one-sided. Furthermore, numerous development programs contribute to the strengthening of bilateral ties.

What initiatives are being undertaken to attract Korean investors to Nepal?

Recognizing the significance of economic cooperation in strengthening bilateral relations, we are actively pursuing initiatives to attract Korean investors to Nepal. South Korea currently holds the fourth position in terms of foreign direct investment in Nepal. Samsung’s television assembly plant is the recent example of South Korean investment in Nepal. It seems South Korean multinationals are eager to invest in Nepal.

In which sector of Nepal are Korean investors particularly interested in?

Korean investors have shown a strong interest in Nepal’s hydropower sector. They recognize that Nepal possesses the second richest water resources in the world. Currently, two hydropower projects with South Korean investment have been completed, while the construction of the Upper Trishuli-1 Hydropower Project (216 MW) is underway and expected to begin generating electricity in 2027. These ventures could significantly contribute to Nepal’s electricity sector. Moreover, Korean companies are also in the construction of transmission lines. In this regard, coordination efforts are being made with the Ministry of Energy and Nepal Electricity Authority. It is not only the larger multinational companies that we seek to attract; we also encourage medium-sized companies to invest in Nepal. I am committed to taking the necessary initiatives to facilitate such investments.

Hi-Mo, a company with South Korean investment, has been producing wigs in Nepal for the past five years. The company employs over 600 Nepali women and exports wigs to South Korea and Japan. Nepal boasts a strong workforce and benefits from its strategic location, situated between two of the world’s most populous countries. This advantageous position creates a conducive industrial environment in Nepal. As investors primarily seek profitability, we are actively collaborating with Nepali government agencies to ensure that foreign investors receive the same facilities and returns as their Nepali counterparts.

How would you evaluate the role of the Nepali government in attracting foreign investment?

The Nepali government is making concerted efforts in this regard. We, too, are making efforts from our side. However, it is crucial for Nepal to effectively communicate to potential investors that it offers a conducive business environment and promising returns on investment.

What type of workforce is essential for the development of a country?

A competent and skilled workforce is crucial for the development of any country. A notable example is South Korea, which had limited natural resources compared to Nepal but succeeded in its development journey due to its abundant labor force. The significant contribution of a skilled workforce played a key role in South Korea’s progress. Similarly, observing the investments made by Nepali citizens in the education of their children, I am optimistic that Nepal is on the path to cultivating an educated workforce. Vocational skill training is being provided in Butwal with the support of the South Korean government. We are also prepared to organize similar training programs in the Madhes and Gandaki provinces. My aspiration is to establish vocational training centers with South Korean support across all seven provinces of Nepal.

In terms of business environment, how do you perceive the situation in Nepal?

Nepal is ranked relatively low, currently placed 94th among countries worldwide. It indicates that there is room for improvement, not just in Nepal but also across South Asia. In the early days, South Korea faced challenges due to a lack of coordination and harmonious relations between employees and businessmen. It is essential for the Nepali government to listen to the voices of the private sector and foster a collaborative environment. By working in coordination, both the government and the private sector can contribute to improving the overall situation and creating a more conducive business environment.

Is it possible to increase the number of Nepali workers under the EPS system?

Nepali workers who have participated in the EPS have made significant contributions to South Korea’s industrial sector and overall economy. Remittances sent back home by these workers have also benefited Nepal and its citizens. Workers from 16 countries are benefiting from EPS. An estimated 90,000 is expected to head to South Korea this year through EPS. South Korea has specifically demanded 15,000 workers from Nepal. Since employers also prefer Nepali workers, they have placed more demands. Currently, over 14,000 Nepalis have already left for South Korea, and it is estimated that more than 20,000 workers will go to South Korea through EPS this year. Among 16 countries, Nepa is the largest contributor of workers to South Korea through EPS this year.

How long will the EPS program continue?

There have been concerns regarding the potential closure of the EPS system. However, due to the ongoing insufficiency of workers in South Korea, the demand for Nepali workers continues to increase steadily. I firmly believe that the EPS program will continue to thrive for a significant period. Workers who participate in this program receive salaries on par with Korean citizens, earning more than Rs 200,000 per month. Notably, Nepali workers have not only earned income but have also acquired valuable skills during their time in South Korea. These skills will play a pivotal role in shaping Nepal’s future. Soon after my arrival in Nepal, I came across a news article highlighting the success story of a returnee from South Korea who was creating jobs by opening an industry in Nepal. Such inspiring examples are on the rise, demonstrating that Nepal is steadily moving closer to prosperity.

How can the skills learned in Korea be utilized in Nepal?

In collaboration with the Korean International Cooperation Agency (KOICA), we have initiated a reintegration program to support returning workers in starting businesses and providing vocational education. Through this program, returnee workers learn how to invest. The success of this initiative will lead to the opening of more industries and the creation of additional job opportunities. It is crucial for media outlets, including Annapurna Media Group, to work for harnessing the skills and investments of these returnee workers.