Submit your Article

Let me start by admitting that I found Rajkummar Rao a little strange as an actor (meaning I thought he wasn’t really actor material as he didn’t look very appealing on screen). So I didn’t watch his films until Covid-19 lockdowns happened and we were stuck at home with our evenings pretty much free. Then, on a friend’s recommendation, I watched a few of his movies like ‘Shaadi Mein Zaroor Aana’, ‘Trapped’ and ‘Stree’. There was no doubt that he was a phenomenal actor who portrayed the characters he played with conviction and courage.

The three films I watched were all different from one another; one was a romance, another was a thriller, while Stree was a horror-comedy. The films worked because of Rao’s stellar acting and convincing character portrayal. All three movies have over seven ratings on IMDb. Over time, as I watched his other works like ‘Hit’, ‘Citylights’, ‘Roohi’, ‘Mr and Mrs Mahi’, and ‘Badhaai Do’, I started associating him with someone who only does selective but good work and shines in all his roles.

But Rao, in the last few years, has been doing the same kind of roles back-to-back and it’s getting a little annoying now. I understand that most actors are typecast into a specific kind of role. But Rao is doing himself a disservice by playing a useless, lovestruck, small-town guy who has nothing going for him. He doesn’t come across as charming and irresistible as he’s supposed to. Rather, you pity him and sometimes even want to slap him.

His latest movie ‘Bhool Chuk Maaf’ that released this year is another disaster. The movie is available on Amazon Prime but I insist you give it a miss if you don’t want to suffer a headache. I attribute my headache after watching the movie to the countless times I must have rolled my eyes at Rao’s weird antics and painful acting. It takes a lot of effort to make a movie and I don’t want to say bad things but Bhool Chuk Maaf was a rehash of many different rom-coms we have all watched (and become a little bored of by now).

Ranjan Tiwari (Rao) is a small-town boy from Banaras, India, who is in love with Titli (Wamiqa Gabbi) but Titli’s father doesn’t approve of Ranjan. As someone who doesn’t have a stable job, he thinks Ranjan won’t be able to provide for his family. He agrees to let Titli marry Ranjan on one condition—that he find himself a government job in two months. Unable to get through multiple exams, Ranjan turns to Lord Shiva. Ranjan lands a job but gets stuck in a time loop when he forgets to fulfill his vow.

The plot has potential. It was marketed as a ‘high concept’ comedy. While I have read books where characters have been stuck in time loops, I hadn’t come across a Bollywood movie that explores this entertaining albeit frustrating concept. Had it been better executed and supported by strong acting by the main character, the movie wouldn’t have been such a bore. Gabbi shines in her role as does Sanjay Mishra who plays Bhagwan Das, the agent commissioned to find Ranjan a job. But Rao is at the center of the story and even with great support from the rest of the cast, he isn’t able to keep you hooked.

You feel like you have seen this movie before because you have watched Rao in similar roles in quite a few movies in the past. His role in Bhool Chuk Maaf is reminiscent of his roles in Stree, ‘Vicky Vidya ka Woh Wala Video’, ‘Chalaang’, Mr and Mrs Mahi and a few others that I’m forgetting at the moment. In each of these movies, he’s been reduced to a hapless person who can’t seem to fix his life. He’s a man child who always seems to get girls way out of his league. At least in the movies I have mentioned, his acting was convincing. In Bhool Chuk Maaf, Rao looks bored and disinterested.

The songs are ridiculous to say the least and Rao, who I thought was a decent dancer, makes jerky body movements and strange facial expressions. It was actually difficult to watch. Worse, the tracks also don’t fit seamlessly into the plot and just make the movie drag on pointlessly. I don’t remember the last time I watched a Bollywood flick and didn’t enjoy the choreography. But Bhool Chuk Maaf’s main fault definitely lies in its unconvincing characterization. It’s almost like Rao stepped into this movie from one of his previous movies and just found a new love interest. I hope Rao  chooses better scripts and steps away from rom-coms that make him seem like a loser and finally lives up to the potential he showed during his early days in the Hindi film industry. 

Yuddha Yuddha Nai Huncha

Ubaraj Adhikari

Published: June 2025

Publisher: Indigo Ink

Pages: 86, Paperback

‘Yuddha Yuddha Nai Huncha’ (A War is a War), an anthology of 33 poetry by Ubaraj Adhikari, reflects on the social, political, and personal struggles faced by individuals in Nepal, capturing a wide array of emotions and philosophical depth. There is a keen observation of various societal issues as well as a powerful resilience of the human spirit of commoners who have been obliged to live in harsh times and circumstances.

In doing so, Adhikari explores the themes of rebellion, nationality, love, compassion, and hope ultimately advocating universal humanism. Similarly, critique of corruption, valorization of resilience, and struggle for dignity are some of the essential features of his poetry.  

Some of his poems including ‘Prithivi ko Sankalpa’ (Resolution of the Earth) portray the powerful rebellion against oppression. The poet asserts that change is possible by the effort of a single brave soul and one person is enough to shatter ignorance and tyranny. ‘One storm is enough,’ he says, and ‘the resolution of the earth is enough.’  Here, the storm and earth are personified. Through these natural images, the author is appealing for resistance against those in power. The title of the collection, Yuddha Yuddha Nai Huncha, reflects his in-depth understanding of conflict, not merely in physical terms but also in regards to mental and emotional realms. For Adhikari, war is an inevitable response to oppression, and war is not just fought with weapons, but also with the rebellion of the heart and mind.

In the anthology, Adhikari has dealt with different themes. For example, the poems including ‘Aama’  (Mother), ‘Janmaghar’ (Birthplace) and ‘Mero Priya Fuchche’ (My Dear Fuchche) bring a more personal and intimate tone to the author. Adhikari celebrates the maternal figures as the center of a family, ethos, and civilization. He has confessed his deep compassion, feelings, and attachment to his mother, birthplace, and pet ‘Fuchche’ and shown that universal humanism is at the center of his poems.

Adhikari is a keen observer of political and social consequences. His poem ‘Jindabaad ra Murdabaad ko Saharma Kohi Aaune Chha’ (Someone Will Come to this City of Nasty Slogans) depicts a dark picture of societal collapse where disease, starvation, and nasty political slogans take over human life. Adhikari critiques the inhumanity of modern society by highlighting the suffering of working-class people. Here, we see that the people are suffering but politicians are involved in hollow rhetorics. While depicting the suffering of common people, Adhikari isn’t pessimistic which gives the readers a sense of hope. The references to brave people like Veer Balabhadra Kuwar and Bhakti Thapa and phrases like ‘someone will come with the light of the dawn’ mark that there is a possibility of hope and resistance even in this critical circumstance. 

Similarly, some of the poems including ‘Manchhe ra Satya’ (The Man and the Truth) and ‘Jiunda Manchheharu’ (Alive People) are based on the themes of heroism and individual roles in the transformation of society and nation. However, this individuality, for Adhikari, is always connected to patriarchal feelings and nationality. He advocates that the bravery of a citizen should be harnessed for the sake of the nation. In poems such as ‘Desh’ (Nation) and ‘Aama ko Aanshu’  (A Mother’s Tear,) Adhikari strongly raises the theme of nationalism. For him, our nation has been built due to the sacrifices of our ancestors. 

The poetry collection is an amazing one and I believe it must reach more readers. Adhikari has written beautifully, highlighting the different issues of contemporary life. In Yuddha Yuddha Nai Huncha, Adhikari not only advocates for a massive socio-political transformation with ultimate social justice but also equally appeals to the readers to be aware of nationalism and identity.
 

The fiscal year 2024–25 marked a cautiously optimistic phase in Nepal’s post-pandemic economic recovery. With a projected GDP growth of 4.61 percent, a narrowed fiscal deficit and record foreign exchange reserves, Nepal demonstrated notable resilience. However, beneath these surface indicators lies a complex interplay of structural weaknesses, external dependencies and opportunities that deserve closer scrutiny.

What it really means

At first glance, Nepal’s GDP growth of 4.61 percent appears moderate and consistent with a recovering economy. But this figure, while respectable, remains below the 7–8 percent growth rate necessary for rapid poverty reduction and meaningful job creation. The marginal increase in growth from the previous year’s 3.9 percent suggests a slow recovery rather than robust expansion.

More importantly, much of this growth was consumption-led and driven by remittance inflows, rather than investment-led industrial or export expansion. This signals a structural concern: Nepal’s economy continues to lean heavily on external income rather than internal productivity.

Services dominate, industries lag

The composition of GDP reflects deep-rooted imbalances. The services sector contributed over 62 percent to GDP, dwarfing agriculture (25.2 percent) and industry (12.8 percent). While services growth—particularly in transport, storage, and financial activities—is encouraging, it raises questions about sustainability. Services, especially low-productivity informal ones, often expand when there is a lack of industrial dynamism.

The industrial sector, despite moderate growth in construction and manufacturing, remains constrained by infrastructural bottlenecks, power reliability issues and limited domestic and foreign investment. Agriculture, although vital for employment, continues to suffer from low productivity, climate vulnerability and lack of commercialization.

A silver lining?

Headline inflation was 4.72 percent, down from previous years. This reflects effective monetary tightening and better supply chain management. However, food inflation persisted around 3.3 percent, affecting poor households disproportionately.

More analytically, the disinflationary trend owes much to suppressed demand and import-based consumption rather than domestic supply resilience. In a context where inflation in neighboring India remains high, Nepal’s price stability is fragile due to the currency peg and trade dependence. Any external price shock—especially in fuel or food—could reverse the gains swiftly.

Strength built on vulnerability

Remittances grew by 9.4 percent, reaching over Rs 1trn. On the surface, this is a strong signal of income support for households and foreign exchange stability. However, the economy’s growing reliance on labor exports (over 25 percent of GDP) reflects domestic weaknesses in job creation. Migration is not a sign of strength—it is often a symptom of failure to absorb labor at home.

The surge in exports (up 57 percent) is driven by a few commodities like edible oil re-exports and textiles, making it highly sensitive to global demand and bilateral trade policies. The trade deficit remains wide, and Nepal continues to import high-value goods while exporting low-value products—an unsustainable model.

The record-high foreign exchange reserves (covering over 14 months of imports) are welcome but largely attributable to remittances and restrained import demand rather than export competitiveness.

Improved discipline, but at what cost?

Nepal’s fiscal deficit declined sharply—from Rs 70bn to around Rs 16bn in the first eight months—thanks to higher revenue growth and restrained spending. While this reflects improved fiscal discipline, a closer look reveals underperformance in capital expenditure. Many development projects remained delayed or underfunded due to bureaucratic inefficiency, procurement issues and political instability.

Moreover, public debt is at 43.8 percent of GDP—moderate by international standards—but its composition is shifting toward more domestic borrowing, raising concerns over future interest liabilities and crowding out of private investment.

Loosening sans uptake

The Nepal Rastra Bank lowered policy rates to inject liquidity into the economy, leading to historic lows in lending rates. Yet credit uptake remained sluggish, indicating low investor confidence and weak private sector appetite for expansion. The rise in non-performing loans to 4.9 percent underscores emerging stress in the banking system, which could worsen if economic recovery remains tepid.

This disconnect between monetary easing and private sector response suggests deeper structural barriers—legal hurdles, creditworthiness concerns and weak project pipelines.

Climate shocks and structural risks

Nepal’s economic resilience was tested by major floods in mid-2024, causing damage equivalent to 0.8 percent of GDP. This highlights the increasing economic cost of climate change, especially for a country with fragile topography and inadequate disaster preparedness. Yet, climate adaptation and green investment remain minimal in budget allocations.

Additionally, long-term risks—including heavy remittance dependence, trade imbalances, political instability and underemployment—remain unaddressed. These challenges, if not structurally tackled, could stall Nepal’s path to middle-income status.

Conclusion: Resilient, yet restricted

Nepal's economic performance in 2024–25 reflected stability without transformation. The country avoided crisis and managed moderate growth, but it did not make the leap toward a more productive, inclusive or diversified economy. The gains were largely reactive rather than strategic—buoyed by remittances, import compression and fiscal restraint rather than innovation or competitiveness.

To transition from recovery to take-off, Nepal must move beyond short-term fixes. Reforms in public administration, industrial policy, export diversification, education and climate resilience are essential. Without them, the economy risks settling into a low-growth equilibrium marked by dependence, inequality and untapped potential.

At this time of a fiscal year, Nepal witnesses a kind of development frenzy hardly seen at other times. Earth-movers operate longer than usual and youths from different political parties and their myriad sister organizations sweat it out even in the rains, building motorable roads, canals, rural roads and what not with a sense of urgency and commitment that’s rarely seen in the life of this laid-back nation.

One wonders as to how long will it actually take for this country to take giant leaps on the path of (sustainable?) development if our energetic actors were to dedicate themselves to the cause of national development—and not individual development marked by ever-swelling bank accounts and personal as well as family fortunes, notable changes in what used to be a modest lifestyle, etc—like this round the year.
Those familiar with the ‘developments’ in Nepal know well that the development frenzy mentioned above lays bare an ugly face of development—that of a rigged development at play.

More often than not, the idea behind the frenzied work is to gobble up budget allocated for development/maintenance of infrastructure like roads, canals toward the fag end of a fiscal year when rains, floods and landslides wreak havoc throughout the country, making it clear that the hurried works won’t last long.There is every reason to suspect a food chain at work with monies small and big going to every actor involved in such projects based on their prominence. 

That the state agencies tasked with cleansing the system by launching a crackdown on such practices have hardly done so should be a matter of serious concern, especially for the taxpayer.

While irregularities in development works are a matter of serious concern, equally concerning is a very limited capacity of our state apparatuses to spend the budget earmarked for development. 

Data speak for themselves.
The government has not been able to spend even half of the development budget allocated for the fiscal year 2024-25, which comes to a close in mid-July. Of the Rs 3.52trn allotted for development works, the government has managed to spend a paltry Rs 1.64trn (46.59 percent) as of July 2 and one needs no expert to speculate about the quality of work conducted with the taxpayer’s hard-earned money. 

What’s more, the worrisome trend over the years is that an increasing share of the budget is going toward meeting administrative expenses like pay and perks for government employees, and repayment of foreign loans, at the expense of development. 

One more thing: Over the years in Nepal, development has become synonymous with road construction and maintenance, often undermining the fact that development brings destruction and displacement also.  

This calls for an increased focus on sustainable development, a serious and continuous development audit, and stringent action against big and small fish involved in corrupt ‘development practices’. 

Time to steer Nepal in that direction has indeed come.