Submit your Article

Nepal and China are set to resume their joint military drill, which had been stalled since 2019 due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The fourth edition of the drill will be held in China later this month. According to sources at the Nepali Army headquarters, the exercise will begin on Sept 21 and last for 10 days. Although China had been hesitant to restart the drill in the early years following the pandemic due to strict health restrictions, it has now agreed to move forward.

Outgoing Army chief Prabhu Ram Sharma played a key role in reviving the joint drill between the Nepal Army and China’s People’s Liberation Army, according to officials. Army spokesperson Brig Gen Gaurav Kumar KC confirmed that discussions are ongoing to finalize the details, although he did not provide further specifics. 

Sharma has reportedly proposed to the Chinese side that the dates for the exercise be confirmed before his retirement. Sharma officially retired on Monday, passing the leadership of the Nepali Army to Ashok Raj Sigdel. In preparation for the exercise, Sharma had earlier dispatched senior official Prem Dhoj Adhikari to Beijing for discussions. The final dates were set shortly after Adhikari’s return.

The drill, known as the Sagarmatha Friendship exercise, first began in 2017, drawing attention from both New Delhi and Beijing. This year’s edition will take place in Chengdu, China. Prior to 2017, while Nepal and China had engaged in training and exchanges, no joint military drills had been held between the two countries.

India, the US, and other nations have expressed concerns about the growing military cooperation between Nepal and China, viewing it through the lens of rising geopolitical tensions. Recently, China has introduced new global initiatives in both the development and security sectors, such as the Global Security Initiative (GSI), which has raised further apprehension in India and Western nations. Nepal, however, has informed China that it cannot be part of the GSI.

The Nepali Army maintains that these joint drills are routine, similar to the military exercises it conducts with other nations, including India and the US. For example, Nepal and India hold the Surya Kiran military drill annually, rotating the location between the two countries.

A special team from the Nepal Army, including an observer group led by senior official Pradeep Jung KC, will visit China to participate in the drill, which will focus on counterterrorism and disaster management. Each country will send a delegation of 18 members. The previous three editions of the drill were held in 2017, 2018, and 2019.

After a long wait, both the border points with Tibet of China have been opened.

The Ruila border point in Chumanbri Rural Municipality-1 and Nguila border point in Chumanbri Rural Municipality-7 of Gorkha have been opened, rural municipality Chairman Nima Lama informed.

Ruila border crossing has been open for 15 days and Nguila crossing for a month, Lama said.

The border points, closed by the Chinese side, were opened for a short time after five years.

Locals have been elated after the opening of the border crossings.

“Our border points have been opened. Now, the people can go to the Tibetan markets to buy daily essentials,” Chetan Chumbel Lama of Chumanbri-7 said, adding,” We have been asked to bring citizenship and pass. Now, the villagers are preparing to go to Shyak of Tibet.”

Though the border points are open, people are allowed to take only horses, not yaks, to transport goods.

Nguila border points were opened from Tuesday and Ruila from Wednesday.

During a meeting between the representatives of Chekampar and Tibetan officials, an understanding was reached that the border points will be opened from May.

The Chinese side had closed all 14 border points including Nguila border in Chumanbri-7 and Ruila border in Chumanbri-1 after the Covid-19 pandemic.

Dear Readers,

This week has seen significant developments on both the domestic and international fronts that deserve your attention. 

Nepal and China hosted a foreign-secretary level meeting in Kathmandu to discuss bilateral issues. Although no major breakthroughs were achieved, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong’s visit marked a significant diplomatic engagement. During his stay, he met with Nepal’s top leaders, including President Ram Chandra Paudel.

There were speculations that Nepal and China might sign a Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) implementation plan during this visit. However, this did not materialize. It is possible that progress could be made during Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s visit to Nepal, which is expected to take place very soon. China was keen on finalizing the agreement during Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal’s visit to Nepal last year. But Dahal was not interested.

Speaking in the Parliament, Prime Minister Dahal outlined Nepal’s position on BRI, which almost all major parties agree with. He said Nepal prefers grants over loans and, if loans are necessary, they should be concessional with interest rates not exceeding 1.5 percent. He also stated that Nepal seeks loans from China on terms similar to those from the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. This sentiment mirrors the position of former Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba during his discussion with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in 2022. To date, CPN-UML Chairperson and Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli has not publicly detailed his views on the BRI.

We have an in-depth analysis of Prime Minister Dahal’s parliamentary address under the heading ‘PM Faces Tough Questions in Parliament’. For more details, please visit our website.  A delegation led by CPN-UML leader Bishnu Rimal visited Beijing this week—latest in the series of Nepali leaders visiting China. China’s influence in Kathmandu has increased considerably in recent times. Our feature titled ‘China’s Growing Clout in Kathmandu’ explores how China’s engagement with Nepal extends beyond the BRI.

During his parliamentary session, Prime Minister Dahal also addressed questions about issues related to India and the Russia-Ukraine war, among other topics. Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Affairs Minister Narayan Kaji Shrestha attended the Asia Cooperation Dialogue in Iran, where he reaffirmed Nepal’s strong commitment to regional cooperation and multilateralism, a core foreign policy priority since the Panchayat era.

Last week, Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina paid an official visit to India, although she had been to New Delhi a few days ago to attend Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s inauguration. Along with bilateral discussions, the two leaders addressed sub-regional and regional issues, including power trade between Nepal, India and Bangladesh. Our detailed coverage of these topics is available online under the headline ‘A Landmark in Sub-Regional Energy Cooperation’. 

After the foreign secretary-level meeting with China, Nepal is now preparing for a similar foreign-secretary-level meeting with India. These annual meetings review the full spectrum of bilateral relations.

On the domestic front, political dynamics continue to be a topic of discussion. Speculation about the stability of the current government persists, with reports indicating ongoing talks between the Nepali Congress (NC) and the UML to explore potential new government formations. Our sister publication, Annapurna Post, recently published pieces advocating for the formation of a national consensus government.

Former President Bidya Devi Bhandari returned to the political spotlight amid rumors of her renewing her UML membership. However, in a recent interview, Bhandari clarified that she has not applied for membership and that the UML has not approached her. We have analyzed this development under the heading ‘Is Bhandari Planning a Return to UML?’, concluding that while her return to active politics is possible, it is not imminent.

The government has recommended ambassadors for eight countries, with the UML selecting former bureaucrats for its quota.

Meanwhile, the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) remains in the political limelight. Its General Secretary Mukul Dhakal has come up with a report describing the party as being in ‘serious illness’ and in need of a ‘major surgery’ to maintain its status as a national party. This report, which is said to be based on feedback from over 3,000 cadres across 38 districts, has given rise to significant debate within the party. Dhakal, a vocal critic of the current government and an adversary of RSP President Rabi Lamichhane, insists that RSP ministers must justify their stay in the government. There is a section in the RSP which believes the lust for power could affect its very base.

A parliamentary panel investigating the financial status of around 29 cooperatives has expedited its work. Media reports suggest that the panel is preparing to question Home Minister Rabi Lamichhane regarding his alleged involvement in the misappropriation of cooperative funds.

I will be back with more updates next week. Wishing you all a happy weekend!

The 16th meeting of Nepal-China Diplomatic Consultation Mechanism began in Kathmandu today.

Spokesperson at the Foreign Ministry, Amrit Bahadur Rai, shared that discussions are underway regarding overall areas of Nepal-China bilateral relations and cooperation in the meeting.

Similarly, discussions would be held on exchanging cooperation in different sectors including education, health, infrastructure, agriculture, trade, investment, tourism and financial support and connectivity in the meeting.

Foreign Secretary Sewa Lamsal on the behalf of Nepal is leading the delegation in the meeting which comprises senior officers of different ministries.

Likewise, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, Sun Weidong, is leading the Chinese delegation.

Weidong arrived in Kathmandu on Sunday morning for a three-day official visit to attend the meeting.

During his visit, the Vice Minister is scheduled to pay a courtesy call on President Ramchandra Paudel.

He paid a courtesy call on Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal on Monday. He is scheduled to return home tomorrow.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has seen mixed progress in Nepal since the two countries signed the agreement in 2017. A common narrative suggests that no significant projects have been completed under the BRI framework, leading many foreign policy observers to conclude that China has not succeeded in expanding its influence in Kathmandu, largely due to implicit pressure from the West and India. 

Nevertheless, the implementation of BRI remains a top agenda item in interactions between representatives of the Communist Party of China and Nepal’s political parties, especially the communist ones, which have expressed dissatisfaction over the perceived slow progress.

From the Chinese perspective, several soft and hard projects launched in Nepal fall under the broader BRI framework. However, China is pushing for the implementation of more infrastructure projects, as globally, the BRI is perceived mainly as an infrastructure initiative. 

Beyond BRI, China’s reach and influence in Nepal have significantly expanded across various sectors—from education to security, from village to national levels, and from electric vehicles to airline companies. Recent interactions even include the judiciary and parliament, with notable exchanges of visits between officials from both countries.

In November last year, Nepal’s Chief Justice Bishowambhar Prasad Shrestha visited China, followed by a reciprocal visit this week by Liu Guixian, a senior justice of the Supreme People’s Court of China. Senior leaders from Nepal’s National Assembly and the Speaker of the House of Representatives have also visited China in recent years.

Recent examples of China-Nepal cooperation include Chinese Ambassador to Nepal Chen Song’s participation in multiple events. These events illustrate China’s diverse offerings to Nepal, such as organizing the first intra-party school Chinese pop dance competition involving students from 13 primary and secondary schools, and a cardiovascular screening program by specialists from Fuwai Yunnan Hospital, which provided screenings for 4,682 Nepali children diagnosed with congenital cardiovascular disease, offering them free treatment in China.

Additionally, China has resumed the China Higher Level Education Fair, halted for two decades, and Nepal’s colleges and universities are increasingly offering Chinese language courses. The number of scholarships for Nepali students to study in China has also increased, as has the participation of Nepali bureaucrats going to China for education. Beyond education and health, China is also interested in importing Nepali tea, and the two countries are working on petroleum product collaborations. These are just some instances where there is a long list of new areas of collaboration between the two countries. 

For a long time, Western and European countries have been expanding their influence in Nepal through non-governmental organizations. Now Chinese non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are also becoming more active in Nepal. The China Foundation for Rural Development (CFRD), for instance, has been working in the areas of health, education, and other social issues, particularly in the Tarai region. Recently, CFRD provided aid to fire-affected people in the Mahottari district but this is not the first time. CFRD has been providing support in Madhes region since 2015 and it continues to expand. 

China has developed networks and projects to engage with all segments of Nepali society, and Ambassador Song has been instrumental in enhancing bilateral engagement through active social media presence and interactions with media personnel.

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs Narayan Kaji Shrestha has been a strong supporter of bilateral projects, frequently attending events organized by the Chinese Embassy and other Chinese-funded local organizations. Shrestha is notably the only minister in the Pushpa Kamal Dahal-led government, who has been consistently pushing for the signing of the BRI implementation plan, which remains pending.

As China aspires to engage more with Nepal, bilateral visits are expanding, with politicians from various levels visiting China. But it is noteworthy that visits by leaders from the Nepali Congress (NC) are fewer compared to those from communist parties. This could be due to fewer invitations from China or a lack of interest from senior NC leaders. Despite this, both Chinese and NC leaders acknowledge the historical role of bilateral relations, often referencing BP Koirala’s contributions from the 1960s.In summary, while progress on the BRI in Nepal may have been slow, overall Chinese engagement in the country has picked up speed, balancing hard and soft power. The Nepal-China border, which had been largely closed since 2015 and further impacted by Covid-19, has recently reopened, facilitating increased movement of people and goods. This week, the two countries are holding their 16th Secretary-level meeting to review the entire bilateral relationship. To measure China's influence in Nepal solely through the BRI lens is to overlook the broader picture. 

A high-level Chinese government delegation is visiting Nepal at the invitation of the Ministry of Home Affairs. The five-member team under Ye Hanbing, Vice-governor of Sichuan Province and Commissioner of the Public Security Department of the province, is arriving in Nepal on Tuesday morning. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Home Affairs are coordinating the visit.

According to sources, Hanbing’s team will meet with the Foreign Minister, Home Minister, Home Secretary, and other high-ranking officials. Home ministry sources indicate that discussions on matters of mutual and security interest will take place during the meeting. The visiting team includes Deng Hua, Zheng Xiaoqing, Zhong Ke, and Thang Jianxin. 

Of late, there has been a surge in high-level visits from China.

Immediately following Hanbing’s visit, a delegation under Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong will arrive in Nepal. According to the foreign ministry, Sun's team will participate in the 16th round of the Nepal-China Diplomatic Consultation Mechanism meeting. The foreign ministry of Foreign Affairs is making preparations for this visit.

Recently, China has intensified its activities in Pokhara and Lumbini, in addition to Kathmandu. For the Chinese New Year, the Chinese Embassy in Nepal organized various programs in Pokhara and Lumbini. Just last week, a high-ranking Chinese official visited Lumbini and Kathmandu. Chen Ruifeng, Chinese Minister for the National Religious and Cultural Affairs Administration, visited Lumbini last Wednesday, accompanied by Chinese Ambassador to Nepal Chen Song, Huang Zhihui, director-general of the General Bureau of National Religious Affairs Administration, and Venerable Master Yin Shun, a member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference and Vice-chairman of the Buddhist Association of China.

Minister Chen laid the foundation stone for a structure to be built next to the Chinese monastery in Lumbini. Participants in the foundation-laying ceremony included Yin Shun, Ambassador Song, Lumbini Development Trust (LDT) Vice-chairperson Lhyarkal Lama, Registrar of Lumbini Buddhist University Tilakram Acharya, and Deputy Mayor of Lumbini Sanskritik Municipality Kalpana Harijan.

Minister Chen also visited the office of Vice-chair Lama at the LDT. He stated that his visit aimed to promote tourism in Lumbini and sustain cultural relations between Nepal and China. Minister Chen toured the Maya Devi Temple, Ashoka Pillar, Pushkarani Pond, and Shanti Deep to gather information about Lumbini.

Also, Vice-chair of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), Bateer, paid a courtesy call on Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal on Sunday. During the meeting, they discussed bilateral relations, mutual cooperation, and the implementation of various agreements between the two countries. Prime Minister Dahal expressed satisfaction over the gradual implementation of the agreements reached during his recent visit to China. He thanked the Chinese government for operationalizing the traditional 14 checkpoints along the Nepal-China border and for gradually implementing important agreements.

The Armed Police Force established a Border Out Post at Samdo in Chumanubri of Gorkha district bordering China on Sunday.

With this, the number of BOPs established towards China has reached 10.

The BOP, established under APF company No. 29 of Gorkha, is 164 km north from Gorkha Bazaar, the district headquarters.

The BOP established in Nepal and China border will rescue people trapped in snowfall and avalanches, curb illegal smuggling, deal with criminal activities in the border areas and monitor border pillars and areas.

Ruyela border crossing is around 15 km from the BOP established at the elevation of 3, 875 meters from sea level.

Earlier, the APF had established BOP in nine places towards Chinese side including Tinkar of Darchula, Hilsa of Humla, Nechung of Mustang, Timure of Rasuwa, Tatopani and Gumba of Sindhupalchowk, Lamabagar of Dolakha, Kimathanka of Rasuwa and Olangchung Gola of Taplejung.

So far, Nepal has established 244 BOPs towards the Indian border and 10 towards Chinese border.

In 2018, a visit by then China’s Ambassador Yu Hong to Janakpur, the capital of Madhes Province, raised eyebrows. Usually, ambassadors travel for events or for a holiday, but this visit felt different. Unlike typical ambassadorial trips, Yu’s focused on distributing disaster relief under China Aid. This sparked curiosity about China’s growing interest in Nepal’s Tarai region, which traditionally has closer ties with India due to open borders and constant movement of people and goods. Hong’s visit to Janakpur was a sign that China was changing its approach.

More recently in May, current Chinese Ambassador to Nepal Chen Song visited Madhes again.  He attended the launch of a new program in Barahathawa Municipality called ‘Support for schools and communities in remote areas for Pandemic Prevention and Green Recovery’.  This China Aid initiative, partnered with the UNDP, will benefit 15,000 students and 7,500 families in Sarlahi and Rautahat districts.

China has initiated support to schools and communities in Madhes Province of Nepal, which is quite rare. This move was hugely welcomed by the local communities, which was witnessed in the way the Chinese team was greeted in the area. During his visit, Ambassador Song also announced two major projects of clean drinking water and solar light in the villages starting right from Madhes Province. 

From the provincial government representatives to local government heads, there was a unified voice that China’s support could be instrumental. Provincial Minister for Physical Infrastructures and Development Saroj Kumar Yadav thanked China for selecting Madhes Province and establishing new model projects, while Barahathawa Mayor Kalpana Kumari Katuwal said that the support could bring positive changes in the lives of the general public. 

The ambassador and his team received similar welcoming gestures from the school and community representatives. Some even suggested opening Chinese language centers or establishing sister-city relations among Tarai towns and Chinese cities.

This wasn’t China’s first project in Madhes though. In 2018, China Aid supported 31,800 flood-affected families in seven Tarai districts, including Sarlahi, Dhanusha, Mahottari, Rautahat, and Parsa, through the Post-Flood Recovery Program. Similarly, a Chinese NGO helped establish over 100 wash stations and isolation centers during the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Though the Tarai has no language or cultural symmetry with China as it has with India, it is noteworthy that many students from the region have been studying in Chinese universities under various scholarship programs. These scholarship programs, along with development and disaster relief programs, highlight China's growing interest in the region.

Asked whether there is a gap between China and Madhes, Ambassador Song denied there was one. He said China is willing to support Madhes just like any other provinces of Nepal. According to him, China sees potential in agriculture and industry, offering support in health and education. 

“I think Madhes Province is very promising in these two areas. It needs more help, development and cooperation. That’s my impression,” he said.

His visit to schools suggests a shift towards public diplomacy, building connections with the people of Tarai. 

There are already signs of Chinese economic interest in the region too. Chinese companies have set up small-scale industries in Bara. The Chinese ambassador and his team visited a construction site under the Package 5 of the Kathmandu-Tarai/Madhes Fast Track, which is assigned to CMCE/SDLQ JV, China, and thanked the contractors for the substantial progress. 

These latest developments, along with Song’s positive remarks on Madhes’ potential, indicate a more active Chinese role in the future.

It is clear that China is no longer content with its traditional approach to diplomacy, that it is gradually coming out from the G2G diplomatic engagements and trying to put people-to-people relationship at the center of its diplomacy. 

While Nepal strives to maintain neutrality in its relations with India and China, Madhes Province can benefit from development assistance offered by both neighbors. China’s cautious and pragmatic approach seems to be winning hearts, and the future holds promise for deeper cooperation between China and Madhes.

The author is a freelance journalist

China Aid has joined hands with United Nations Development Program (UNDP) to support schools and communities in Madhesh Province of Nepal.

As part of the assistance, a special project to “Support for schools and communities in remote areas for Pandemic Prevention and Green Recovery” was unveiled in Barahathawa Municipality in Sarlahi district on Thursday.

The project will support 25 government schools in Sarlahi and Rautahat districts, benefiting 15,000 students, and 7500 families.

Addressing the function, Provincial Minister for Physical Infrastructures and Development Saroj Kumar Yadav expressed gratitude for selecting Madhesh Province and establishing new model projects in the region.

Stating that mega development projects are being developed in China, Yadav said that it could have a huge significance for Nepal’s development and prosperity.

On the occasion, Chinese Ambassador to Nepal Chen Song remarked that the project would create safe and healthy learning environment for students and communities against extreme weather events, disasters and extreme shocks.

“In 2022, the Ministerial Meeting of the Group of Friends of the Global Development Initiative released the first batch of 50 projects of GDI projects pool, in which this project was included,” Song said, adding that the projects of GDI have been creating huge contributions to Nepal and the world.

He also announced two major projects including ‘clean drinking water’ and ‘lightening the villages’ starting from Madhesh Province.

In response, Mayor of Barahathawa Municipality Kalpana Kumari Katuwal remarked that the support would be highly beneficial for the local communities.

"I believe this is a new beginning, and together with the partners, we can bring bright changes in the lives of general public, mostly to poor and backward communities.”

Jullien Chevillard, UNDP Nepal’s Deputy Resident Representative, stated that investment in education and green recovery is crucial to address the impacts of climate change, and to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

The latest project is implemented by China Foundation for Rural Development(CFRD), while was researched by World Education.

Wu Peng, Director of International Development Department of CFRD, informed that the organization has supported more than 60 districts across 7 Provinces, directly benefitting over a half million population.

“With joint partnerships, we want to help communities to be restored from pandemic and disasters, and help Nepali public have a better life,” Peng remarked.

Under the latest project, the schools will be provided with necessary equipments and goods like desks, tables and book racks to enhance learning environment, students with stationaries package, and communities with essential items like mats and improved stoves.

A neurosurgeon from the 15th batch of China’s medical aid team to Nepal is helping strengthen the diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities for brain tumor patients in Nepal. Dr Yang, who is affiliated with the Neurosurgery Department at the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, is not just a renowned medical professional but also a passionate ambassador of health and friendship between China and Nepal. 

Working closely with his counterpart, Dr Benju, at the BP Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital, Dr Yang Jiankai has helped redefine the neurosurgical medicine landscape in Nepal. His dedication to both his field of expertise and the larger cause of international cooperation is truly commendable. As a neurosurgeon, he possesses extensive knowledge and skills in treating a wide range of neurological conditions. His surgical expertise and clinical acumen have saved countless lives and improved the quality of life for many patients. 

The seasoned Chinese neurosurgeon’s stay in Nepal has been a testament to his dedication, not just to his medical expertise but to his understanding that elevating the standards of diagnosis and treatment for brain tumor patients necessitates not just technical exchanges but also cultural and ideological integrations. Through a multifaceted approach, he has empowered local medical professionals with advanced knowledge and skills.

He frequently invites neurosurgeons from China and organizes seminars where health professionals from the two countries hold discussions on the latest advancements in brain tumor diagnosis and treatment. Dr Yang’s hands-on guidance during surgical procedures and patient consultations has provided invaluable opportunities for Nepali doctors to witness and appreciate the Chinese neurosurgical techniques firsthand. His vision extends beyond the confines of the operating room. He has facilitated opportunities for Nepali doctors to visit health facilities in China, fostering stronger bonds of friendship and collaboration. 

In September last year, Dr Benju who was participating in intellectual exchanges in Shandong, China, expressed keen interest in observing neurosurgical procedures in Chinese hospitals. Recognizing this as a valuable opportunity to enhance Dr Benju’s understanding of Chinese medical technology, Dr Yang reached out to Principal Li Gang and Neurosurgery Director Ni Shilei of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. He arranged for Dr Benju to observe several neurosurgical surgeries. 

Commenting on the visit, Dr Benju said he was astounded by China’s rapid progress in neurosurgery. “Many of the neurosurgical procedures were entirely novel to me. I realized there is a vast array of neurosurgical techniques to master, and I sincerely hope for more opportunities to engage in exchanges and learning at Chinese hospitals,” he added. Moreover, Dr Yang has also been leading joint scientific research endeavors on neurosurgery between China and Nepal.  

Through his multidimensional approach, Dr Yang has not only enhanced the diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities of Nepalese doctors in treating brain tumor patients but has also enriched himself with invaluable experiences and insights from his Nepali counterparts. Dr Yang’s vision is even broader. He believes that health is a shared concern of all nations, and cooperation in this field can greatly strengthen the bonds of friendship and mutual understanding between countries. With this belief, he has made significant contributions to promoting health cooperation between China and Nepal. 

He has participated in numerous medical missions and exchange programs with Nepal, sharing his expertise and learning from his Nepalese colleagues. He has also advocated for increased cooperation in areas such as training, research, and patient care, helping to bridge the gap in medical resources and capabilities between the two countries. His interactions with Nepali doctors, patients, and community members have not only strengthened his professional network but also deepened his understanding and appreciation of Nepalis culture and society.

Currently, we stand at the crossroads of shifting global alliances, new forms of global power competition, polarity among the traditional and emerging power centers, and the rise of multi-polar world order. The Indo-Pacific region is increasingly becoming the hotspot of the global power contest. South Asia, as one of the growing economic centers, with one-fourth of world population, and the unprecedented rise of China and India, has become the epicenter of global power rivalry.

In this broader geopolitical landscape, Nepal, situated between these two major rivals, is dragged into the power contest of its neighbors. Nepal should carefully navigate the interest of foreign powers and should be able to leverage its geo-political position to realize its agenda of prosperity. Although it is a challenging task, it provides us with ample opportunities.

Formulating proactive foreign policy and smart diplomatic dealing is essential to maximize our national interests. We are clear on isolating ourselves from any strategic, security or military alliances, but we welcome development partnerships that do not undermine our national interests. Now coming to the topic of today’s discussion, we see BRI as an opportunity to materialize our developmental goals, but there are specific issues of concern with the BRI.

China is a long-standing bilateral partner, and one of the countries with strong historic trade, commerce and people-to-people ties. We envision deepening ties with China on mutually beneficial terms. Nepal became a part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative in 2017.

The initial motivation for joining BRI was the prospect of trade and connectivity diversification. However, seven years after signing the MoU, there has been no significant progress on BRI. As the chairman of the International Relations and Tourism Committee of the parliament, I advocate partnerships with any countries to realize our investment needs, but the partnership should be transparent and it should not undermine our sovereignty and should be a win-win situation. With the growing pressure for the BRI implementation plan agreement, we should first have a comprehensive discussion on the provisions of the BRI MoU signed in 2017, which is not yet disclosed by both the governments. The MoU should be brought and discussed in the parliament. And then, we can move onward with the discussion on implementation modality of the projects under the BRI. For this there is a need for national consensus and wider discussion on the modality of partnership under BRI. We have a lot to learn from the global experience of the BRI.

We should be clear on the stance of the financial modality to fund the BRI projects. We cannot simply accept the commercial loans with high interest rates from China with shorter payback periods. Our negotiation with China should focus on grants and concessional loans with interest rates at par with other multilateral financial institutions and should not have any strings attached. The selection of projects under the BRI should be based on comprehensive feasibility study and cost benefit analysis. We should refrain from any projects without economic viability.

There are also concerns on procurement process, financial audit of the investments and construction modality of projects. The projects should be open for bidding to all interested companies globally, Nepal should have the right to conduct financial audits of the projects under BRI. Meanwhile, projects should also procure local resources, manpower and should be able to transfer technology to ensure sustainability of the projects. At the same time, we should consider the environmental and social sustainability of the projects. To ensure this, there should be wider consultations with the multiple stakeholders and detailed study to ensure projects are environmentally, socially viable and do not underestimate the rights of local ethnic communities. I am hopeful Nepal could benefit from the partnership under BRI if China is willing to accommodate our concerns and negotiate on mutually favorable terms. I also urge the Nepal government to clarify the current status of negotiation on BRI and developments in the process. 

The author is head of parliament’s international affairs committee

Nepali citizens visiting China will get a free entry permit (visa). Now, the Nepalis will not have to pay for the visa.

The Chinese Embassy informed that the entry permits for the Nepalis visiting China have been made free of cost. However, certain service charges will be levied.

According to the Chinese Embassy, this rule will come into effect from May 1.

The Nepali Embassy said that the free visa system has been implemented to further strengthen the relations between Nepal and China.

The Nepal government, however, has been providing 150 days free visa to the Chinese nationals.

The Chinese Embassy said that the visa fee will not be charged for single and multiple entry.

The Embassy further informed that no fee will be charged even for multiple entry permits of six months and one year.

The 17th Nepal-China (Tibet) Economic and Trade Fair is going to be held in Kathmandu on April 29.

The trade fair is held every two years in one another country as per the agreement reached between the government of Nepal and the commerce department of the Tibet Autonomous Region of China in 1990.

According to the Trade and Export Promotion Center, the main objective of the fair is to further expand the bilateral economic and trade relations between Nepal and China (Tibet).

Around 125 businesspersons including a five-member high-level delegation will participate in the fair.  The official delegation will be led by the Vice Chair of the Tibet Autonomous Region Government of China, Long Fukuan.

There will be 50 exhibition stalls on behalf of China (Tibet) in the fair, including herbs, agricultural products, modern agricultural tools, tea, electrical appliances, household appliances, carpets, beverages, handicrafts, incense, two-wheelers, three-wheelers, four-wheelers, electric vehicles and beauty products.

Likewise, there will be 15 exhibition stalls on behalf of Nepal, including herbs, coffee, tea, handicrafts/carpentry, metalwork, carpet, pashmina and other products.

The fair will be open from 10 am to 6 pm and entry is free.

Located between China and India, Nepal ranks 108th out of 180 countries in the Transparency International’s corruption perceptions index (CPI), a very unenviable position compared to neighbors like Bhutan (26th), the Maldives (93rd) and India (93rd). What offers us a little bit of solace is a relatively better position than other neighbors, namely Sri Lanka (115th), Pakistan (133rd), Bangladesh (149th) and Afghanistan (162nd).

In my reading, a lack of transparency and open-access data policy is mainly to blame for a poor showing vis-a-vis CPI on the part of Nepal, which in 2015 became a federal secular democratic republic, a political order that is supposed to have democracy, transparency, and access to information at its core. 

Access to information is vital for a smooth operation of this political order because it helps not only to improve public service delivery but also increases public trust in government bodies. 

That is why the Constitution of Nepal has upheld the right to information (RTI), with Article 27 of the Charter declaring RTI as a fundamental right of every citizen of Nepal. 

With the aim of guaranteeing RTI, the government introduced the Right to Information Act 2007, set up a National Information Commission (NIC) in 2008, regarded as a very important step in promoting transparency and corruption in Nepal, and introduced some supporting rules in 2009. Section 4 of the Act has provisioned respect for and protection of the citizens’ right to information through classification and updation of information and dissemination of the same to the public, envisioning citizens’ ‘simple and easy’ access to information. Whereas Section 5 has a provision “to keep the information updated for at least 20 years.” 

Per the Act, both government and non-government entities must update information every three months and disclose the information even when the public does not seek it. 

Despite the open open-access data policy, none of the governmental entities (including the ministries), barring a few exceptions, have duly followed the RTI Act and other relevant rules. 

It is common for government officials to cover up corruption and malfeasance by hiding crucial information, including details of public officials' property, revenue losses, tax evasion and reports on suspicious financial transactions. 

Most of the government entities have appointed an information officer each for dissemination of information of public importance. But most of them are not very cooperative when it comes to providing data and dilly-dallying is quite common among them. 

This tendency to deny RTI is mainly due to 1) a culture of secrecy within government bodies, 2) lax implementation of RTI Act and its rules, and 3) no strict punishment for offices and personnel tasked with categorizing data and publishing them. 

It gives rise to some important questions: Are these entities functioning as per relevant rules and regulations? If  the officers have performed their tasks accordingly, then why are they hesitating to share data with the public?  

Does this unwillingness to share data reflect the concerned personnel’s vested interests? 

Whatever the reason behind this, correction measures should be taken and data made available to the people. In the absence of an open-access data policy and data-sharing mechanisms, it is impossible to verify whether the concerned personnel are discharging their duties in accordance with relevant laws or not. 

Following interventions are necessary to ensure the public’s easy access to data in Nepal: 

• Strict implementation of RTI Act 2007 and its Rules 2009 
• Implementation of new concepts in governance such as New Public Services and New Public Governance
• Activities aimed at raising awareness among the public to seek data from both government and non-government entities 
• Promotion of the culture of information dissemination and transparency through disruption of the culture of secrecy 
• Comprehensive research on identifying the impediments to open-access data-sharing systems, ways to remove the hurdles and implement the identified correction measures 

 The author, a veterinary officer at the Department of Livestock Services, is a graduate of the University of Cambridge

Over the past few years, China has achieved political, economic and diplomatic feats. No apparent observation, perhaps, can emasculate China’s global march—it is rising so gracefully, smoothly and enormously. China is most likely to grow from being a superpower to a mega-power. But in the evolving international system, it is anticipated to play rational, responsible and equable roles.

The most sensible foreign policy course of action for Nepal at this point of unparalleled rise of its immediate neighbor would be to strategically align with it by building mutual trust, while maintaining a delicate balance with another neighbor. Nonetheless, Nepal ought to maintain a pragmatic economic and security framework through increased mutual trust, strategic partnerships and technological cooperation with both the neighbors. Nepal’s economic, developmental and security architecture, despite many geopolitical challenges, should be guided by a sensible geopolitical assessment and wider techno-economic cooperation with immediate neighbors and other powers.

Over the past few years, Nepal has found itself in the midst of a tug-of-war among three major global powers: India, China, and the US. Each of these countries are vying for influence in Nepal’s economic, military, ideological and technological spheres.

Let’s begin with the US. The Biden administration in the US has made advancing democracy one of its key global priorities. In South Asia, Nepal appears to be in the high priority of the US democracy projects. The US has been inviting Nepal’s prime minister to its annual democracy summit. Both communist and non-communist prime ministers have attended the summit. The US is making efforts to counterbalance the influence of the Chinese Communist Party in Nepal and uphold democratic values in the region. In the meantime, the US is equally concerned about the influence of India’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) which is pushing for the restoration of Hindu state in Nepal. A US document says: “The Nepali political class’s penchant for balancing relations with its large neighbors India and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) renders security cooperation, including with the United States, prone to political interference.” 

Despite claims that it does not export its communist ideology, China has been promoting its political model in other countries. Under the guise of showcasing its achievements, China has been exporting its ideology to South Asian countries. Chinese leaders are urging their Nepali counterparts, particularly those aligned with the communist ideology, to embrace the Chinese model. Every year, China invites a large number of Nepali communist leaders to its cities to showcase its development model. Of late, Nepali leaders have started saying that Nepal can replicate the same model which reflects a growing acceptance of the Chinese  model within the country.

Though India and the US are on similar pages on a range of issues, the two powers have divergent views about the democratic values in South Asia. India, on its part, is sending conflicting signals on the ideological front. While the Indian government seems committed to uphold democracy, secularism and inclusive constitution in Nepal, the ruling BJP harbors reservations about Nepal’s 2015 constitution, which, it perceives, is imbued with Western values. The BJP’s parent organization, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, is reaching out across the political parties and the general people with Hindu-centric agendas. The BJP believes it can reduce Western influence on Nepal, dismantle secularism and restore Hindus state through such activities. Such activities are already polarizing Nepal’s political fabric.

In addition to ideological battles, Nepal is grappling with strategic challenges posed by major powers. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its insistence on the One China policy dominate all its engagements with Nepal. Likewise, China’s Global Security Initiatives (GSI) and Global Civilizational Initiatives (GCI) and Global Development initiative (GDI) are getting more prominence over economic issues. Nepal has consistently expressed its commitment to One China policy for over 50 years now. Still, China does not seem convinced and seeks reaffirmation on One China policy every time.

A press statement issued after Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal's visit to China last September also reiterated Nepal's firm stance against Taiwan Independence. His new Foreign Minister Narayan Kaji Shrestha echoed the same sentiment during his visit to China last month. Although China keeps emphasizing on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in various meetings, tangible progress on infrastructure development under the BRI umbrella has not materialized yet. Government officials, politicians, and foreign policy analysts say that Nepal needs to capitalize on China's economic growth. However, this aspiration has yet to materialize due to the significant focus that both countries are placing on strategic concerns.

While Chinese investment in Nepal is on the rise and cooperation between the two nations has expanded in recent years, substantial investment projects that could catalyze economic growth remain elusive. Instead, Nepal’s attention is primarily directed towards ensuring that its territory is not used for anti-China activities. Regarding Chinese investment in Nepal, there have been occasional complaints from the Chinese side regarding obstacles faced by its investors.

Nepal engaged in a four-year debate on whether to accept the $500m support from the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) of the US government. The MCC projects are finally into implementation. However, the project is not gaining the desired pace. Many attribute the slow progress to the government’s lackluster commitment to these projects. This tepid response was partly influenced by China’s strong opposition to the projects which labeled it as part of the Indo-Pacific Strategy (IPS). Nepali politicians, bureaucrats and experts continue to struggle in comprehending the US policy towards Nepal in the context of the IPS. Following discussions on the IPS, attention in Nepal shifted on the State Partnership Program (SPP) of the US government.

Under domestic pressure, the government led by Sher Bahadur Deuba of the Nepali Congress wrote a letter to the US government stating that Nepal won’t be a part of the SPP. Of late, there has been a notable increase in interest from US investors looking to invest in Nepal. However, Nepal has yet to effectively address this interest despite a substantial increase in US assistance through USAID.

All this shows that Nepal has already fallen into the geopolitical trap. Nepal is not seeing much investments in priority sectors as major powers are prioritizing their security and strategic interests. Though Nepal is pushing for more economic collaborations, strategic issues are dominating the bilateral negotiations and public discourse. Nepal’s current key priorities are economic recovery, minimizing the impacts of climate change and creating jobs but due to the geopolitical tensions these issues are getting a backseat in the engagement with major powers.

Nepal has struggled to take a clear stance on initiatives like the IPS, BRI, and other strategic endeavors. While managing these challenges should be the top priority of the government, the country is marred by internal political instability. Geopolitics is gradually creating rifts within Nepali society. Nepal needs to make concerted efforts to mitigate internal divisions and chart a path forward that safeguards Nepal’s interests amidst global power struggles.