Submit your Article

Nepal and China have agreed to jointly inspect the border.

During a Nepal-China border affairs virtual meeting held on July 14, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Nepal and the desk which looks after the border of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China had agreed to inspect the border jointly.

Nepal and China have failed to conduct joint inspection of the border since 2011.

Because of this, the two countries have been facing problems at the border frequently.

Earlier, Nepal had to search for pillar number 11 in Humla district which was said to have been missing.

As the two countries have not carried out joint inspection of the border for a long time, Nepal had faced problems to determine the pillar.

The missing border pillar had created a dispute between the two countries, after reports that China built some infrastructure in the area.

Similarly, the border dispute has also been seen in Limi-based Lolungjong of Humla.

Likewise, the Chinese side has also been found putting up barbed fences in the northern part of Gorkha unilaterally.

Nepal had requested China for joint inspection after the disputes started to surface in the northern part of the country.

Sewal Lamsal, spokesperson at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the meeting has agreed to jointly inspect the border.

The meeting has also decided to open the Kerung and Tatopani border by adopting the Covid-19 safety protocols, Lamsal said.

She said that the meeting has decided to open the Hilsa border one way.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict is now six-month-old, with its economic and geopolitical impacts being felt near and far. Above all, countries the world over are having to grapple with ever-rising inflation. Nepal, whose own inflation rate is now inching close to double digits, is not immune to this global trend. The war has also brought about some changes in the country’s foreign policy and geopolitical conduct.

The government-run think tank Policy Research Institute (PRI) recently came up with a report on the war’s impact on Nepal. So what did it find?

Says Bishnu Raj Upreti, the PRI’s executive chair: “One less-noticed effect of the war is the increasing level of psychological threat small countries feel from their big neighbors.”

The lesson is that, adds Upreti, these countries need to be better prepared at navigating the choppy seas of geopolitics.

The war has also triggered a debate on the conduct of Nepal’s foreign policy. The country’s long-standing policy of non-alignment has come under scrutiny, as politicians and foreign policy watchers are divided over Nepal’s position on Ukraine. 

Some argue that Nepal has compromised on its policy of non-alignment and joined the American camp by voting in the United Nations Security Council against Russia’s aggression. 

Foreign policy expert Chandra Dev Bhatta says the current war has led to the emergence of new notions of non-alignment, which poses challenges, yet again, to the post-Second World War global order. 

“This situation has certainly forced many countries including Nepal to revisit their foreign policies,” he says. 

Nepal’s two neighbors, India and China, which remained neutral in the UN voting, are reportedly unhappy with Nepal’s position. 

Upreti says the principled position taken by the Nepal government was correct, but it should have avoided the UN voting considering the strategic interests and sensitivity of our neighbors. “It taught us that we should be more cautious in such issues in the coming days,” he adds.

Bhatta is of the view that the war will pose more and more problems for Nepal, “the longer it drags on.”

The PRI research report says Nepal’s UN position on the war has created suspicion that Nepal could deviate from its non-alignment policy.

“From a geopolitical standpoint, just like Ukraine, Nepal too is in a sensitive situation. In some aspects, we are more vulnerable than Ukraine,” the report says while suggesting that the government clarify its position with India and China to avoid misunderstandings. The continued goal of Nepal’s foreign policy, it advises, should be to protect Nepal’s sovereignty and serve the agenda of prosperity.

Prices of daily essentials including petroleum products have skyrocketed, hitting the poor sections of the society.

Nepal used to import cooking oil from Ukraine while it brought food items, mineral oil and industrial raw material from Russia. Russia’s assistance to Nepal, the PRI report predicts, is likely to go down in the coming days. 

The rise in commodity prices has forced central banks around the world to readjust their interest rates. 

And as the dollar is getting stronger, the Nepali currency is steadily losing its value. The PRI report says this kind of devaluation will further weigh on Nepal’s vulnerable economy.

The war’s continuity could also imperil Nepal’s food security. India has already barred the export of wheat (except to its small neighbors). 

Nepal’s agricultural output is low and food imports are rising. If India faces a food crisis, it could limit food export to Nepal as well. There is also the fear of fertilizer shortage. Nepal should take proactive steps to immediately address these issues, the PRI report suggests.

Upreti, for his part, says “we have to be prepared for the worst.” 

The PRI report says the Russia-Ukraine war could also affect Nepal’s share market. Over the past few months, Nepal’s stock market has been on a downward trend.

Another issue of concern is Nepal’s position on human rights. Raising the incidents of war crimes committed by Russian soldiers in Ukraine, Western countries may bring sanction proposals in the UN system. They will then try to get Nepal to vote in their favor.

Nepal should be prepared to handle such delicate situations, the report recommends. 

The report also suggests ways to mitigate the effects of the war and in dealing with foreign policy challenges. For one, Nepal should brief the international community about its position on the Russia-Ukraine war, stating that it is in line with Nepal’s non-alignment foreign policy. 

As Nepal is the current chair of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), Nepal should have taken the initiative to come up with a common South Asian position on the war. (The SAARC member states were divided during the UN voting on the Russia-Ukraine war.) 

The report suggests Nepal stockpiles petroleum products for at least three months while also taking measures to minimize consumption. 

As the war could impact the flow of remittance, it advises, the government should start diplomatic talks with labor-importing countries to find a common way forward. 

Sri Lankan lawmakers chose six-time Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe as president Wednesday to succeed the ousted leader who fled the country in a vote that risks reigniting political turmoil in the troubled South Asian island nation, Associated Press reported.

Former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa appointed Wickremesinghe as prime minister in May, hoping to bring stability to a country engulfed in its worst economic crisis in memory. Wickremesinghe became acting president after Rajapaksa fled the country last week and resigned by email.

Wickremesinghe, 73, is a seasoned politician with wide experience in diplomatic and international affairs. He has been leading crucial talks on an economic bailout package with the International Monetary Fund and was backed by members of the fragmented ruling coalition. But he is unpopular among voters who view him as a holdover from Rajapaksa’s government, according to Associated Press.

The vote of 134 lawmakers put Wickremesinghe ahead of former government minister Dullas Alahapperuma, who received 82 votes. 

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has clarified that Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba will visit the United States at an appropriate time.

The Ministry made it clear about the visit at a time when rumors have been making rounds that Prime Minister Deuba’s visit to the United States has been canceled.

Sewa Lamsal, spokesperson at the Ministry, said that the Prime Minister’s visit to the United States is being worked out at one level.

“The Prime Minister has been waiting for a favorable time to visit the United States. There is no truth about the cancellation of the visit,” she said.

The Ministry said that the reply about the cancellation of the State Partnership Program (SPP) will be sent to the United States only after the effective preparation.