Submit your Article

Chock-a-block traffic has pushed many countries to prioritize the development and operation of mass transit systems, but Nepal is an exception with the metropolis of Kathmandu offering a glaring example.

There’s a great scope for transit systems like underground train, monorail, the cable car and trolley bus/bus rapid transit (BRT) in Kathmandu as they can ease congestion to a great extent.

But developing and operating such a mass transit system in Kathmandu is easier said than done as several rounds of discussions conducted on the topic in the past have shown. 

First and foremost, developing such a system requires a long time and huge investment. The metro and rail systems are not the only alternative, though. Ropeway/cable car can also be used for urban transport at a lower cost compared to other modes of mass transit.  

In reality, BRT has a few fundamental differences compared to the existing system. BRT buses use the existing road facility, but such buses have a higher passenger carrying capacity, use a dedicated lane and have fewer stops. 

In many countries, the public sector operates BRT, which requires huge investments, with subsidies from the government to fulfill social obligations. However, there’s an absence of a public sector entity willing to shoulder this responsibility in Kathmandu, a city of almost 4m people, thanks to an influx of people from hilly and Tarai regions, who come here looking for jobs, for medical treatment and study opportunities. A large number of people move on motorcycles and scooters, while a huge number also shuttles through buses, cars, taxis, three-wheelers and on the recently-introduced BRT system along the Kathmandu-Suryavinayak stretch. 

While the operation of BRT is highly appreciable, it should have less stoppage and the buses in use should be a bit larger with more passengers carrying capacity. As such, 1.74m vehicles (including two-wheelers) in operation along the total road stretch of 247.7 km in and around Kathmandu do not appear to be sufficient to cater to an ever-increasing demand for mobility. 

Kathmandu witnesses massive congestions along its arteries during peak hours: 9-11 am and 5.00-6.30 pm. In the absence of a mass transit system, it is a daily struggle for commuters to report to duty on time and return home on time by getting onboard any means of transport available.  

Also, the availability of soft credit facilities for the purchase of vehicles and absence of long-term import restrictions mean a geometrical surge in the number of vehicles in the city, which only worsens congestion.

There’s no doubt that the existing public transport system does not offer a hassles-free bus/microbus ride to a multitude, especially during peak hours. Traffic Police deserve credit for introducing a relatively good traffic management system by designating stoppages at lay-byes and other suitable sites with necessary segregation.  

In addition, a queuing system in place for potential riders in Ratna Park and other crowded areas of Kathmandu where more than 1,700 buses arrive and depart for different destinations daily has a vital role to play in traffic management. 

Despite its effectiveness, this queuing system is yet to be replicated in several other locations. 

In some cases, the pickup system has been chaotic due to the absence of a specified bus terminal where the bus originates and terminates. 

At present, all buses around some of the important locations, in the absence of designated bus terminals, are starting or terminating their journeys from available lay-byes or other areas. 

In such a chaotic situation, Kathmandu Metropolis has designated Kathmandu Bus Park (terminal) at Gongabu as the origin and destination for all buses to and from Kathmandu. This is a commendable act as it has also helped ease congestion. 

The author is a former Executive Director, Nepal Intermodal Transport Development Board. He can be reached at [email protected]

The article is Part I of a two-part series

As a nation with various religions, cultures, ethnicities and languages, Nepal allows every Nepali to practice their religion and culture. This fundamental right is enshrined in our Constitution. 

Despite different religious texts and beliefs, our core values unify us—humanitarianism, peace and respect for diverse religions and cultures. From Nepal, the birthplace of Gautam Buddha, a global symbol of peace, we have spread the message of peace, tolerance, harmony and coexistence around the world. It is vital that we preserve this heritage. 

I earnestly ask all religious, cultural and ethnic groups to promote peace, tolerance and coexistence while staying vigilant against divisive actions that threaten national unity and our heritage. I urge the government to swiftly restore law and order by upholding religious, social and cultural unity, tolerance and coexistence. 

I request social media users to refrain from sharing content that could disrupt religious, social and cultural harmony, tolerance and coexistence. 

The author is a lawmaker and secretary general of Nepali Congress

In recent months, some malicious actors have been plotting to unravel the very fabric of our society, sowing discord and unsettling the social harmony we hold dear.

This dastardly act first reared its head in Dharan in eastern Nepal, only to be thwarted by the efforts of local administration and security forces. The vigilant watch of political parties and civil society also played a pivotal role in quelling the potential flames of communal tension that threatened to spread to other parts of the country. 

Next, a similar dark event emerged in Malangwa, the district headquarters of Siraha, in Madhes province. A protracted curfew was imposed to suppress the brewing unrest. But the situation remains precarious in both Dharan and Siraha.

Now, a fresh wave of unrest has surged in Nepalgunj, a mid-western city, and there are fears that this discord may spread to other corners of the country. The catalyst for this upheaval was a social media post by a young Hindu man, which ignited protests by the Muslim community. They gathered at the District Administration Office and burned tires in the streets. In response to the protest, a local Hindu group took out a rally on Tuesday, which spiraled into a violent clash between the two groups. At least 22 individuals, including five security personnel, were injured. Nepalgunj is still under a curfew.

In the digital realm, the situation mirrors the turmoil in the streets. Social media has become a breeding ground for hate speech and incendiary rhetoric, posing a grave threat to social harmony. Individuals from one community are posting contents intended to vilify another, with even responsible local leaders guilty of propagating such harmful materials. Unfortunately, Nepal lacks a legal and institutional framework to monitor, regulate, and remove such toxic content.

The Press Council Nepal, the regulatory body for the media sector, has asked social media users to refrain from posting materials that could disrupt peace and harmony in our society.

In Nepal, social media platforms like YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and TikTok serve as the battlegrounds for this digital discord. The Nepal Army was deployed in Nepalgunj to restore order, but some individuals continue to disseminate fake videos and photos, further stoking the fires of hatred. The government must take swift measures to address this issue without infringing upon the freedom of speech and expression.

For the first time in recent memory, signs of distress are surfacing in multiple locations simultaneously. If political parties, government agencies, and civil society fail to respond judiciously, the embers of communal violence may burst into a raging inferno at any moment. The government, which has pledged to uphold peace and harmony, cannot afford to remain indifferent to these developments. Yet, the government has been conspicuously absent. Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal was on a foreign trip for more than two weeks as the nation was grappling with communal tensions.

While minor cases of communal violence were once sporadic and localized, recent events suggest a more sinister motive at play. It seems that systematic efforts are underway to stoke religious tensions, potentially leading to the dismantling of the 2015 constitution, with shadowy forces lurking behind the scenes. The gravity of the situation cannot be overstated, and it is disconcerting that both the government and political parties seem to underestimate it.

Parliamentarians on Tuesday raised their voices in protest, compelling the government to finally acknowledge the systematic attempts to foment ethnic, religious, and regional tensions. At present, no prominent political party seeks to amend the constitution in any significant way, making it even more challenging to pinpoint the forces behind this campaign to ignite social and religious turmoil.

A senior security official suspects that some religious groups are behind these incidents, and that they are using some influential community and political leaders to push their agenda.

These unsettling developments are unfolding against the backdrop of a deepening economic crisis and a rising cost of living, which could further jeopardize our fragile economy. As the Dashain festival approaches, extended curfews in major cities threaten to cripple local businesses and, in turn, the local economy.

Frustration with the government and major political parties is reaching a boiling point, and opportunistic elements may exploit this discontent. 

Lawmakers, dissatisfied with the government’s response, have demanded more decisive action. Ishwari Devi Neupane, a Nepali Congress lawmaker, has warned against undermining Nepal’s “unity in diversity” and called for serious government intervention. Dhawal SJB Rana, a lawmaker from the Rastriya Prajatantra Party, has underscored the role of social media in sowing discord and urged the government to combat crimes committed through these platforms.

Chairman of CPN (Unified Socialist), Madhav Kumar Nepal, has also warned against attempts to disrupt social harmony, emphasizing Nepal’s history of peaceful coexistence among diverse religious and ethnic groups.

All security agencies, including the Nepal Army, are on high alert, closely monitoring the potential eruption of tensions in other parts of the country. Identity-based federalism and potential communal strife have emerged as significant security challenges. The Ministry of Home Affairs has also said that it is closely watching those actively fomenting trouble, with some arrests already made.

The Koshi province remains particularly vulnerable, with simmering tensions erupting in the name of the province, according to the observation of security agencies. Social harmony and peace have also been disrupted in the Madhes and Lumbini provinces. Reports suggest that fundamentalist elements are active in other parts of the country, adding to the complexity of the situation.

Home Minister Narayan Kaji Shrestha has been in dialogue with representatives of various religious organizations, seeking to uncover the forces behind these attempts to destabilize society.

While unrest in Nepalgunj and other regions is not entirely unprecedented, the current situation differs in its reach and intensity. Security experts say that a long-term solution is essential to address these issues. 

Tikaram Pokhrel, spokesperson for the National Human Rights Commission, has urged all stakeholders to preserve social harmony and unity.

Reflecting upon the intricate challenge of harmonizing theoretical principles with the practical facets agreed upon by political parties and commissions in previous political discussions, the ongoing discourse on transitional justice is deeply engaging. Almost 17 years have elapsed since the signing of the peace agreement, yet transitional justice persists as a sensitive and complex matter. There exists a unanimous consensus that for the peace agreement to be truly meaningful, the process of creating and implementing laws, along with the effective functioning of commissions, is imperative.

Transitional justice is not merely a concern for specific political entities but also a national priority. The key lies in fostering unity and responsibility among political parties, extending beyond legal technicalities. Moreover, strict adherence to the Supreme Court's interpretation and orders throughout the transitional justice process is a crucial aspect of moving forward.

It is important to recognize the prevalence of misleading narratives surrounding transitional justice and advocate for careful discussions to dispel such misconceptions. A special committee comprising experts and members having diverse political backgrounds must be formed and this committee should play a pivotal role in providing recommendations on the bill related to transitional justice. It is necessary to address ambiguities in the bill concerning the violation of human rights and crimes against humanity through simplified definitions.

Key recommendations are the significance of inclusivity when establishing a commission for truth-seeking, reconciliation and the identification of victims of transitional justice. Emphasis should be on the inclusion of individuals with national recognition and subject-specific expertise. Furthermore, tasks related to transitional justice, encompassing truth-seeking, prosecution, reparations and institutional reforms, need prioritizing.

Underscoring the importance of embracing restorative and transformative justice concepts involves active involvement of victims in the dialogue process to gain their trust and effectively address their grievances. The report puts forward a comprehensive approach that includes truth-seeking, prosecutions for crimes committed, reparations for the victims and institutional reforms to prevent future injustices.

There should be no fight against the victims of the war. Urging introspection among all stakeholders, emphasizing the need to expedite the transitional justice process and putting an end to injustice—these must be our priorities. The event, which served as a platform for prominent figures to share their perspectives and suggestions, stands as a crucial step toward forging a path forward in the transitional justice process in Nepal.

In conclusion, the recommendations presented here are grounded in the belief that careful, inclusive and comprehensive approaches are essential for effective progression of transitional justice in Nepal. By prioritizing national unity, dispelling misleading narratives and actively engaging victims in the process, all stakeholders should work collectively toward a society that values accountability, reconciliation and lasting peace. The journey ahead is challenging, but with concerted efforts from political parties, experts and the broader community, the goals of transitional justice can be achieved.

The author is executive director at Nepal Center for Security Governance