Submit your Article

Among the 753 local governments, 33—11 municipalities and 22 rural municipalities—have failed to bring their budget for the fiscal year 2023/24 on time. According to Section 71 of the Local Government Operation Act, 2017, local governments are required to present their budget by Asar 10 (June 24/25) and have them passed by the end of Asar (July 15/16). 

On a positive note, Sudurpaschim province, which has 88 local units, has achieved a 100 percent record this year as all units passed their budget on time. In the fiscal years 2022/23 and 2020/21, Gandaki province had also set a perfect record. 

Meanwhile, Madhes province continues to have a poor track record. As the second largest province in terms of local units, Madhes has 136 governments, and 24 of them failed to pass their budgets on time this year. The number of local units missing the budget deadline in Madhes was 34 in 2020/21, 32 in 2021/22, and 28 in 2022/23.

Geeta Devi Mahato, the Vice-chairperson of Chandranagar Rural Municipality in Sarlahi district, Madhes, has accused Chairperson Raj Kumar Mahato of taking unilateral decisions without consulting others, resulting in the budget presentation delay. 

Raj Kumar, on the other hand, points finger at Geeta Devi and her team for the delay, claiming they refused to attend numerous meetings convened to address the issue concerning budget allocation. “They have been boycotting the executive committee and village council meetings without providing any valid reasons,” he says.

Disagreement between municipal heads and their deputies is the main reason behind the delay in budget presentation.  

ApEx reached out to many representatives from the local units that had failed to bring their budget on time, and they all had the same excuse, where mayors or chairpersons blamed their deputies and vice versa.

Four local units in Gandaki province, two in Lumbini and one each in Koshi, Bagmati and Karnali provinces also failed to meet the budget presentation deadline.

Ram Chandra Joshi, mayor of Kushma Municipality, Parbat district of Gandaki province, says that the budget process was obstructed because several ward chairpersons wanted more budget allocations for their areas. “There is no other reason to obstruct the budget presentation process other than to exert political pressure on me.”

Joshi says he lacks a majority in the executive committee and council, but the Local Government Operation Act, 2017 has not imagined a majority or minority provisions for local executives and councils. “Despite being aware of the law, the obstruction from executive committee members prevented us from presenting the budget on time,” adds Joshi.

The Municipal Association of Nepal (MuAN) says that the general public should not suffer due to the power struggles among local representatives. “A law should be passed so that those local units that fail to bring the budget on time are prohibited from spending even a single rupee from the state coffers,” suggests an official from the association.

Currently, the only repercussion faced by municipalities for delayed budget submissions is receiving reduced subsidies from the National Natural Resources and Fiscal Commission. 

“The commission allocates subsidies to local units based on their performance, with timely budget presentation and approval carrying weightage of five points each in the total score of 100 points,” says Gyanendra Paudel, the spokesperson for the commission. “In other words, higher scores lead to increased subsidies.”

Federalism expert and lawmaker Khim Lal Devkota, suggests redirecting the reduced subsidy of local units that fail to meet the budget deadline to neighboring municipalities.

“This measure could foster healthy competition among local representatives and encourage better performance,” he says. “Locals will also pressurize their representatives to perform their responsibilities if they see their neighboring areas doing well.”

Devkota highlights that this approach has been successfully implemented before Nepal adopted federalism, when District Development Committees (DDC) was in charge of budget allocation. Under the system, the government would reduce the subsidy of poorly performing DDCs and allocate it to more efficient and hardworking ones. The strategy significantly enhanced the work of most of the development committees.

“It is the only way I see to hold the elected local representatives accountable,” says Devkota.

Approximately 33 percent or one-thirds of the total federal budget, equivalent to around Rs 600bn, is allocated to the local level for this fiscal year. Untimely budget allocation negatively impacts local employment, income, and ultimately hampers the overall economic growth of the country.

Economist Chandra Mani Adhikari is opposed to the idea of reducing subsidies for non-performing local units, and suggests introducing other forms of punishment. “Why should the public bear the brunt of the representatives’ corrupt actions?” he says. “People should file a petition at the Supreme Court, as these actions are an assault on our system and a violation of the Local Government Operation Act, 2017.” 

Adhikari also warns that consistent failure of the local government to do their job well could fuel people’s resentment toward federalism.

Officials at the federal affairs department of the Ministry of Federal Affairs and General Administration say local governments are not under the ministry’s jurisdiction, that they are an elected entity chosen by the people. They say the ministry just facilitates the local units, and it is the job of the people to hold their municipal governments accountable.

Laxmi Devi Pandey, chairperson of the National Association of Rural Municipalities in Nepal (NARMIN) and the chair of Hupsekot Rural Municipality, claims that the association has repeatedly reminded local units and their representatives to do the job for which they have been sent by the people. “There is no need to obstruct the executive committee and council meetings because the failure to present the budget will harm the local economy and community.” 

Kamal Prasad Bhattarai, joint secretary and the spokesperson for the Ministry of Federal Affairs and General Administration, is hopeful that the local governments will get their act together in the coming years.

“The number of local units failing to submit their budget on time has decreased over the years, and this improvement is a result of adopting a ‘learning by doing’ approach,” he says. 

Between 2020/21 and 2023/24, there has been a decreasing trend in the number of local units failing to submit their budget on time. The figures for non-compliance were 46, 53, 42, and 33, respectively.

Bhattarai says the ministry has been guiding and training local representatives to execute their roles effectively by adhering to a fixed set of protocol.

The Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE) plunged by 29. 71 points to close at 2,126. 48 points on Thursday.

Similarly, the sensitive index dropped by 5. 26 points to close at 403. 84 points.

A total of 6,271,777-unit shares of 271 companies were traded for Rs 3. 12 billion.

Meanwhile, NIC Asia Flexi CAP Fund was the top gainer today with their price surging by 7. 39 percent.

Likewise, Kisan Laghubitta Bittiya Sanstha Limited was the top loser with its price dropped by 8. 68 percent.

At the end of the day, the total market capitalization stood at Rs 3. 12 trillion.

With the country grappling with the economic slowdown, the insurance industry has taken a significant hit in the current fiscal year. Both life and non-life insurance businesses experienced single-digit growth in the fiscal year 2022/23.

After experiencing double-digit growth in previous years, the insurance sector (both life and non-life) saw a meager increase of 2.85 percent in 2022/23, which is significantly lower compared to the robust growth of 16.48 percent witnessed in 2021/22.

The preliminary data unveiled by the Nepal Insurance Authority shows that life and nonlife insurers collected insurance premiums totaling Rs 182.88bn in the last FY. In 2021/22, the total premium collection stood at Rs 177.81bn.

The business of life insurance companies surged by 2.64 percent in the last fiscal year while non-life insurance companies saw their business grow by 3.6 percent. 

According to NIA, life insurance companies collected premiums amounting to Rs 142.31 in the last fiscal year, while it was Rs 40.57bn for non-life insurance companies. The premium collection of life insurance companies in 2021/22 stood at Rs 138.64bn and non-life insurance companies at Rs 39.17bn.

Insurance sector experts have termed the growth rate of the non-life insurance business as not encouraging. The growth rate of the non-life insurance business was high in the last few years. “The non-life insurance business has been affected this year due to the economic recession and high prices,”  said an official of the Nepal Insurance Authority.

Among the non-life insurance companies, Shikhar Insurance tops the chart when it comes to premium collection in this fiscal. The company collected Rs 5.52bn in insurance premiums till mid-July 2023. 

Sagarmatha Lumbini Insurance is in the second position with a premium collection worth Rs 4.55bn and Siddhartha Premier Insurance is in the third position with a premium collection of Rs 4.51bn. 

The insurance sector faced significant pressure last year due to various factors, including the economic slowdown, and reduced credit flow from banks and financial institutions. As a result of the sharp decline in public savings capacity, the conducive environment for long-term investment in life insurance could not be sustained throughout the year.

However, the opening of imports of luxury goods, including vehicles, enabled the expansion of business for non-life insurance companies in the second half of the last fiscal year.

Insurers say that the rise in the non-renewal and surrendering of insurance policies has dragged the business down in the last fiscal year.

With Nepal Rastra Bank adopting tighter monetary policy along with a slowdown in loan demand, the commercial banks’ lending grew by a marginal 3.42 percent in the last fiscal year. 

The commercial banks that experienced a liquidity crunch in the first half of the FY 2022/23 saw problems of non-disbursement of loans in the second half of the last fiscal. Bankers said demands for loans have remained low throughout the last fiscal. 

While the NRB had targeted private sector credit growth to 12.6 percent in 2022/23, the actual credit growth remained much lesser than the target. In fact, the credit expansion to the private sector in 2022/23 was far less than what the banks lent in 2021/22. The banks’ lending grew by 3.42 percent in 2022/23 compared to 12.2 percent in 2021/22.

According to bankers, the private sector has not sought bank loans with the deepening economic downturn. On the other hand, retail loans such as housing loans and auto loans did not grow due to higher interest rates. While the BFIs gradually lowered the loan interest rates, the demand for loans did not surge as expected.

According to the data of the Nepal Bankers Association (NBA), commercial banks disbursed loans amounting to Rs 144bn in 2022/23 whereas such loan disbursement in 2021/22 stood at Rs 454bn. The total lending of banks by the end of the last fiscal year stood at Rs 4,318bn. 

“The demands for loans have remained subdued due to the state of the economy and businesses,” said Sudesh Khaling, CEO of Everest Bank, “In the initial months of the last fiscal, credit flow could not increase due to a lack of liquidity in the banking system. Later, when the liquidity situation improved, there was no demand for loans.”

Bankers say the other reason behind the sluggish lending is banks have become more cautious in loan disbursement due to a sharp rise in non-performing loans (NPLs).

According to the private sector, the high-interest rates also contributed to lower demand for loans. The private sector has been demanding that interest rates need to be lowered arguing that the average interest rate of loans remained higher that previous years. 

Deposits of commercial banks increased by 12 percent in 2022/23. The banks’ deposits stood at Rs 5,086bn in mid-July 2023 from Rs 4,541bn in mid-July 2022. The banks’ deposits increased by Rs 545bn in the last fiscal.   

After going through a liquidity crunch in the first half, the banking system was flushed with excess liquidity by the end of the last fiscal. With demands for loans drying up, investable capital piled up in the banking system in the last few months of 2022/23. 

With lesser demand for loans, the CD ratio of commercial banks came down to 82.10 percent in mid-July 2023, which was 88.07 percent in mid-July 2022. As per central bank regulatory norms, banks can disburse 90 percent of their deposits in loans. Banks have to maintain the credit-to-deposit ratio (CD ratio) at 90 percent.