Federalism and growth
The Asian Development Bank’s latest Nepal Macroeconomic Update is reflective of the fears surrounding the implementation of federalism and operationalization of the three tiers of government. It projects the national economy to grow by 5.5 percent in 2018/19, well below the government target of 8 percent, but still respectable considering an average of 4.3 percent growth over the past one decade.
Boosting growth this year will be expectation of political stability, as well as normal monsoon and implementation of mega-infrastructure projects, says the report. But it then points out limited capacity of sub-national government units and complications in implementation of federalism as the biggest obstacles to growth. “Slow progress in requisite legislation and deployment of staff, the need for further clarification of mandates and responsibilities of the three tiers of government, and inconsistencies in revenue mobilization regarding fees and taxes at local levels” could all hinder smooth operationalization of fiscal federalism.
Clearly, for Nepal to prosper there should be a high level of coordination between the three tiers of government, and a level of agreement on resource mobilization and spending. Yet what we see is the opposite. Local units complain that even though they have been saddled with many responsibilities, the center has been miserly about giving them the needed money and manpower. Likewise, the seven provincial governments are unhappy that between them ‘the center and the local units have appropriated all vital powers’ and the province-level governments as such have been made redundant. The federal government for its part says these are birth pangs of federalism and things will be sorted out in due course.
In other words, there is currently little trust between the different tiers, which in turn is crimping their growth prospects. If the ruling coalition under Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli is serious about honoring its promise of all-round prosperity, it will have to start trusting the lower tiers more, and not hesitate to delegate vital powers and resources. In a federal system, the center acts not so much as guardians of lower tiers but more as facilitators of their aspirations for development. Yes, there is room for abuse of such delegated powers. But then the old unitary dispensation was hardly a model of economic rectitude. The onus is on the all-powerful federal government to honor the letter and spirit of federalism.
related news
Editorial: Curb digital anarchy
Dec. 20, 2024, 9:20 a.m.
Editorial: Let there be laws
Dec. 13, 2024, 9:50 a.m.
Editorial: A cold heart
Dec. 8, 2024, 9:50 a.m.
Editorial: Strong as mountains, dynamic as rivers
Nov. 28, 2024, 10:39 p.m.
Editorial: A painful wait for tickets
Nov. 22, 2024, 8:48 a.m.
Editorial: Provide for the survivors
Nov. 15, 2024, 8:56 a.m.
Editorial: Exclusion undermine Nepal’s COP29 participation
Nov. 8, 2024, 11:43 a.m.
Editorial: PM Oli’s 100 days in office
Oct. 25, 2024, 6:22 a.m.
Comments