The violent arson attack on the headquarters of Annapurna Media Network (AMN) is a direct assault on press freedom and democracy. Had the police and security forces not acted swiftly, the situation could have escalated into a devastating tragedy.
Supporters of the pro-monarchy movement stormed our offices, reportedly acting on direct instructions from certain leaders. Their rampage led to extensive vandalism and arson, causing significant damage to our building and infrastructure. Both domestic and international stakeholders must take note—this was not a mere protest but a deliberate attack on independent journalism. Even during the Maoist insurgency and King Gyanendra Shah’s suppression of democracy in 2005, we did not face such a blatant act of violence.
Nepal’s Constitution guarantees press freedom, ranking among the highest in South Asia. However, in practice, independent media houses like ours are facing increasing threats, intimidation, and harassment. These pressures have led to a growing environment of self-censorship. Despite any imperfections, for over three decades, Nepali independent media has exposed corruption, highlighted irregularities, and held those in power accountable. We have consistently defended sovereignty, democracy, and the rule of law—positions that make us a target for corrupt, autocratic, and extremist groups.
We acknowledge concerns regarding media accuracy, balance, and credibility and remain committed to upholding journalistic integrity. However, maintaining ethical journalism does not mean staying silent in the face of such attacks. The events of March 29 were not just an attack on AMN but on the very foundation of democracy. If anyone attempts to silence us through violence, we will respond with our strongest weapon—our words, not force. We stand for peaceful political discourse and pluralism but caution the government against suppressing civil and political rights. There is a clear distinction between political activism and terror activities, and what transpired in Tinkune was an act of creating terror, not politics.
While it may be difficult to establish a direct link between this attack and former king Gyanendra, politically, the connection is evident. On Democracy Day (Falgun 7), he urged the public to support him, triggering a wave of protests. A day before the attack, on March 28, he met with key figures of the movement. Given his history—when he seized power on February 1, 2005, and brutally suppressed press freedom—we have every reason to question his commitment to democracy, freedom of speech, and civil liberties. He must clarify his position regarding these incidents.
This is not the first attack we have endured. Over the past three decades, we have faced threats during the Maoist insurgency, the Madhes movement, and Gyanendra’s direct rule. Even in recent months, political parties like the Rastriya Swatantra Party have attempted to intimidate us for exposing financial misconduct.
In a democracy, every citizen has the right to engage in politics, seek governance, and shape public opinion, but these rights must be exercised peacefully and within the law. No individual or group is above the democratic system, and violence has no place in political discourse. Annapurna Media Network has always stood at the forefront of defending democracy and ensuring political accountability. No amount of intimidation will deter us from our mission. We firmly believe that democracy and republicanism are the ultimate safeguards of press freedom, human rights, and civil liberties—and we will continue to uphold these values, no matter the cost.
The silence of the international community on this blatant attack on press freedom is deeply concerning. At a time when democratic values are under threat, their failure to condemn such violence only emboldens those who seek to suppress the press.
Kamal Dev Bhattarai
Editor
