The tragic case of Nepali student Prakriti Lamsal, who was compelled to take her own life following continuous harassment by an alleged male acquaintance at KIIT University, has sparked significant discourse. The incident, which took place on February 16, was particularly distressing as Lamsal had lodged a formal complaint with the university administration four months prior, seeking protection. However, the failure to address her grievances in a timely manner led to this unfortunate outcome.
Equally concerning was the response of certain university officials, particularly two women in administrative roles, whose handling of the situation was widely criticized. Their conduct was not only perceived as insensitive but also included remarks that were offensive to the dignity of Nepal and its people. The ensuing protests by Nepali students, later joined by Indian students, underscored the gravity of the issue and the necessity of institutional accountability.
A coordinated response
While the situation was deeply distressing, the manner in which it was managed through diplomatic engagement prevented further escalation. Immediate actions were taken at multiple levels, demonstrating a commitment to justice and the protection of students.
Following the incident, both the Nepali Embassy in New Delhi and the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu actively engaged in addressing the repercussions. Nepali Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and Foreign Minister Arzu Rana took to social media, urging swift action against the perpetrator and ensuring the safety of Nepali students protesting for justice. Prime Minister Oli also directed two embassy officials to travel to Odisha to assess the situation firsthand and engage with the university administration.
Recognizing the sensitivity of the matter, the Indian government responded by addressing the government’s immediate concerns. The KIIT administration, under mounting pressure, took corrective measures, including the suspension of senior hostel officials and an associate professor who were caught on record making inappropriate remarks against Nepali students. Two security personnel responsible for excessive force against protesting students were also dismissed. Additionally, the university's international relations officer was suspended.
Efforts to contain the fallout
Despite these corrective actions, many Nepali students had already begun leaving Bhubaneswar, citing security concerns. In an attempt to restore confidence, the university's vice-chancellor issued multiple statements, expressing regret and assuring the provision of adequate security for Nepali students. However, the delay in addressing the original complaint and the subsequent mishandling of student grievances had already tarnished the institution's reputation.
The university further attempted to mend relations by formally apologizing and committing to preventive measures, including stricter oversight of student complaints and enhanced security protocols. These steps, though necessary, were widely regarded as reactive rather than proactive, raising broader concerns about the institutional handling of harassment cases.
Broader solidarity
The incident resonated beyond university walls, sparking widespread condemnation across India. Student organizations, including those affiliated with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Indian National Congress, stood in solidarity with the Nepali students. Their support not only amplified calls for justice but also highlighted the shared concerns of students across national borders.
The issue also gained extensive media coverage, with Indian outlets highlighting the need for greater sensitivity in handling international student affairs. Editorials and news reports questioned the university’s response, placing pressure on educational institutions to prioritize student welfare over administrative convenience.
Importantly, this case did not devolve into a bilateral political controversy. Instead, it was addressed through institutional dialogue and diplomatic channels. India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) publicly acknowledged the seriousness of the issue, reinforcing its commitment to a thorough investigation. The Odisha state government, despite initial criticism, took control of the situation by forming an independent panel to conduct an impartial inquiry.
Long-term measures
The tragedy of Prakriti Lamsal has sparked critical conversations about institutional accountability and the safety of international students in India. Following this incident, KIIT University announced a series of reforms aimed at preventing such occurrences in the future. These measures include the establishment of a dedicated student grievance redressal mechanism, a stronger anti-harassment policy and a commitment to mandatory sensitivity training for faculty and staff.
Additionally, the university pledged to strengthen its support system for international students by providing counseling services, legal assistance and emergency response teams. These initiatives, if properly implemented, could serve as a model for other institutions hosting a diverse student body.
Beyond KIIT, this incident has prompted discussions at the national level in India regarding the need for clearer policies on student safety, especially for foreign students. Universities across the country have been urged to reassess their policies on handling complaints related to harassment and abuse.
The path forward
This case serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of timely intervention, institutional accountability and the role of diplomacy in crisis management. The establishment of a scholarship in Prakriti Lamsal’s name by the university’s founder-principal is a step toward recognizing the need for systemic improvements in student protection mechanisms.
The collaborative approach demonstrated by both Nepal and India in handling this sensitive issue set a constructive precedent. Rather than fueling discord, the incident demonstrated how mutual cooperation and a commitment to justice can lead to meaningful resolutions.
Going forward, both governments and academic institutions must take proactive steps to ensure the safety and dignity of international students. Strengthening grievance redressal mechanisms, fostering inclusive environments and instituting clear accountability measures are necessary to prevent such tragedies.
Importantly, diplomatic cooperation between Nepal and India in this case highlights the strength of people-to-people relations, which remain at the heart of bilateral ties. The mature handling of the crisis facilitated by diplomatic efforts, media scrutiny and civil society engagement set a positive example for future cross-border student issues.
Ultimately, this incident highlighted the power of collective action. From students to government officials, media outlets to diplomatic representatives, multiple stakeholders played a role in ensuring that justice was pursued and lessons were learned. The tragedy of Prakriti Lamsal should serve as a catalyst for lasting reforms, ensuring that no student, regardless of nationality, is ever left unheard in their pursuit of safety and justice.
