National politics, Trump policies, and more

Jan 30, Bhaktapur

It is 7:30 in the morning. The sky is partly cloudy, but Kathmandu’s temperature is gradually rising as January nears its end. A man sits in the teashop, reading the Gorkhapatra national daily. He is eager to share a piece of news about a startup conference organized by the Nepali Congress at its headquarters in Sanepa. He sees it as a positive initiative by Nepal’s largest political party but criticizes the government’s failure to create a favorable environment for startups to flourish. While some startups are thriving, he says, others have stagnated due to a lack of market access and skilled workforce. The man, who does not identify himself, appears well-informed about the challenges startups face, including legal hurdles. However, the other patrons in the teashop show little interest in discussing the topic.

Soon, another man enters and abruptly shifts the conversation to politics. He brings up news that former President Bidya Devi Bhandari is preparing to re-enter active politics. A politically conscious man in the teashop immediately responds, mentioning that Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli has sent a clear message discouraging her return. This remark sparks interest among the tea drinkers. One of them asks, “How do you know Oli sent her a message?” The man cites a recent statement by CPN-UML General Secretary Pradeep Kumar Gyawali, who publicly remarked that it would be inappropriate for Bhandari to rejoin active politics. He speculates that Oli may have instructed Gyawali to make the statement. Of the seven people in the teashop, five agree that former presidents and vice presidents should not re-enter politics.

Another person adds that former Vice-president Nanda Kishor Pun is also preparing to return and has attended party meetings, but Maoist Center Chair Pushpa Kamal Dahal is hesitant to offer him a position. The discussion then shifts to the internal dynamics of the UML. One man claims that there is dissatisfaction within the party but that no one dares to speak up, leading some to push for Bhandari’s return. He notes that Gokul Banskota was the first UML leader to invite Bhandari to a party program in Kavre last year, but a rift has since developed between him and Oli. Others in the teashop mention Bhandari’s recent visits to Biratnagar and Pokhara, where she engaged extensively with party leaders and cadres.

The conversation naturally drifts toward international affairs, particularly American politics. Some express strong opinions about former US President Donald Trump’s decision to pause US aid through USAID. One person argues that halting aid is beneficial, as it will reduce Nepal’s dependency and force the government to take more responsibility. He adds that those employed in USAID projects may be unsettled by the decision. Another person interjects, criticizing the misuse of USAID funds, pointing to extravagant expenditures on five-star hotels and other unnecessary areas. The discussion then becomes disorganized, with various people sharing their views on illegal immigration. Someone remarks, “People have spent over Rs 10m to get to the US through traffickers. If they are deported, it will be a devastating blow to their families.” Another voice chimes in, stating, “Countries will never prosper through foreign grants.” Notably, there is little discussion about Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) Chairman Rabi Lamichhane—a stark contrast to the frequent debates about him in past weeks.

As the morning progresses, the teashop empties. I wait, hoping for new perspectives. Eventually, a man in his sixties enters, orders milk tea, and begins discussing the durability of the current government. He recalls predictions that the Oli government wouldn’t last long but points out the cordial relationship between Oli and Nepali Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba. He claims that the two leaders recently met and agreed to keep the coalition intact. “I think Prachanda’s efforts to topple this government will fail,” he states confidently. I ask, “So you believe this coalition will last?” He responds, “Khai, malai chai testai lagcha” (“Well, that’s what I think”). He then speculates that efforts are underway to unite all communist forces under Bhandari’s leadership and suggests that even Maoist Chairman Dahal has agreed to the plan. However, he suddenly grows uneasy, shifts the topic, and confesses, “Forget politics—I am suffering from multiple health issues. Who cares about us? I have a lot of money, but I’m not happy. Both my sons are abroad. They want me to join them in Australia, but I don’t want to leave. Who will take care of us here?”

Then, unexpectedly, he asks about my profession. This is the first time someone has questioned me directly since I started my teashop column. I answer honestly: “I am a journalist.” This marks the beginning of my uneasy moment. He launches into a tirade about journalism, accusing reporters of being irresponsible and spreading misinformation. “Tell me, why are all journalists against Rabi Lamichhane?” he demands. I try to explain the difference between journalistic and non-journalistic content, cautioning against misinformation and disinformation, but he remains unconvinced. Seeing that my argument is going nowhere, I steer the conversation toward Trump. This successfully diverts his focus, and he asserts, “Nepali people should understand that every politician prioritizes their own country’s interests, and that’s exactly what Trump is doing.”

He offers me a cup of tea, but I decline, having already had two. When I ask about his profession, he reveals that he once worked for a private company and now owns two houses—one in Kathmandu and another in Bhaktapur. Before I leave, he circles back to his criticism of the media, making unverified accusations against certain outlets. I choose to remain silent.

As I left the teashop, a question lingered in my mind: Why do people distrust mainstream media, yet readily consume unverified content elsewhere? Is it a lack of awareness, or are there genuine flaws in journalism today? I had no ready answer.