Rabi Lamichhane, migration, disinformation and more

Dec 19, Balkot, Bhaktapur

“This country will never improve, believe me,” a man declared as I entered the teashop. His voice, laden with frustration, carried across the room. “People are suffering endlessly—corruption is rampant, and those aligned with the major political parties are getting richer, while people like us continue to struggle.”

The conversation quickly shifted to Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) Chairperson Rabi Lamichhane, turning the teashop into a lively arena of debate. “Look,” one man said in Lamichhane’s defense, “the media allegations about his unusual bank transactions have already been proven baseless. His wife clarified they’re just repaying a home loan in installments.”

Not everyone was convinced. Another participant retorted, “The details of the ongoing police investigation are still unclear. Let’s not jump to conclusions.”

Since starting this column, I’ve noticed Kathmandu Mayor Balendra Shah rarely faces criticism, while opinions on Lamichhane remain sharply divided. In this teashop, too, some argued that Nepali Congress and CPN-UML supporters were targeting Lamichhane out of political vendetta, while others accused him of involvement in cooperative fraud.

The discussion veered towards the apparent disinterest of Nepali youth in politics. “Young people in their 20s today have no understanding of the political movements of 2006-2007, or even the contributions of Nepali Congress and CPN-UML,” commented a participant who seemed educated and politically aware.

According to him, the younger generation’s detachment stems from the lack of coverage of Nepal’s significant democratic milestones—like the movements of 1950, 1980, 1990, and 2006—in the school curriculum. “They don’t value democracy because they’ve never experienced autocracy,” he stated, as others listened in reflective silence.

He reminisced about his college days when campuses were vibrant political hubs. “Now, private colleges are politically apathetic. Government colleges still show some awareness, but it’s fading fast,” he said with concern.

Another voice in the room offered a starkly different perspective. “The root of Nepal’s problems lies in the end of the Panchayat regime in 1990 and the premature establishment of democracy,” he asserted. Democracy, he claimed, deeply politicized Nepali society and fractured its unity. “Before 1990, we were united. Our forefathers helped one another, and there was a sense of community. Now, politics has divided us.”

While some nodded in agreement, others appeared skeptical, challenging his romanticized portrayal of the past.

As expected, the conversation shifted again, this time to the escalating trend of youth migration for education and employment abroad. Most blamed political instability and job scarcity, but one person took a different stance. “It’s not just unemployment,” he said. “Today’s youth migrate for luxury. They see the affluence of wealthy countries and dream of that lifestyle, even if they can earn well here.”

He argued that migration is a global phenomenon, not limited to Nepal. “Even in countries like China and India, youth are leaving. Job creation and political stability might not solve this entirely,” he said, expressing concern over Nepal’s ageing population. “Soon, countries like Japan, South Korea, and Germany, which face their own ageing crises, will offer attractive packages to lure our workers.”

Another participant turned the focus to internal migration and its consequences. “As people flock to Kathmandu for education and jobs, fertile land in villages is being abandoned,” he lamented. “If another crisis like Covid-19 forces us back to the villages, we’ll face severe problems with no food to sustain us.”

The discussion also touched on the rampant spread of misinformation. One man claimed Prime Minister Oli had been attacked during a visit to Banepa, only to be contradicted by another participant who called the video fake. “How can it be fake when there’s a video?” another argued, illustrating the confusion sowed by unverified information.

The topic then shifted to a recent video of UML leader Surya Thapa, head of the parliamentary probe panel investigating cooperative fraud. In the video, widely shared on social media, Thapa defended Rabi Lamichhane, stating no evidence linked him to the cooperative scandal. The debate over the authenticity of such claims reflected the broader challenge of discerning truth in a digitally driven society.