If one already knows how to differentiate right and wrong, why exactly does one need a tint of religion in their glasses to perceive the world? Through this write up, I try to address this compounded question that many philosophers have failed to address. Keyword being try. Religion has become an alibi for those in power to commit absolute inhumane acts. It is not to be ignored that religion has its beautiful side to it as well. But why attach those euphoric sentiments to a mere social construction. These jolly moments attached with religion have created yet another tint in people’s eyes to ignore the negative aspect it brings along as well.  What I can acknowledge is that all religions have their differences, beautiful differences even but they find common grounds when it comes to endorsing oppression. 

For instance the Bible in no way endorses pro-life ideologies instead biblical texts celebrate the choices women make for their bodies. Forgive the biases but the Quran in no way endorses oppressing women and limiting them to domestic works, instead it widely emphasizes free will.

Homosexuality was not even a term when the bible existed. Yet people now define their hatred towards homosexuals as a religious sentiment. This same sentiment is what keeps fueling other inhumane acts. Same applies for Hinduism, the absolute patriarchal beliefs are solidified by religious sentiments with no regard for an individual. Hinduism and the religious items it is signified by has shown patriarchal beliefs. But it has shown how women should be liberated to equal status with men as well. The latter part is completely ignored. The fact that religion is not monolithic means it can be influenced by other apparatuses. Particularly from those looking to promote an ideology. Perhaps, if religious interpretations were legally bound too, the bending of these rules to justify animosity would decrease. From this write up, I see religion playing a crucial role. Crucial role of an alibi. Sakshat Pant  AS Level Chelsea International Academy